Literature DB >> 23993780

Molecular and cellular heterogeneity in breast cancer: challenges for personalized medicine.

Ashley G Rivenbark1, Siobhan M O'Connor1, William B Coleman2.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is noted for disparate clinical behaviors and patient outcomes, despite common histopathological features at diagnosis. Molecular pathogenesis studies suggest that breast cancer is a collection of diseases with variable molecular underpinnings that modulate therapeutic responses, disease-free intervals, and long-term survival. Traditional therapeutic strategies for individual patients are guided by the expression status of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although such methods for clinical classification have utility in selection of targeted therapies, short-term patient responses and long-term survival remain difficult to predict. Molecular signatures of breast cancer based on complex gene expression patterns have utility in prediction of long-term patient outcomes, but are not yet used for guiding therapy. Examination of the correspondence between these methods for breast cancer classification reveals a lack of agreement affecting a significant percentage of cases. To realize true personalized breast cancer therapy, a more complete analysis and evaluation of the molecular characteristics of the disease in the individual patient is required, together with an understanding of the contributions of specific genetic and epigenetic alterations (and their combinations) to management of the patient. Here, we discuss the molecular and cellular heterogeneity of breast cancer, the impact of this heterogeneity on practical breast cancer classification, and the challenges for personalized breast cancer treatment.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993780      PMCID: PMC5691324          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  95 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation.

Authors:  Amir Eden; François Gaudet; Alpana Waghmare; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Next-generation sequencing in breast cancer: translational science and clinical integration.

Authors:  Milan Radovich
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  DNA methylation-dependent epigenetic regulation of gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Ashley G Rivenbark; Wendell D Jones; J Devon Risher; William B Coleman
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  Breast cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; G S Berkowitz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  DNA methylation-dependent silencing of CST6 in human breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Ashley G Rivenbark; Wendell D Jones; William B Coleman
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 7.  Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Xiaojiang Cui; Rachel Schiff; Grazia Arpino; C Kent Osborne; Adrian V Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Pitfalls in outcome prediction of breast cancer.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX genomic diagnostic test for recurrence prognosis and therapeutic response prediction in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Maureen Cronin; Chithra Sangli; Mei-Lan Liu; Mylan Pho; Debjani Dutta; Anhthu Nguyen; Jennie Jeong; Jenny Wu; Kim Clark Langone; Drew Watson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 10.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  89 in total

1.  Discovery of GNE-149 as a Full Antagonist and Efficient Degrader of Estrogen Receptor alpha for ER+ Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jun Liang; Robert Blake; Jae Chang; Lori S Friedman; Simon Goodacre; Steven Hartman; Ellen Rei Ingalla; James R Kiefer; Tracy Kleinheinz; Sharada Labadie; Jun Li; Kwong Wah Lai; Jiangpeng Liao; Vidhi Mody; Neville McLean; Ciara Metcalfe; Michelle Nannini; Daniel Otwine; Yingqing Ran; Nick Ray; Fabien Roussel; Amy Sambrone; Deepak Sampath; Maia Vinogradova; John Wai; Tao Wang; Kuen Yeap; Amy Young; Jason Zbieg; Birong Zhang; Xiaoping Zheng; Yu Zhong; Xiaojing Wang
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  α-Parvin promotes breast cancer progression and metastasis through interaction with G3BP2 and regulation of TWIST1 signaling.

Authors:  Ying Sun; Yanyan Ding; Chen Guo; Chengmin Liu; Ping Ma; Shuang Ma; Zhe Wang; Jie Liu; Tao Qian; Luyao Ma; Yi Deng; Chuanyue Wu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Enrichment of PI3K-AKT-mTOR Pathway Activation in Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Mariaelena Pierobon; Corinne Ramos; Shukmei Wong; K Alex Hodge; Jessica Aldrich; Sara Byron; Stephen P Anthony; Nicholas J Robert; Donald W Northfelt; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Linda Vocila; Julia Wulfkuhle; Guido Gambara; Rosa I Gallagher; Bryant Dunetz; Nicholas Hoke; Ting Dong; David W Craig; Massimo Cristofanilli; Brian Leyland-Jones; Lance A Liotta; Joyce A O'Shaughnessy; John D Carpten; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Targeted metabolomic profiling of low and high grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer tissues: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; Ali Yilmaz; Praveen Kumar; Onur Turkoglu; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Barry Rosen; Ray O Bahado-Singh; Stewart F Graham
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 4.290

5.  Decreased expression of SOX17 is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  De-Yuan Fu; Hao-Sheng Tan; Jin-Li Wei; Chang-Ren Zhu; Ji-Xin Jiang; Yu-Xiang Zhu; Feng-Lin Cai; Mei-Hong Chong; Chuan-Li Ren
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-14

6.  TES was epigenetically silenced and suppressed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yang Yongbin; Li Jinghua; Zhao Zhanxue; Zang Aimin; Jia Youchao; Shang Yanhong; Jiao Manjing
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-15

7.  Oncosis and apoptosis induction by activation of an overexpressed ion channel in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  A A Peters; S Y N Jamaludin; K T D S Yapa; S Chalmers; A P Wiegmans; H F Lim; M J G Milevskiy; I Azimi; F M Davis; K S Northwood; E Pera; D L Marcial; E Dray; N J Waterhouse; P J Cabot; T J Gonda; P A Kenny; M A Brown; K K Khanna; S J Roberts-Thomson; G R Monteith
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  The Role of micro RNAs in Breast Cancer Metastasis: Preclinical Validation and Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Ulrich H Weidle; Steffen Dickopf; Corinna Hintermair; Gwendlyn Kollmorgen; Fabian Birzele; Ulrich Brinkmann
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

9.  Serum levels of apolipoprotein E correlates with disease progression and poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiangdong Xu; Jianxin Wan; Linjing Yuan; Junhui Ba; Pinning Feng; Weiqing Long; Hao Huang; Pingjuan Liu; Yuesu Cai; Min Liu; Jinmei Luo; Laisheng Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-10-05

10.  Breast Biomarkers-Comparison on Whole Section and Tissue Microarray Section.

Authors:  Sneha S Chavan; Savithri Ravindra; Msn Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.