Literature DB >> 19840960

Optimal positive airway pressure predicts oral appliance response to sleep apnoea.

S Tsuiki1, M Kobayashi, K Namba, Y Oka, Y Komada, T Kagimura, Y Inoue.   

Abstract

Patients with less severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are usually prescribed oral appliances and/or smaller optimal nasal continuous positive airway pressure (P(nCPAP)) in nCPAP therapy. We hypothesised that OSA patients with greater P(nCPAP) would not respond favourably to oral appliances. Oral appliances were inserted in nCPAP users after washing-out the nCPAP effect. Follow-up polysomnography was undertaken with the adjusted oral appliance in place. The predictability of P(nCPAP) was evaluated with receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The median baseline apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) was reduced with the oral appliance from 36 to 12 events.h(-1) in 35 patients. When responders were defined as patients showing a follow-up AHI of <5 events.h(-1) with >50% reduction in baseline AHI, the area under the ROC curve for P(nCPAP) was 0.76. The best cut-off value of P(nCPAP) turned out to be 10.5 cmH(2)O with a high negative predictive value (0.93) and a low negative likelihood ratio (0.18). OSA patients with a P(nCPAP) of >10.5 cmH( 2)O are unlikely to respond to oral appliance therapy. This prediction is clinically helpful to both OSA patients and medical personnel in discussing oral appliances as a temporary substitute and/or alternative for nCPAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19840960     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00121608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  22 in total

1.  Tongue position controller as an alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Satoru Tsuiki; Shiroh Isono; Osamu Minamino; Keiko Maeda; Mina Kobayashi; Taeko Sasai; Yasuro Takahashi; Yuichi Inoue
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Response to a combination of oxygen and a hypnotic as treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea is predicted by a patient's therapeutic CPAP requirement.

Authors:  Shane A Landry; Simon A Joosten; Scott A Sands; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman; Garun S Hamilton; Bradley A Edwards
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 6.424

3.  CPAP pressure for prediction of oral appliance treatment response in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Craig L Phillips; Amanda Davies; Vasanth K Srinivasan; Oyku Dalci; Brendon J Yee; M Ali Darendeliler; Ronald R Grunstein; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Therapeutic Positive Airway Pressure Level Predicts Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Clara H Lee; Everett G Seay; Benjamin K Walters; Nicholas J Scalzitti; Raj C Dedhia
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  A New Metric for Precision Medicine: PAP and Hypoglossal Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Ofer Jacobowitz; B Tucker Woodson
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Effects of mandibular advancement device treatment on arterial stiffness and glucose metabolism in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective 1 year study.

Authors:  Tea Galic; Josko Bozic; Natalija Ivkovic; Grgo Gunjaca; Tina Kurir Ticinovic; Zoran Dogas
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  A combination appliance for obstructive sleep apnea: the effectiveness of mandibular advancement and tongue retention.

Authors:  Leslie Dort; John Remmers
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Predicting treatment response to mandibular advancement therapy using a titratable thermoplastic device.

Authors:  Wojciech Trzepizur; Benjamin Adrian; Marc Le Vaillant; Nicole Meslier; Jean-Daniel Kün-Darbois; Frédéric Gagnadoux
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Improvement of Cognitive and Psychomotor Performance in Patients with Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treated with Mandibular Advancement Device: A Prospective 1-Year Study.

Authors:  Tea Galic; Josko Bozic; Renata Pecotic; Natalija Ivkovic; Maja Valic; Zoran Dogas
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Mandibular Advancement Device as a Comparable Treatment to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Takaesu; Satoru Tsuiki; Mina Kobayashi; Yoko Komada; Hideaki Nakayama; Yuichi Inoue
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.