| Literature DB >> 32012902 |
Sandeep Malampati1, Ju-Xian Song1,2, Benjamin Chun-Kit Tong1, Anusha Nalluri1, Chuan-Bin Yang1, Ziying Wang1, Sravan Gopalkrishnashetty Sreenivasmurthy1, Zhou Zhu1, Jia Liu1, Chengfu Su1, Senthilkumar Krishnamoorthi1, Ashok Iyaswamy1, King-Ho Cheung1, Jia-Hong Lu3, And Min Li1.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases in older individuals with specific neuropsychiatric symptoms. It is a proteinopathy, pathologically characterized by the presence of misfolded protein (Aβ and Tau) aggregates in the brain, causing progressive dementia. Increasing studies have provided evidence that the defect in protein-degrading systems, especially the autophagy-lysosome pathway (ALP), plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. Recent studies have demonstrated that AD-associated protein aggregates can be selectively recognized by some receptors and then be degraded by ALP, a process termed aggrephagy. In this study, we reviewed the role of aggrephagy in AD development and discussed the strategy of promoting aggrephagy using small molecules for the treatment of AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; aggregates; aggrephagy; selective autophagy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32012902 PMCID: PMC7072705 DOI: 10.3390/cells9020311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Misfolded proteins degradation processes in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) proteolytic pathways are vulnerable to AD aggregates, and their impairment activates aggrephagy. The misfolded proteins with the KFERQ motif are recognized by HSC70 and recruited directly into lysosome via LAMP2a for degradation in CMA. In UPS the ubiquitinated misfolded proteins are degraded in proteasome. However, in AD, as these constitutive proteolytic pathways are vulnerable to the AD aggregates, aggrephagy is initiated. In aggrephagy, ubiquitinated aggregates, as well as their aggresomes are recognized by the aggrephagy receptors p62, Optineurin (OPTN), and neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1 (NBR1) and recruited eventually into the LC3-II containing double-membranous autophagosome. Further, this autophagosome fuses with the lysosome to form autolysosome and degrades these AD aggregates.
Figure 2Fast axonal transport impairment in AD. Impairment in the microtubule-dependent fast axonal transportation of misfolded protein aggregates and autophagy vacuoles from the neuronal distal end to the lysosome rich microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) leads to neuronal dystrophy in AD. Usually, HDAC6 recognizes ubiquitinated AD misfolded proteins p-Tau, Aβ, their aggregates, and autophagy vacuoles. Then they are retrogradely transported by the axonal microtubule motor/adaptor complex dynein/snapin for autophagic degradation in MTOC. However, in AD, retrograde axonal transportation impairment increases neuronal autophagy stress, causing p-Tau and Aβ aggregates, as well as these aggregates, filled autophagy vacuoles fusion with the plasma membrane resulting in neuronal dystrophy.
Figure 3Process and regulation of aggrephagy in AD. mTORC1 holds Transcription factor EB (TFEB) on the lysosome membrane in phosphorylated form (p-TFEB). Aggrephagy is induced by mTORC1 inhibition or mTORC1 dependent/independent pathways that lead to TFEB activation, i.e., TFEB dephosphorylation. Dephosphorylated TFEB translocates into the nucleus, enhances CLEAR genes transcription, and promotes autophagy and lysosomal biogenesis. In AD, ubiquitinated monomeric Aβ and p-Tau peptides form misfolded proteins. These polyubiquitinated misfolded proteins are recognized by aggrephagy receptors and recruited into the LC3-II containing phagophore or autophagosome, which transforms into autolysosome after fusion with the lysosome and degrades AD pathological aggregates. Lysosome acidification failure due to PS1) mutation or elevated CTFβ levels can be treated with lysosomes targeted acidic nanoparticles.
Aggrephagy enhancers for the treatment of AD.
| Compound | Mode of Action | Animal Model | Dose/Route | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curcumin | mTOR inhibition |
APP/PS1 |
1000 ppm/P.O. |
↓Aβ plaques, ↑Memory | [ |
| Rapamycin | mTOR inhibition |
PDAPP mice hAPP (J20) mice P301S mice |
2.24 mg/kg/P.O. 2.24 mg/kg/P.O. 15 mg/kg/I.P. |
↓Aβ plaques, ↑Memory ↓Cerebral amyloid angiopathy,↑Memory ↓Sarkosyl insoluble tau | [ |
| Temsirolimus | mTOR inhibition |
P301S mice Tg30 mice |
20 mg/kg/I.P. 0.2 mg/kg/I.P. |
↓Sarkosyl insoluble tau, ↑Memory ↓Sarkosyl insoluble tau, ↑Motor function | [ |
| Oleuropein | AMPK activation, mTOR inhibition |
TgCRND8 mice |
50 mg/kg/P.O. |
↓Aβ plaques, ↑Memory | [ |
| Methylene blue | mTOR inhibition |
JNPL3 mice |
0.02 mg/kg/P.O. |
↓Sarkosyl insoluble tau | [ |
| Ouabain | mTOR inhibition, TFEB activation |
P301L mice |
1.5 µgm/kg/I.P. |
↓Sarkosyl insoluble tau, ↑Memory | [ |
| Trehalose | TFEB activation |
P301S mice APP/PS1 mice |
2% Trehalose in drinking water 5 µL injected into brain lateral ventricles |
↓Sarkosyl insoluble tau, ↑Motor function ↓Aβ deposits, ↑Memory | [ |
| Pseudoginsenoside-F11 (PF-11) | TFEB activation |
SAMP8 mice |
32 mg/kg/P.O. |
↓Aβ plaques, ↑Memory | [ |
| Hep-14 | TFEB activation |
APP/PS1 mice |
5 mg/kg/I.P. |
↓Aβ plaques | [ |
| Aspirin | PPARGC1α mediated TFEB activation |
5xFAD mice |
2 mg/kg/P.O. |
↓Aβ plaques | [ |
| Cinnamic acid | PPARGC1α mediated TFEB activation |
5xFAD mice |
100 mg/kg/P.O. |
↓Aβ plaques, ↑Memory, ↑Open field exploration | [ |
P.O: Oral route; I.P: Intraperitoneal route; PPM: parts per million.