Literature DB >> 24248559

Porous implants modulate healing and induce shifts in local macrophage polarization in the foreign body reaction.

Eric M Sussman1, Michelle C Halpin, Jeanot Muster, Randall T Moon, Buddy D Ratner.   

Abstract

The foreign body reaction (FBR) to implanted materials is of critical importance when medical devices require biological integration and vascularization to support their proper function (e.g., transcutaneous devices, implanted drug delivery systems, tissue replacements, and sensors). One class of materials that improves FBR outcomes is made by sphere-templating, resulting in porous structures with uniform, interconnected 34 μm pores. With these materials we observe reduced fibrosis and increased vascularization. We hypothesized that improved healing is a result of a shift in macrophage polarization, often measured as the ratio of M1 pro-inflammatory cells to M2 pro-healing cells. In this study, macrophage polarity of 34 μm porous implants was compared to non-porous and 160 μm porous implants in subcutaneous mouse tissue. Immunohistochemistry revealed that macrophages in implant pores displayed a shift towards an M1 phenotype compared to externalized cells. Macrophages in 34 μm porous implants had up to 63% greater expression of M1 markers and up to 85% reduction in M2 marker expression (p < 0.05). Macrophages immediately outside the porous structure, in contrast, showed a significant enrichment in M2 phenotypic cells. This study supports a role for macrophage polarization in driving the FBR to implanted materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24248559     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0933-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  110 in total

1.  Engineering macrophages to control the inflammatory response and angiogenesis.

Authors:  K V Eaton; H L Yang; C M Giachelli; M Scatena
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Materials to Promote Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Kevin Erning; Tatiana Segura
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-04-13

3.  Macrophage polarization in response to ECM coated polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Christopher L Dearth; Christian A Ranallo; Samuel T LoPresti; Lisa E Carey; Kerry A Daly; Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Progress on Modulating Tumor-Associated Macrophages with Biomaterials.

Authors:  Meilyn Sylvestre; Courtney A Crane; Suzie H Pun
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Sequential delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance vascularization of bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Kara L Spiller; Sina Nassiri; Claire E Witherel; Rachel R Anfang; Johnathan Ng; Kenneth R Nakazawa; Tony Yu; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Preclinical Performance Evaluation of Percutaneous Glucose Biosensors: Experimental Considerations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-17

Review 7.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Biomimetic Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Johnathan Ng; Kara Spiller; Jonathan Bernhard; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 9.  Effects of age-related shifts in cellular function and local microenvironment upon the innate immune response to implants.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Martin J Haschak; Samuel T Lopresti; Elizabeth C Stahl
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 11.130

10.  Design Considerations for Silica-Particle-Doped Nitric-Oxide-Releasing Polyurethane Glucose Biosensor Membranes.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jonathon B Schofield; Shaylyn E Walter; Maggie J Malone-Povolny; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 7.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.