| Literature DB >> 32016560 |
Julia Tolksdorf1, Raymund E Horch1, Jasmin S Grüner1, Rafael Schmid1, Annika Kengelbach-Weigand1, Dirk W Schubert2, Siegfried Werner2, Dominik Schneidereit3, Oliver Friedrich3, Ingo Ludolph4.
Abstract
Capsular contracture remains a challenge in plastic surgery and represents one of the most common postoperative complications following alloplastic breast reconstruction. The impact of the surface structure of silicone implants on the foreign body reaction and the behaviour of connective tissue-producing cells has already been discussed. The aim of this study was to investigate different pore sizes of silicone surfaces and their influence on human fibroblasts in an in vitro model. Four different textures (no, fine, medium and coarse texture) produced with the salt-loss technique, have been assessed in an in vitro model. Human fibroblasts were seeded onto silicone sheets and evaluated after 1, 4 and 7 days microscopically, with viability assay and gene expression analysis. Comparing the growth behaviour and adhesion of the fibroblasts on the four different textures, a dense cell layer, good adhesion and bridge-building ability of the cells could be observed for the fine and medium texture. Cell number and viability of the cells were increasing during the time course of experiments on every texture. TGFß1 was lowest expressed on the fine and medium texture indicating a trend for decreased fibrotic activity. For silicone surfaces produced with the salt-loss technique, we were able to show an antifibrotic effect of smaller sized pores. These findings underline the hypothesis of a key role of the implant surface and the pore size and pore structure in preventing capsular contracture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32016560 PMCID: PMC6997250 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-6360-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med ISSN: 0957-4530 Impact factor: 3.896
Primer sequences for qPCR
| Gene | Forward primer (5’-3’) | Reverse Primer (3’-5’) |
|---|---|---|
| TCCACCCATGGCAAATTCCA | TTCCCGTTCTCAGCCTTGAC | |
| CATGGAGGACCTGGATGCC | TCCTGAAGACTCCCCAGACC | |
| GCACCATCATTTCCACGAGC | AGTGGTTTGGATGGTGCCAA | |
| GGTGAAAGAGGATCTGAGGGC | AACACCACCACAGCAAGGA | |
| GCCGTGTTTGCCATCTGTTT | AGCAGACACCATCACCTGTG | |
| TCTCGACATCGAGGACCCAT | TGGACCCAGTCGAAACCCTTG |
Fig. 1DAPI overview images of the different surface textures on d1, d4 and d7 (scale bar: 1 mm). Irregular cell distribution in the control (no texture). Dense cell growth in the fine and medium texture. Sponge-like cell growth in the coarse texture
Fig. 2Representative scanning electron images of the 4 textures without fibroblasts, respectively, in 500-fold magnification (scale bar: 20 µm). Control (no texture) a, fine texture b, medium texture c, coarse texture d
Fig. 3Representative multi-photon microscopy images of bridge-building fibroblasts on fine a and medium texture b; “Floating” fibroblasts on coarse texture c
Fig. 4Gene expression 2−ΔCt of COL1, COL3 a, TIMP2, MMP2 b and TGFβ1 c in fibroblasts cultivated for seven days on different silicone textures. Highest values for COL1 in medium and coarse, for COL3 in the medium texture. Highest expression rate for MMP2 in fine, TIMP2 shows homogenous data. Highest values for TGFβ1 in control and coarse texture