Literature DB >> 14984750

Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano-topography and fibroblast filopodia.

M J Dalby1, M O Riehle, H Johnstone, S Affrossman, A S G Curtis.   

Abstract

Having the ability to control cell behaviour would be of great advantage in tissue engineering. One method of gaining control over cell adhesion, proliferation, guidance and differentiation is use of topography. Whilst it has be known for some time that cells can be guided by micro-topography, it is only recently becoming clear that cells will respond strongly to nano-scale topography. The fact that cells will take cues from their micro- and nano-environment suggests that the cells are in some way 'spatially aware'. It is likely that cells probe the shape of their surroundings using filopodia, and that this initial filopodia/topography interaction may be critical to down-stream cell reactions to biomaterials, or indeed, the extracellular matrix. One intriguing question is how small a feature can cells sense? In order to investigate the limits of cell sensing, high-resolution scanning electron microscopy has been used to simultaneously view cell filopodia and 10 nm high nano-islands. Fluorescence microscopy has also been used to look at adhesion formation. The results showed distinct filopodial/nano-island interaction and changes in adhesion morphology.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14984750     DOI: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2003.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Int        ISSN: 1065-6995            Impact factor:   3.612


  68 in total

1.  Cytocompatibility of novel tin oxide thin films.

Authors:  N Rushe; M Ball; W M Carroll; S Healy; J McManus; D Cunningham
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Cell orientation by a microgrooved substrate can be predicted by automatic control theory.

Authors:  Ralf Kemkemer; Simon Jungbauer; Dieter Kaufmann; Hans Gruler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading.

Authors:  M J P Biggs; R G Richards; N Gadegaard; C D W Wilkinson; M J Dalby
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Skeletal muscle tissue engineering: methods to form skeletal myotubes and their applications.

Authors:  Serge Ostrovidov; Vahid Hosseini; Samad Ahadian; Toshinori Fujie; Selvakumar Prakash Parthiban; Murugan Ramalingam; Hojae Bae; Hirokazu Kaji; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Effects of compressive residual stress on the morphologic changes of fibroblasts.

Authors:  Shu-Li Lin; Jen-Chang Yang; Kuo-Ning Ho; Chau-Hsiang Wang; Chien-Wu Yeh; Haw-Ming Huang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Perspective: Flicking with flow: Can microfluidics revolutionize the cancer research?

Authors:  Tamal Das; Suman Chakraborty
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Tantalum coating on TiO2 nanotubes induces superior rate of matrix mineralization and osteofunctionality in human osteoblasts.

Authors:  Christine J Frandsen; Karla S Brammer; Kunbae Noh; Gary Johnston; Sungho Jin
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Patterning of novel breast implant surfaces by enhancing silicone biocompatibility, using biomimetic topographies.

Authors:  S Barr; E Hill; A Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-04-26

9.  Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility.

Authors:  S Barr; E Hill; A Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-16

Review 10.  Cellular response to low adhesion nanotopographies.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.