Rebekah L Gardner1,2, Emily Cooper2, Jacqueline Haskell2, Daniel A Harris2,3, Sara Poplau4, Philip J Kroth5, Mark Linzer6. 1. Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 2. Healthcentric Advisors, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract
Objective: To quantify how stress related to use of health information technology (HIT) predicts burnout among physicians. Methods: All 4197 practicing physicians in Rhode Island were surveyed in 2017 on their HIT use. Our main outcome was self-reported burnout. The presence of HIT-related stress was defined by report of at least 1 of the following: poor/marginal time for documentation, moderately high/excessive time spent on the electronic health record (EHR) at home, and agreement that using an EHR adds to daily frustration. We used logistic regression to assess the association between each HIT-related stress measure and burnout, adjusting for respondent demographics, practice characteristics, and the other stress measures. Results: Of the 1792 physician respondents (43% response rate), 26% reported burnout. Among EHR users (91%), 70% reported HIT-related stress, with the highest prevalence in primary care-oriented specialties. After adjustment, physicians reporting poor/marginal time for documentation had 2.8 times the odds of burnout (95% CI: 2.0-4.1; P < .0001), compared to those reporting sufficient time. Physicians reporting moderately high/excessive time on EHRs at home had 1.9 times the odds of burnout (95% CI: 1.4-2.8; P < .0001), compared to those with minimal/no EHR use at home. Those who agreed that EHRs add to their daily frustration had 2.4 times the odds of burnout (95% CI: 1.6-3.7; P < .0001), compared to those who disagreed. Conclusion: HIT-related stress is measurable, common (about 70% among respondents), specialty-related, and independently predictive of burnout symptoms. Identifying HIT-specific factors associated with burnout may guide healthcare organizations seeking to measure and remediate burnout among their physicians and staff.
Objective: To quantify how stress related to use of health information technology (HIT) predicts burnout among physicians. Methods: All 4197 practicing physicians in Rhode Island were surveyed in 2017 on their HIT use. Our main outcome was self-reported burnout. The presence of HIT-related stress was defined by report of at least 1 of the following: poor/marginal time for documentation, moderately high/excessive time spent on the electronic health record (EHR) at home, and agreement that using an EHR adds to daily frustration. We used logistic regression to assess the association between each HIT-related stress measure and burnout, adjusting for respondent demographics, practice characteristics, and the other stress measures. Results: Of the 1792 physician respondents (43% response rate), 26% reported burnout. Among EHR users (91%), 70% reported HIT-related stress, with the highest prevalence in primary care-oriented specialties. After adjustment, physicians reporting poor/marginal time for documentation had 2.8 times the odds of burnout (95% CI: 2.0-4.1; P < .0001), compared to those reporting sufficient time. Physicians reporting moderately high/excessive time on EHRs at home had 1.9 times the odds of burnout (95% CI: 1.4-2.8; P < .0001), compared to those with minimal/no EHR use at home. Those who agreed that EHRs add to their daily frustration had 2.4 times the odds of burnout (95% CI: 1.6-3.7; P < .0001), compared to those who disagreed. Conclusion:HIT-related stress is measurable, common (about 70% among respondents), specialty-related, and independently predictive of burnout symptoms. Identifying HIT-specific factors associated with burnout may guide healthcare organizations seeking to measure and remediate burnout among their physicians and staff.
Authors: E S Williams; T R Konrad; M Linzer; J McMurray; D E Pathman; M Gerrity; M D Schwartz; W E Scheckler; J Van Kirk; E Rhodes; J Douglas Journal: Med Care Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Rosa R Baier; Rebekah L Gardner; Jay S Buechner; Yael Harris; Samara Viner-Brown; Deidre S Gifford Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Eric S Williams; Thomas R Konrad; William E Scheckler; Donald E Pathman; Mark Linzer; Julia E McMurray; Martha Gerrity; Mark Schwartz Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2010 Apr-Jun
Authors: R Scott McCain; Nicola McKinley; Martin Dempster; W Jeffrey Campbell; Stephen J Kirk Journal: Postgrad Med J Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Brian G Arndt; John W Beasley; Michelle D Watkinson; Jonathan L Temte; Wen-Jan Tuan; Christine A Sinsky; Valerie J Gilchrist Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Christine A Sinsky; Lotte N Dyrbye; Colin P West; Daniel Satele; Michael Tutty; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Chen Yan; Susannah Rose; Michael B Rothberg; Mary Beth Mercer; Kenneth Goodman; Anita D Misra-Hebert Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carolyn S Dewa; Desmond Loong; Sarah Bonato; Nguyen Xuan Thanh; Philip Jacobs Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mustafa I Hussain; Mayara Costa Figueiredo; Brian D Tran; Zhaoyuan Su; Stephen Molldrem; Elizabeth V Eikey; Yunan Chen Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Mustafa I Hussain; Ariana M Nelson; Brent G Yeung; Lauren Sukumar; Kai Zheng Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497