BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor (ER) remains one of the most important biomarkers for breast cancer subtyping and prognosis, and comparative genome hybridization has greatly contributed to the understanding of global genetic imbalance. The authors used single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to compare overall copy number aberrations (CNAs) as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the entire human genome in ER-positive and ER-negative breast carcinomas. METHODS: DNA was extracted from frozen tumor sections of 21 breast carcinoma specimens and analyzed with a proprietary 50K XbaI SNP array. Copy number and LOH probability values were derived for each sample. Data were analyzed using bioinformatics and computational software, and permutation tests were used to estimate the significance of these values. RESULTS: There was a global increase in CNAs and LOH in ER-negative relative to ER-positive cancers. Gain of the long arm of chromosome 1 (1q) and 8q were the most obvious changes common in both subtypes: An increase in the chromosome 1 short arm (1p)/1q ratio was observed in ER-negative samples, and an increased 16p/16q ratio was observed in ER-positive samples. Significant CNAs (adjusted P<.05) in ER-negative relative to ER-positive tumors included 5q deletion, loss of 15q, and gain of 2p and 21q. Copy-neutral LOH (cnLOH) common to both ER-positive and ER-negative samples included 9p21, the p16 tumor suppressor locus, and 4q13, the RCHY1 (ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain-containing 1) oncogene locus. Of particular interest was an enrichment of 17q LOH among the ER-negative tumors, potentially suggesting breast cancer 1 gene (BRCA1) mutations. CONCLUSIONS: SNP array detected both genetic imbalances and cnLOH and was capable of discriminating ER-negative breast cancer from ER-positive breast cancer. 2010 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND:Estrogen receptor (ER) remains one of the most important biomarkers for breast cancer subtyping and prognosis, and comparative genome hybridization has greatly contributed to the understanding of global genetic imbalance. The authors used single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to compare overall copy number aberrations (CNAs) as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the entire human genome in ER-positive and ER-negative breast carcinomas. METHODS: DNA was extracted from frozen tumor sections of 21 breast carcinoma specimens and analyzed with a proprietary 50K XbaI SNP array. Copy number and LOH probability values were derived for each sample. Data were analyzed using bioinformatics and computational software, and permutation tests were used to estimate the significance of these values. RESULTS: There was a global increase in CNAs and LOH in ER-negative relative to ER-positive cancers. Gain of the long arm of chromosome 1 (1q) and 8q were the most obvious changes common in both subtypes: An increase in the chromosome 1 short arm (1p)/1q ratio was observed in ER-negative samples, and an increased 16p/16q ratio was observed in ER-positive samples. Significant CNAs (adjusted P<.05) in ER-negative relative to ER-positive tumors included 5q deletion, loss of 15q, and gain of 2p and 21q. Copy-neutral LOH (cnLOH) common to both ER-positive and ER-negative samples included 9p21, the p16tumor suppressor locus, and 4q13, the RCHY1 (ring finger and CHY zinc finger domain-containing 1) oncogene locus. Of particular interest was an enrichment of 17q LOH among the ER-negative tumors, potentially suggesting breast cancer 1 gene (BRCA1) mutations. CONCLUSIONS: SNP array detected both genetic imbalances and cnLOH and was capable of discriminating ER-negative breast cancer from ER-positive breast cancer. 2010 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Joan Climent; Peter Dimitrow; Jane Fridlyand; Jose Palacios; Reiner Siebert; Donna G Albertson; Joe W Gray; Daniel Pinkel; Ana Lluch; Jose A Martinez-Climent Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Koei Chin; Sandy DeVries; Jane Fridlyand; Paul T Spellman; Ritu Roydasgupta; Wen-Lin Kuo; Anna Lapuk; Richard M Neve; Zuwei Qian; Tom Ryder; Fanqing Chen; Heidi Feiler; Taku Tokuyasu; Chris Kingsley; Shanaz Dairkee; Zhenhang Meng; Karen Chew; Daniel Pinkel; Ajay Jain; Britt Marie Ljung; Laura Esserman; Donna G Albertson; Frederic M Waldman; Joe W Gray Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Fabrice Andre; Bastien Job; Philippe Dessen; Attila Tordai; Stefan Michiels; Cornelia Liedtke; Catherine Richon; Kai Yan; Bailang Wang; Gilles Vassal; Suzette Delaloge; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Vladimir Lazar; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ana-Maria Dancau; Laura Wuth; Marcel Waschow; Frederik Holst; Antje Krohn; Matthias Choschzick; Luigi Terracciano; Sotirios Politis; Stefan Kurtz; Annette Lebeau; Kay Friedrichs; Katharina Wencke; Outi Monni; Ronald Simon Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Andrea L Richardson; Zhigang C Wang; Arcangela De Nicolo; Xin Lu; Myles Brown; Alexander Miron; Xiaodong Liao; J Dirk Iglehart; David M Livingston; Shridar Ganesan Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: L W M Loo; C Ton; Y-W Wang; D I Grove; H Bouzek; N Vartanian; M-G Lin; X Yuan; T L Lawton; J R Daling; K E Malone; C I Li; L Hsu; P L Porter Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Rachael Natrajan; Maryou B K Lambros; Felipe C Geyer; Caterina Marchio; David S P Tan; Radost Vatcheva; Kai-Keen Shiu; Daniela Hungermann; Socorro Maria Rodriguez-Pinilla; Jose Palacios; Alan Ashworth; Horst Buerger; Jorge S Reis-Filho Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Antonio F Santidrian; Sarah E LeBoeuf; Erik D Wold; Melissa Ritland; Jane S Forsyth; Brunhilde H Felding Journal: DNA Repair (Amst) Date: 2014-09-26
Authors: Brionna Y Hair; Melissa A Troester; Sharon N Edmiston; Eloise A Parrish; Whitney R Robinson; Michael C Wu; Andrew F Olshan; Theresa Swift-Scanlan; Kathleen Conway Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: R Nadal; M Salido; L Nonell; M Rodríguez-Rivera; E Puigdecanet; J L Garcia-Puche; M Macià; J M Corominas; M J Serrano; J A Lorente; F Solé Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2014-10-07