Julia Adler-Milstein1, Wendi Zhao1, Rachel Willard-Grace2, Margae Knox2, Kevin Grumbach2. 1. Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study sought to determine whether objective measures of electronic health record (EHR) use-related to time, volume of work, and proficiency-are associated with either or both components of clinician burnout: exhaustion and cynicism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combined Maslach Burnout Inventory survey measures (94% response rate; 122 of 130 clinicians) with objective, vendor-defined EHR use measures from log files (time after hours on clinic days; time on nonclinic days; message volume; composite measures of efficiency and proficiency). Data were collected in early 2018 from all primary care clinics of a large, urban, academic medical center. Multivariate regression models measured the association between each burnout component and each EHR use measure. RESULTS: One-third (34%) of clinicians had high cynicism and 51% had high emotional exhaustion. Clinicians in the top 2 quartiles of EHR time after hours on scheduled clinic days (those above the sample median of 68 minutes per clinical full-time equivalent per week) had 4.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-20.1; P = .04) and 12.52 (95% CI, 2.6-61; P = .002) greater odds of high exhaustion. Clinicians in the top quartile of message volume (>307 messages per clinical full-time equivalent per week) had 6.17 greater odds of high exhaustion (95% CI, 1.1-41; P = .04). No measures were associated with high cynicism. DISCUSSION: EHRs have been cited as a contributor to clinician burnout, and self-reported data suggest a relationship between EHR use and burnout. As organizations increasingly rely on objective, vendor-defined EHR measures to design and evaluate interventions to reduce burnout, our findings point to the measures that should be targeted. CONCLUSIONS: Two specific EHR use measures were associated with exhaustion.
OBJECTIVES: The study sought to determine whether objective measures of electronic health record (EHR) use-related to time, volume of work, and proficiency-are associated with either or both components of clinician burnout: exhaustion and cynicism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combined Maslach Burnout Inventory survey measures (94% response rate; 122 of 130 clinicians) with objective, vendor-defined EHR use measures from log files (time after hours on clinic days; time on nonclinic days; message volume; composite measures of efficiency and proficiency). Data were collected in early 2018 from all primary care clinics of a large, urban, academic medical center. Multivariate regression models measured the association between each burnout component and each EHR use measure. RESULTS: One-third (34%) of clinicians had high cynicism and 51% had high emotional exhaustion. Clinicians in the top 2 quartiles of EHR time after hours on scheduled clinic days (those above the sample median of 68 minutes per clinical full-time equivalent per week) had 4.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-20.1; P = .04) and 12.52 (95% CI, 2.6-61; P = .002) greater odds of high exhaustion. Clinicians in the top quartile of message volume (>307 messages per clinical full-time equivalent per week) had 6.17 greater odds of high exhaustion (95% CI, 1.1-41; P = .04). No measures were associated with high cynicism. DISCUSSION: EHRs have been cited as a contributor to clinician burnout, and self-reported data suggest a relationship between EHR use and burnout. As organizations increasingly rely on objective, vendor-defined EHR measures to design and evaluate interventions to reduce burnout, our findings point to the measures that should be targeted. CONCLUSIONS: Two specific EHR use measures were associated with exhaustion.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Omar Hasan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Christine Sinsky; Daniel Satele; Jeff Sloan; Colin P West Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Colin P West; Christine Sinsky; Mickey Trockel; Michael Tutty; Daniel V Satele; Lindsey E Carlasare; Lotte N Dyrbye Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Amber Sieja; Katie Markley; Jonathan Pell; Christine Gonzalez; Brian Redig; Patrick Kneeland; Chen-Tan Lin Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Shasha Han; Tait D Shanafelt; Christine A Sinsky; Karim M Awad; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Lynne C Fiscus; Mickey Trockel; Joel Goh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rebekah L Gardner; Emily Cooper; Jacqueline Haskell; Daniel A Harris; Sara Poplau; Philip J Kroth; Mark Linzer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Brian G Arndt; John W Beasley; Michelle D Watkinson; Jonathan L Temte; Wen-Jan Tuan; Christine A Sinsky; Valerie J Gilchrist Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Christine Sinsky; Lacey Colligan; Ling Li; Mirela Prgomet; Sam Reynolds; Lindsey Goeders; Johanna Westbrook; Michael Tutty; George Blike Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rebecca L Curran; Polina V Kukhareva; Teresa Taft; Charlene R Weir; Thomas J Reese; Claude Nanjo; Salvador Rodriguez-Loya; Douglas K Martin; Phillip B Warner; David E Shields; Michael C Flynn; Jonathan P Boltax; Kensaku Kawamoto Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jennifer R Simpson; Chen-Tan Lin; Amber Sieja; Stefan H Sillau; Jonathan Pell Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Elizabeth R Pfoh; Sandra Hong; Laura Baranek; Michael B Rothberg; Sarah Beinkampen; Anita D Misra-Hebert; Susan J Rehm; Andrea L Sikon Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Edward R Melnick; Colin P West; Bidisha Nath; Pamela F Cipriano; Cheryl Peterson; Daniel V Satele; Tait Shanafelt; Liselotte N Dyrbye Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Franck Diaz-Garelli; Roy Strowd; Tamjeed Ahmed; Thomas W Lycan; Sean Daley; Brian J Wells; Umit Topaloglu Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2021-05