Literature DB >> 31996370

Risk of Prostate Cancer-related Death Following a Low PSA Level in the PLCO Trial.

Hormuzd A Katki1, Amanda Black2, Rebecca Landy2, Lauren C Houghton3, Christine D Berg1, Robert L Grubb4.   

Abstract

Longer-than-annual screening intervals have been suggested to improve the balance of benefits and harms in prostate cancer screening. Many researchers, societies, and guideline committees have suggested that screening intervals could depend on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) result. We analyzed data from men (N = 33,897) ages 55-74 years with a baseline PSA test in the intervention arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial (United States, 1993-2001). We estimated 5- and 10-year risks of aggressive cancer (Gleason ≥8 and/or stage III/IV) and 15-year risks of prostate cancer-related mortality for men with baseline PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL (N = 4,862), ≤1 ng/mL (N = 15,110), and 1.01-2.5 ng/mL (N = 12,422). A total of 217 men died from prostate cancer through 15 years, although no men with PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL died from prostate cancer within 5 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.00%-0.03%]. The 5-year incidence of aggressive disease was low (0.08%; 95% CI, 0.03%-0.12%) for men with PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL, and higher for men with baseline PSA 1.01-2.5 ng/mL (0.51%; 95% CI, 0.38%-0.74%). No men aged ≥65 years with PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL died from prostate cancer within 15 years (95% CI, 0.00%-0.32%), and their 10-year incidence of aggressive disease was low (0.25%; 95% CI, 0.00%-0.53%). Compared with white men, black men with PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL had higher 10-year rates of aggressive disease (1.6% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.01). Five-year screening intervals may be appropriate for the 45% of men with PSA ≤ 1 ng/mL. Men ages ≥65 years with PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/mL could consider stopping screening. Substantial risk disparities suggest appropriate screening intervals could depend on race/ethnicity. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31996370      PMCID: PMC7339970          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  35 in total

1.  Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Ruth Etzioni; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Lynn Greene; Lars Holmberg; Philip Kantoff; Badrinath R Konety; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David F Penson; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; Stacey A Fedewa; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley; Richard C Wender
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010.

Authors:  Andrew M D Wolf; Richard C Wender; Ruth B Etzioni; Ian M Thompson; Anthony V D'Amico; Robert J Volk; Durado D Brooks; Chiranjeev Dash; Idris Guessous; Kimberly Andrews; Carol DeSantis; Robert A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Jérémie Haffner; Laurent Lemaitre; Philippe Puech; Georges-Pascal Haber; Xavier Leroy; J Stephen Jones; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam).

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Dina W Roobol; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  A risk-based strategy improves prostate-specific antigen-driven detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ries Kranse; Tineke Wolters; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Chris H Bangma; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in Midlife Predict Lethal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Mark A Preston; Julie L Batista; Kathryn M Wilson; Sigrid V Carlsson; Travis Gerke; Daniel D Sjoberg; Douglas M Dahl; Howard D Sesso; Adam S Feldman; Peter H Gann; Adam S Kibel; Andrew J Vickers; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Serum prostate-specific antigen hemodilution among obese men undergoing screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Robert L Grubb; Amanda Black; Grant Izmirlian; Thomas P Hickey; Paul F Pinsky; Jerome E Mabie; Thomas L Riley; Lawrence R Ragard; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg; E David Crawford; Timothy R Church; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Strategy for detection of prostate cancer based on relation between prostate specific antigen at age 40-55 and long term risk of metastasis: case-control study.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; David Ulmert; Daniel D Sjoberg; Caroline J Bennette; Thomas Björk; Axel Gerdtsson; Jonas Manjer; Peter M Nilsson; Anders Dahlin; Anders Bjartell; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-04-15

10.  Risk factors for infection following prostate biopsy - a case control study.

Authors:  Elliot Anderson; Olivia Leahy; Allen C Cheng; Jeremy Grummet
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.