| Literature DB >> 32019058 |
Dwin Grashof1, Christina N Zdenek1, James S Dobson1, Nicholas J Youngman1, Francisco Coimbra1, Melisa Benard-Valle2, Alejandro Alagon2, Bryan G Fry1.
Abstract
Envenomations are complex medical emergencies that can have a range of symptoms and sequelae. The only specific, scientifically-validated treatment for envenomation is antivenom administration, which is designed to alleviate venom effects. A paucity of efficacy testing exists for numerous antivenoms worldwide, and understanding venom effects and venom potency can help identify antivenom improvement options. Some spider venoms can produce debilitating injuries or even death, yet have been largely neglected in venom and antivenom studies because of the low venom yields. Coagulation disturbances have been particularly under studied due to difficulties in working with blood and the coagulation cascade. These circumstances have resulted in suboptimal spider bite treatment for medically significant spider genera such as Loxosceles and Sicarius. This study identifies and quantifies the anticoagulant effects produced by venoms of three Loxoscles species (L. reclusa, L. boneti, and L. laeta) and that of Sicarius terrosus. We showed that the venoms of all studied species are able to cleave the fibrinogen Aα-chain with varying degrees of potency, with L. reclusa and S. terrosus venom cleaving the Aα-chain most rapidly. Thromboelastography analysis revealed that only L. reclusa venom is able to reduce clot strength, thereby presumably causing anticoagulant effects in the patient. Using the same thromboelastography assays, antivenom efficacy tests revealed that the commonly used Loxoscles-specific SMase D recombinant based antivenom failed to neutralize the anticoagulant effects produced by Loxosceles venom. This study demonstrates the fibrinogenolytic activity of Loxosceles and Sicarius venom and the neutralization failure of Loxosceles antivenom, thus providing impetus for antivenom improvement.Entities:
Keywords: antivenom; coagulopathy; fibrinogen; spider; venom
Year: 2020 PMID: 32019058 PMCID: PMC7076800 DOI: 10.3390/toxins12020091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Representative one-dimensional (1D) SDS-PAGE gels showing time-dependent fibrinogen chain degradation (Aα, Bβ or γ) by venom (0.1 μg/μL) at 37 °C over 6 h. C: Negative controls using OK buffer as a blank in place of venom at 0 min and 6 h incubation times; V: Venom incubation over X hours; OK: Oklahoma; USA; TMP: Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Figure 2Graphical representation of percentage Aα-chain fibrinogen cleaved using the 1D SDS-PAGE gels from Figure 1. The percentage is derived from the color intensity of the bands, as quantified using ImageJ. Data points are n = 3 and the error bars show the standard deviation. OK: Oklahoma; USA; and TMP: Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Figure 3Overlaid thromboelastography traces showing the strength of fibrinogen clots with (red traces) and without (blue traces) venom. Blue traces: Negative controls (thrombin added after 30 min). The wider the trace, the stronger the clot, and vice versa. SP: Split point, time taken until clot begins to form (min); R: Time for initial clot formation where formation is ≥ 2 mm (min); A: Amplitude of clot (mm); MRTGG: Maximum rate of thrombus generation (dynes/cm2/s); TMRTG: Time to maximum rate of thrombus generation (min); TGG: Total thrombus generation (dynes/cm2). Overlaid traces are n = 3 for each set of controls or samples. Values are n = 3 means and standard deviation.
Figure 4(A) Thromboelastography traces of fibrinogen clots produced by spider venom (red) overlaid with spider venom + antivenom (blue), relative to the negative controls (antivenom only). Three concentrations of antivenom were used. SP: Split point, time taken until clot begins to form (mins); R: Time to initial clot formation where formation is > 2 mm (mins); A: Amplitude of clot (mm); MRTGG: Maximum rate of thrombus generation (dynes/cm2/s); TMRTG: Time to maximum rate of thrombus generation (min); TGG: Total thrombus generation (dynes/cm2). Venom/control overlaid traces are n = 3 for each set of controls or samples. Values are n = 3 means and standard deviation. (B) Overview of clot strength reduction of only venom and venom + AV. Blue bars: Negative control clot strength values from Figure 3 and clot strength values using only 3.8% AV control. Red bars: Clot strength values from L. reclusa TMP1 from Figure 3 and L. reclusa TMP1 + 3.8% AV. (C) Percentage of remaining clot strength relative to control after adding either L. reclusa TMP1 venom or L. reclusa TMP1 venom + 3.8% AV. The bars show the ratio of intact fibrinogen between the control and venom treatment for the first bar and ratio of intact fibrinogen between the 3.8% AV control and 3.8% AV + venom treatment. TMP: Tamaulipas, Mexico; Ns: Non-significant.
Figure 51D SDS-PAGE (reduced) gel comparisons: L: Ladder; rec O: L. reclusa OK; L. rec T: L. reclusa TMP2; L. bon: L. boneti; L. lae: L. laeta; S. ter: S. terrosus; OK: Oklahoma; USA; and TMP: Tamaulipas, Mexico.