Literature DB >> 20200110

American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010.

Andrew M D Wolf1, Richard C Wender, Ruth B Etzioni, Ian M Thompson, Anthony V D'Amico, Robert J Volk, Durado D Brooks, Chiranjeev Dash, Idris Guessous, Kimberly Andrews, Carol DeSantis, Robert A Smith.   

Abstract

In 2009, the American Cancer Society (ACS) Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee began the process of a complete update of recommendations for early prostate cancer detection. A series of systematic evidence reviews was conducted focusing on evidence related to the early detection of prostate cancer, test performance, harms of therapy for localized prostate cancer, and shared and informed decision making in prostate cancer screening. The results of the systematic reviews were evaluated by the ACS Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee, and deliberations about the evidence occurred at committee meetings and during conference calls. On the basis of the evidence and a consensus process, the Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee developed the guideline, and a writing committee drafted a guideline document that was circulated to the entire committee for review and revision. The document was then circulated to peer reviewers for feedback, and finally to the ACS Mission Outcomes Committee and the ACS Board of Directors for approval. The ACS recommends that asymptomatic men who have at least a 10-year life expectancy have an opportunity to make an informed decision with their health care provider about screening for prostate cancer after they receive information about the uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. Prostate cancer screening should not occur without an informed decision-making process. Men at average risk should receive this information beginning at age 50 years. Men in higher risk groups should receive this information before age 50 years. Men should either receive this information directly from their health care providers or be referred to reliable and culturally appropriate sources. Patient decision aids are helpful in preparing men to make a decision whether to be tested. Copyright 2010 American Cancer Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20200110     DOI: 10.3322/caac.20066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  288 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening: Attitudes and practices of family physicians in Ontario.

Authors:  Christopher B Allard; Shawn Dason; Janis Lusis; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  An age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence among the oldest old, Utah 1973-2002.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Ken R Smith; Antoinette M Stroup; C Janna Harrell
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2014-11-14

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a promising tool for the diagnostics of human prostate cancer?

Authors:  Johannes Kurth; Elita Defeo; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Secretory phospholipase A2-IIa is a target gene of the HER/HER2-elicited pathway and a potential plasma biomarker for poor prognosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leslie Oleksowicz; Yin Liu; R Bruce Bracken; Krishnanath Gaitonde; Barbara Burke; Paul Succop; Linda Levin; Zhongyun Dong; Shan Lu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Guidelines for testosterone therapy for men: how to avoid a mad (t)ea party by getting personal.

Authors:  Bradley D Anawalt
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  Prostate biopsy for the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Hayet Amalou; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Pingkun Yan; Jochen Kruecker; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Comparative effectiveness of alternative prostate-specific antigen--based prostate cancer screening strategies: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; John L Gore; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Can 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect prostate cancer extracapsular extension?

Authors:  Yannick Cerantola; Massimo Valerio; Aida Kawkabani Marchini; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Patrice Jichlinski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Cancer disparities in people with HIV: A systematic review of screening for non-AIDS-defining malignancies.

Authors:  Kelsey L Corrigan; Kevin C Wall; John A Bartlett; Gita Suneja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Challenging the 10-year rule: The accuracy of patient life expectancy predictions by physicians in relation to prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Kevin M Y B Leung; Wilma M Hopman; Jun Kawakami
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.