Literature DB >> 15708050

Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam).

Monique J Roobol1, Dina W Roobol, Fritz H Schröder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Currently, several prostate cancer rescreening intervals are in use in different countries worldwide, varying from 1 to 4 years. Recently, it has been proposed to determine the rescreening interval relative to the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and possibly to extend the rescreening interval up to 5 years.
METHODS: We evaluated the screening results of two subsequent screening visits (4-year interval) of 1703 men aged 55 to 65 years with an initial PSA level of 1.0 ng/mL or less within a randomized screening trial. We assessed the PSA values, numbers of men biopsied (biopsy indication: PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or greater), and numbers of cancers detected at the second and third screening visits.
RESULTS: A total of 1327 men (79.3%) attended the second screening visit. Of these men, 13 (0.98%) had a PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or greater, and three cancers were detected (cancer detection rate 0.23%). At the third screening visit, 1017 men (76.8%) attended, 34 men (3.3%) had a PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or greater, and five cancers were detected (cancer detection rate 0.49%). The 2344 subsequent PSA determinations in an 8-year period after the initial screening resulted in eight cancers detected, for an overall cancer detection rate of 0.47%. Through linkage of all men with the cancer registry, no additional cancers were found.
CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of PSA screening every 8 years for men with a PSA level of 1.0 ng/mL or less will lead to a considerable decrease in the number of screening visits (with the associated costs and stress), with a minimal risk of missing aggressive cancer at a curable stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15708050     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force Review.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Andrew J Vickers; Monique Roobol; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hans Lilja; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  [PSA 2010--the beginning of a new era in early detection of prostate cancer].

Authors:  C Börgermann; M Sieverding; P Fornara; M Graefen; P Hammerer; A Semjonow; F Schröder; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Trends in prostate specific antigen testing in Ireland: lessons from a country without guidelines.

Authors:  F J Drummond; A-E Carsin; L Sharp; H Comber
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening: who and how?

Authors:  Allison S Glass; K Clint Cary; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Screening for prostate cancer in the US? Reduce the harms and keep the benefit.

Authors:  Tiago M de Carvalho; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Predicting prostate cancer many years before diagnosis: how and why?

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Peter C Albertsen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for detection of disease in patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse following radical treatment of a local-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hakan Öztürk; Inanç Karapolat
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Algorithms, nomograms and the detection of indolent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.