Literature DB >> 27770144

The importance of protein binding for the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE)-example of ibuprofen, a highly protein-bound substance.

H Mielke1, E Di Consiglio2, R Kreutz3, F Partosch4, E Testai2, U Gundert-Remy5,3.   

Abstract

A physiologically based human kinetic model (PBHKM) was used to predict the in vivo ibuprofen dose leading to the same concentration-time profile as measured in cultured human hepatic cells (Truisi et al. in Toxicol Lett 233(2):172-186, 2015). We parameterized the PBHKM with data from an in vivo study. Tissue partition coefficients were calculated by an algorithm and also derived from the experimental in vitro data for the liver. The predicted concentration-time profile in plasma was in excellent agreement with human experimental data when the liver partition coefficient was calculated by the algorithm (3.01) demonstrating values in line with findings obtained from human postmortem tissues. The results were less adequate when the liver partition coefficient was based on the experimental in vitro data (11.1). The in vivo doses necessary to reach the in vitro concentrations in the liver cells were 3610 mg using the best fitting model with a liver partition coefficient of 3.01 compared to 2840 mg with the in vitro liver partition coefficient of 11.1. We found that this difference is possibly attributable to the difference between protein binding in vivo (99.9 %) and in vitro (nearly zero) as the partition coefficient is highly dependent on protein binding. Hence, the fraction freely diffusible in the liver tissue is several times higher in vitro than in vivo. In consequence, when extrapolating from in vitro to in vivo liver toxicity, it is important to consider non-intended in vitro/in vivo differences in the tissue concentration which may occur due to a low protein content of the medium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro–in vivo extrapolation; Reverse dosimetry; Role of protein binding in modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770144     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1863-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  4 in total

1.  In Vitro Bioavailability of the Hydrocarbon Fractions of Dimethyl Sulfoxide Extracts of Petroleum Substances.

Authors:  Yu-Syuan Luo; Kyle C Ferguson; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Influence of in Vitro Assay Setup on the Apparent Cytotoxic Potency of Benzalkonium Chlorides.

Authors:  Floris A Groothuis; Niels Timmer; Eystein Opsahl; Beate Nicol; Steven T J Droge; Bas J Blaauboer; Nynke I Kramer
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation by Physiologically Based Kinetic Modeling: Experience With Three Case Studies and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Engi Abdelhady Algharably; Emma Di Consiglio; Emanuela Testai; Francesca Pistollato; Hans Mielke; Ursula Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Integrating biokinetics and in vitro studies to evaluate developmental neurotoxicity induced by chlorpyrifos in human iPSC-derived neural stem cells undergoing differentiation towards neuronal and glial cells.

Authors:  Emma Di Consiglio; Francesca Pistollato; Emilio Mendoza-De Gyves; Anna Bal-Price; Emanuela Testai
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.143

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.