Literature DB >> 32040194

In Vitro Bioavailability of the Hydrocarbon Fractions of Dimethyl Sulfoxide Extracts of Petroleum Substances.

Yu-Syuan Luo1, Kyle C Ferguson1, Ivan Rusyn1, Weihsueh A Chiu1.   

Abstract

Determining the in vitro bioavailable concentration is a critical, yet unmet need to refine in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation for unknown or variable composition, complex reaction product or biological material (UVCB) substances. UVCBs such as petroleum substances are commonly subjected to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) extraction in order to retrieve the bioactive polycyclic aromatic compound (PAC) portion for in vitro testing. In addition to DMSO extraction, protein binding in cell culture media and dilution can all influence in vitro bioavailable concentrations of aliphatic and aromatic compounds in petroleum substances. However, these in vitro factors have not been fully characterized. In this study, we aimed to fill in these data gaps by characterizing the effects of these processes using both a defined mixture of analytical standards containing aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, as well as 4 refined petroleum products as prototypical examples of UVCBs. Each substance was extracted with DMSO, and the protein binding in cell culture media was measured by using solid-phase microextraction. Semiquantitative analysis for aliphatic and aromatic compounds was achieved via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Our results showed that DMSO selectively extracted PACs from test substances, and that chemical profiles of PACs across molecular classes remained consistent after extraction. With respect to protein binding, chemical profiles were retained at a lower dilution (higher concentration), but a greater dilution factor (ie, lower concentration) resulted in higher protein binding in cell medium, which in turn altered the ultimate chemical profile of bioavailable PACs. Overall, this case study demonstrates that extraction procedures, protein binding in cell culture media, and dilution factors prior to in vitro testing can all contribute to determining the final bioavailable concentrations of bioactive constituents of UVCBs in vitro. Thus, in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation for UVCBs may require greater attention to the concentration-dependent and compound-specific differences in recovery and bioavailability.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biotransformation; pharmacokinetics; toxicokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32040194      PMCID: PMC7098373          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  39 in total

1.  A GHS-consistent approach to health hazard classification of petroleum substances, a class of UVCB substances.

Authors:  Charles R Clark; Richard H McKee; James J Freeman; Derek Swick; Suneeta Mahagaokar; Glenda Pigram; Linda G Roberts; Chantal J Smulders; Patrick W Beatty
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  The selective determination of potentially carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic compounds in lubricant base oils by the DMSO extraction method IP346 and its correlation to mouse skin painting carcinogenicity assays.

Authors:  Juan-Carlos Carrillo; Arnold van der Wiel; Dirk Danneels; Olaf Kral; Peter J Boogaard
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  The importance of protein binding for the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE)-example of ibuprofen, a highly protein-bound substance.

Authors:  H Mielke; E Di Consiglio; R Kreutz; F Partosch; E Testai; U Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making.

Authors:  Shannon M Bell; Xiaoqing Chang; John F Wambaugh; David G Allen; Mike Bartels; Kim L R Brouwer; Warren M Casey; Neepa Choksi; Stephen S Ferguson; Grazyna Fraczkiewicz; Annie M Jarabek; Alice Ke; Annie Lumen; Scott G Lynn; Alicia Paini; Paul S Price; Caroline Ring; Ted W Simon; Nisha S Sipes; Catherine S Sprankle; Judy Strickland; John Troutman; Barbara A Wetmore; Nicole C Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Environmental hazard and risk characterisation of petroleum substances: a guided "walking tour" of petroleum hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Johan Bierkens; Lieve Geerts
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Concentration-independent plasma protein binding of benzodiazepines.

Authors:  L J Moschitto; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.765

7.  Comparative analysis of Rapid Equilibrium Dialysis (RED) and solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) methods for In Vitro-In Vivo extrapolation of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Kyle C Ferguson; Yu-Syuan Luo; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Effects of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding on ceftriaxone kinetics.

Authors:  K Stoeckel; P J McNamara; R Brandt; H Plozza-Nottebrock; W H Ziegler
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Validation of a rapid equilibrium dialysis approach for the measurement of plasma protein binding.

Authors:  Nigel J Waters; Rachel Jones; Gareth Williams; Bindi Sohal
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  The application of solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) to the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  Amanda J King; James W Readman; John L Zhou
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.609

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk Characterization of Environmental Samples Using In Vitro Bioactivity and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations Data.

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Dillon Lloyd; Yi-Hui Zhou; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Grouping of UVCB substances with new approach methodologies (NAMs) data.

Authors:  John S House; Fabian A Grimm; William D Klaren; Abigail Dalzell; Srikeerthana Kuchi; Shu-Dong Zhang; Klaus Lenz; Peter J Boogaard; Hans B Ketelslegers; Timothy W Gant; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 6.043

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.