Literature DB >> 27595430

Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 Specialties.

Christine Sinsky1, Lacey Colligan1, Ling Li1, Mirela Prgomet1, Sam Reynolds1, Lindsey Goeders1, Johanna Westbrook1, Michael Tutty1, George Blike1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how physician time is allocated in ambulatory care.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how physician time is spent in ambulatory practice.
DESIGN: Quantitative direct observational time and motion study (during office hours) and self-reported diary (after hours).
SETTING: U.S. ambulatory care in 4 specialties in 4 states (Illinois, New Hampshire, Virginia, and Washington). PARTICIPANTS: 57 U.S. physicians in family medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, and orthopedics who were observed for 430 hours, 21 of whom also completed after-hours diaries. MEASUREMENTS: Proportions of time spent on 4 activities (direct clinical face time, electronic health record [EHR] and desk work, administrative tasks, and other tasks) and self-reported after-hours work.
RESULTS: During the office day, physicians spent 27.0% of their total time on direct clinical face time with patients and 49.2% of their time on EHR and desk work. While in the examination room with patients, physicians spent 52.9% of the time on direct clinical face time and 37.0% on EHR and desk work. The 21 physicians who completed after-hours diaries reported 1 to 2 hours of after-hours work each night, devoted mostly to EHR tasks. LIMITATIONS: Data were gathered in self-selected, high-performing practices and may not be generalizable to other settings. The descriptive study design did not support formal statistical comparisons by physician and practice characteristics.
CONCLUSION: For every hour physicians provide direct clinical face time to patients, nearly 2 additional hours is spent on EHR and desk work within the clinic day. Outside office hours, physicians spend another 1 to 2 hours of personal time each night doing additional computer and other clerical work. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: American Medical Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27595430     DOI: 10.7326/M16-0961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  271 in total

1.  Development of a care guidance index based on what matters to patients.

Authors:  John H Wasson; Laura Soloway; L Gordon Moore; Paul Labrec; Lynn Ho
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Effects of the Values and Options in Cancer Care Communication Intervention on Personal Caregiver Experiences of Cancer Care and Bereavement Outcomes.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Paul K Maciejewski; Ronald M Epstein; Joshua J Fenton; Benjamin Chapman; Sally A Norton; Michael Hoerger; Marsha N Wittink; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Supriya Mohile; Richard L Kravitz; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Incorporating Weight Management into Clinical Care for Cancer Survivors: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Rishi Jain; Crystal S Denlinger
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Inhaler use and education characteristics among English and non-English speaking patients: A pilot needs assessment survey.

Authors:  Sucharita Kher; Hillary Landau; Stephanie M Hon; Janis L Breeze; Nadine Al-Naamani; Jessica K Paulus; Andrew Martin; Rosemary Tsacoyianis
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-12-13

5.  Promoting Quality Face-to-Face Communication during Ophthalmology Encounters in the Electronic Health Record Era.

Authors:  Sally L Baxter; Helena E Gali; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Robert El-Kareh; Abigail E Huang; Heather E Chen; Andrew S Camp; Don O Kikkawa; Bobby S Korn; Jeffrey E Lee; Christopher A Longhurst; Marlene Millen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Forced Inefficiencies of the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Michael Weiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Practice Transformation Under the University of Colorado's Primary Care Redesign Model.

Authors:  Peter Chabot Smith; Corey Lyon; Aimee F English; Colleen Conry
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Breadcrumbs: Assessing the Feasibility of Automating Provider Documentation Using Electronic Health Record Activity.

Authors:  Leigh Anne Tang; Kevin B Johnson; Yaa A Kumah-Crystal
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

9.  Use of Chronic Care Management Codes for Medicare Beneficiaries: a Missed Opportunity?

Authors:  Rebekah L Gardner; Rouba Youssef; Blake Morphis; Alyssa DaCunha; Kimberly Pelland; Emily Cooper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Beyond Discharge Summaries: Communication Preferences in Care Transitions Between Hospitalists and Primary Care Providers Using Electronic Medical Records.

Authors:  Amy Munchhof; Rachel Gruber; Kathleen A Lane; Na Bo; Nicholas A Rattray
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.