| Literature DB >> 32013102 |
Alessia Vignoli1,2, Elena Muraro3, Gianmaria Miolo4, Leonardo Tenori1,2, Paola Turano1,5, Emanuela Di Gregorio3, Agostino Steffan3, Claudio Luchinat1,2,5, Giuseppe Corona3.
Abstract
HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) represents a heterogeneous cancer disease. In an attempt to identify new stratification models useful for prognosis and therapeutic strategy, we investigated the influence of estrogen receptor (ER) status on the host immune and metabolomics profile of HER2-positive BC patients enrolled for neoadjuvant targeted chemotherapy (NATC). The study enrolled 43 HER2-positive BC patients eligible for NATC based on the trastuzumab-paclitaxel combination. Baseline circulatory cytokines and 1H NMR plasma metabolomics profiles were investigated. Differences in the immune cytokines and metabolomics profile as a function of the ER status, and their association with clinical outcomes were studied by multivariate and univariate analysis. Baseline metabolomics profiles were found to discriminate HER2-positive ER(+) from ER(-) BC patients. Within the ER(+) group an immune-metabolomics model, based on TNF-α and valine, predicted pathological complete response to NATC with 90.9% accuracy (AUROC = 0.92, p = 0.004). Moreover, metabolomics information integrated with IL-2 and IL-10 cytokine levels were prognostic of relapse with an accuracy of 95.5%. The results indicate that in HER2-positive BC patients the ER status influences the host circulatory immune-metabolomics profile. The baseline immune-metabolomics assessment in combination with ER status could represent an independent stratification tool able to predict NATC response and disease relapse of HER2-positive patients.Entities:
Keywords: HER2-positive; breast cancer; cytokines; estrogen receptors; metabolomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32013102 PMCID: PMC7072610 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the HER2-positive patients as a function of the ER status.
| Characteristic | ER (−) | ER (+) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Median (range) | 48 (28–70) | 49 (23–68) | 0.878 * |
|
| |||
| Mean ± SD | 24.1 ± 9.0 | 26.6 ± 6.1 | 0.19 |
|
| |||
| IIA | 4 | 2 | |
| IIB | 13 | 14 | 0.443 # |
| IIIA | 4 | 4 | |
| IIIB | 0 | 2 | |
|
| |||
| G2 | 4 | 4 | |
| G3 | 16 | 17 | 0.444 |
| GX § | 1 | 1 | |
|
| |||
| <20 | 10 | 9 | 0.097 |
| ≥20 | 11 | 13 | |
|
| |||
| Complete | 13 | 11 | 0.432 |
| Partial | 8 | 11 | |
| Yes | 3 | 8 | 0.097 |
§ unclassified, * t-Test, # chi-squared test.
Figure 1PCA-CA of 1H NMR CPMG spectra of baseline plasma samples from HER2-positive ER(+) (cyan) and ER(−) (red) breast cancer patients. Score plot of the first two PCA-CA components (A) and loading plot of PC1 (B). Model LOOCV accuracy of 74.4%, p-value = 0.005.
Figure 2PCA-CA of 1H NMR CPMG spectra of baseline plasma samples from patients who achieved complete pathological response (GR, green) and partial responders (PR, purple) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER(+) (A) and ER(−) subtypes (B). ER(+) model showed LOOCV accuracy of 72.7%, p-value = 0.047, ER(−) model showed LOOCV accuracy of 63.2%, p-value = 0.143.
Figure 3ROC curves of valine (A) and TNF-α (B) diagnostic power to distinguish ER(+) patients who achieve pathological response (GR) from those who achieve only a partial response (PR) to NATC treatment. The ROC curve of the combined linear model VAL+TNF-α (C) shows improved diagnostic power.
Figure 4(A) PCA-CA of 1H NMR CPMG spectra of baseline plasma samples from ER(+) patients who developed disease recurrence (orange) and those who were disease free at 10 years (blue). Model LOOCV accuracy of 76.3%, p-value = 0.020. (B) ROC curve of the linear combination of IL-2 and IL-10 to distinguish relapsed and not relapsed ER(+) patients.