Sara Op de Beeck1,2,3, Andrew Wellman4, Marijke Dieltjens1,2, Kingman P Strohl5, Marc Willemen3, Paul H Van de Heyning1,2, Johan A Verbraecken6,3,7, Olivier M Vanderveken1,2,3, Scott A Sands4. 1. Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, and. 2. Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Head and Neck Surgery. 3. Multidisciplinary Sleep Disorders Centre, and. 4. Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and. 5. Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 6. Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 7. Department of Pulmonology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Abstract
Rationale: Approximately one-third of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy are incomplete responders, despite careful patient selection based on baseline characteristics and drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Objectives: Here we use polysomnographic endotyping to assess the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying favorable versus incomplete responses to HGNS therapy. Methods: Baseline polysomnography data of the STAR (Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction) trial were included. Raw baseline polysomnographic data from 91/126 patients were available for analysis. Traits-loop gain, arousal threshold, collapsibility, and muscle compensation-were calculated from the baseline polysomnography data according to Sands and colleagues (AJRCCM 2018, SLEEP 2018). Logistic regression assessed apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-adjusted associations between HGNS response (>50% reduction in AHI to <10/h at 1 yr) and OSA traits.Measurements and Main Results: Overall, HGNS treatment reduced AHI from 30.7 (24.9-39.9) to 8.5 (4.0-19.5) events/h (P < 0.0001; median [quartiles 1-3]); N = 53/91 were responders. In adjusted analysis, a favorable response to therapy was independently associated with higher arousal threshold (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 6.76 [2.44-23.3], P = 0.001), greater compensation (odds ratio: 4.22 [1.70-12.55] per SD, P = 0.004), and lower loop gain (in milder collapsibility, per significant interaction, P = 0.003). The higher arousal threshold was evident in responders before adjusted analysis. Predicted responders had an approximately fourfold lower treatment AHI versus predicted nonresponders (4.9 [2.7-8.5] vs. 20.7 [10.9-29.7], P < 0.0001; median [quartiles 1-3]); differences remained significant after cross-validation.Conclusions: Favorable responses to HGNS therapy are associated with the pathophysiological traits causing OSA, particularly a higher arousal threshold. Along with established criteria, individuals with favorable traits could potentially be prioritized for precision HGNS therapy.This analysis was a secondary analysis of the STAR trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01161420).
Rationale: Approximately one-third of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy are incomplete responders, despite careful patient selection based on baseline characteristics and drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Objectives: Here we use polysomnographic endotyping to assess the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying favorable versus incomplete responses to HGNS therapy. Methods: Baseline polysomnography data of the STAR (Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction) trial were included. Raw baseline polysomnographic data from 91/126 patients were available for analysis. Traits-loop gain, arousal threshold, collapsibility, and muscle compensation-were calculated from the baseline polysomnography data according to Sands and colleagues (AJRCCM 2018, SLEEP 2018). Logistic regression assessed apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-adjusted associations between HGNS response (>50% reduction in AHI to <10/h at 1 yr) and OSA traits.Measurements and Main Results: Overall, HGNS treatment reduced AHI from 30.7 (24.9-39.9) to 8.5 (4.0-19.5) events/h (P < 0.0001; median [quartiles 1-3]); N = 53/91 were responders. In adjusted analysis, a favorable response to therapy was independently associated with higher arousal threshold (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 6.76 [2.44-23.3], P = 0.001), greater compensation (odds ratio: 4.22 [1.70-12.55] per SD, P = 0.004), and lower loop gain (in milder collapsibility, per significant interaction, P = 0.003). The higher arousal threshold was evident in responders before adjusted analysis. Predicted responders had an approximately fourfold lower treatment AHI versus predicted nonresponders (4.9 [2.7-8.5] vs. 20.7 [10.9-29.7], P < 0.0001; median [quartiles 1-3]); differences remained significant after cross-validation.Conclusions: Favorable responses to HGNS therapy are associated with the pathophysiological traits causing OSA, particularly a higher arousal threshold. Along with established criteria, individuals with favorable traits could potentially be prioritized for precision HGNS therapy.This analysis was a secondary analysis of the STAR trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01161420).
Authors: Simon A Joosten; Paul Leong; Shane A Landry; Scott A Sands; Philip I Terrill; Dwayne Mann; Anthony Turton; Jhanavi Rangaswamy; Christopher Andara; Glen Burgess; Darren Mansfield; Garun S Hamilton; Bradley A Edwards Journal: Sleep Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Scott A Sands; Philip I Terrill; Bradley A Edwards; Luigi Taranto Montemurro; Ali Azarbarzin; Melania Marques; Camila M de Melo; Stephen H Loring; James P Butler; David P White; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Danny J Eckert; Robert L Owens; Geoffrey B Kehlmann; Andrew Wellman; Shilpa Rahangdale; Susie Yim-Yeh; David P White; Atul Malhotra Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Simon A Joosten; Bradley A Edwards; Andrew Wellman; Anthony Turton; Elizabeth M Skuza; Philip J Berger; Garun S Hamilton Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Patrick J Strollo; M Boyd Gillespie; Ryan J Soose; Joachim T Maurer; Nico de Vries; Jason Cornelius; Ronald D Hanson; Tapan A Padhya; David L Steward; B Tucker Woodson; Johan Verbraecken; Olivier M Vanderveken; Mark G Goetting; Neil Feldman; Frédéric Chabolle; M Safwan Badr; Winfried Randerath; Kingman P Strohl Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Daniel Vena; Ali Azarbarzin; Melania Marques; Sara Op de Beeck; Olivier M Vanderveken; Bradley A Edwards; Nicole Calianese; Lauren B Hess; Reza Radmand; Garun S Hamilton; Simon A Joosten; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Sang-Wook Kim; Johan Verbraecken; Marc Braem; David P White; Scott A Sands; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Danny J Eckert; David P White; Amy S Jordan; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jason L Yu; Yifan Liu; Akshay Tangutur; Monique Arnold; Everett G Seay; Alan R Schwartz; Raj C Dedhia Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Raichel M Alex; Tamar Sofer; Ali Azarbarzin; Daniel Vena; Laura K Gell; Andrew Wellman; David P White; Susan Redline; Scott A Sands Journal: Sleep Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 6.313
Authors: Christopher N Schmickl; Jeremy E Orr; Paul Kim; Brandon Nokes; Scott Sands; Sreeganesh Manoharan; Lana McGinnis; Gabriela Parra; Pamela DeYoung; Robert L Owens; Atul Malhotra Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Jeremy E Orr; Bradley A Edwards; Christopher N Schmickl; Maile Karris; Pamela N DeYoung; Chantal Darquenne; Rebecca Theilmann; Sonia Jain; Atul Malhotra; Charles B Hicks; Robert L Owens Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2021-10-21
Authors: Ning Zhou; Jean-Pierre T F Ho; Wouter P Visscher; Naichuan Su; Frank Lobbezoo; Jan de Lange Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2022-10-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Andrey V Zinchuk; Jen-Hwa Chu; Jiasheng Liang; Yeliz Celik; Sara Op de Beeck; Nancy S Redeker; Andrew Wellman; H Klar Yaggi; Yüksel Peker; Scott A Sands Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Elahe Kazemeini; Eli Van de Perck; Marijke Dieltjens; Marc Willemen; Johan Verbraecken; Sara Op de Beeck; Olivier M Vanderveken Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 4.003