Literature DB >> 19258472

Serum prostate-specific antigen hemodilution among obese men undergoing screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Robert L Grubb1, Amanda Black, Grant Izmirlian, Thomas P Hickey, Paul F Pinsky, Jerome E Mabie, Thomas L Riley, Lawrence R Ragard, Philip C Prorok, Christine D Berg, E David Crawford, Timothy R Church, Gerald L Andriole.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown an inverse relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration and body mass index (BMI). It has been recently proposed that this relationship may be explained by the larger plasma volume of obese men diluting a fixed amount of PSA (hemodilution effect). We examined this hypothesis in a cohort of men enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.
METHODS: Of 38,349 men ages 55 to 74 years randomized in PLCO to receive annual PSA and digital rectal examination screening, 28,380 had a baseline PSA, complete demographic information, and no prostate cancer diagnosis within 6 years from baseline. Self-reported height and weight were used to calculate BMI and to estimate plasma volume. PSA mass was estimated as PSA concentration times plasma volume. Multivariable linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship between PSA concentration, plasma volume, PSA mass, and BMI.
RESULTS: PSA concentration significantly decreased with increasing BMI (P<0.001); mean PSA values were 1.27, 1.25, 1.18, and 1.07 ng/mL among normal (BMI, 18.5-25), overweight (BMI, 25-30), obese (BMI, 30-35), and morbidly obese (BMI, >35) men, respectively. However, plasma volume also increased with increasing BMI and PSA mass showed no association with BMI, with mean values of 3.78, 3.95, 3.97, and 3.82 microg across the four BMI categories (P=0.10).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms earlier findings that the inverse relationship between PSA concentration and BMI may be explained by a hemodilution effect. These findings could have implications for prostate cancer screening in large men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258472     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  42 in total

Review 1.  Lifestyle and dietary factors in the prevention of lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn M Wilson; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  A novel equation and nomogram including body weight for estimating prostate volumes in men with biopsy-proven benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yasukazu Nakanishi; Hitoshi Masuda; Satoru Kawakami; Mizuaki Sakura; Yasuhisa Fujii; Kazutaka Saito; Fumitaka Koga; Masaya Ito; Junji Yonese; Iwao Fukui; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Prostate kallikrein markers in diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  David Ulmert; M Frank O'Brien; Anders S Bjartell; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  An inverse association of body mass index and prostate-specific antigen in northwest men of China: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jianqin Zhang; Binwu Sheng; Mao Ma; Xunyi Nan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

5.  Predictive value of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection is modified by obesity.

Authors:  D I Chu; C De Nunzio; L Gerber; J-A Thomas; E E Calloway; S Albisinni; C Senocak; M G McKeever; D M Moreira; A Tubaro; J W Moul; S J Freedland; L L Bañez
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 6.  Diabetes and cancer (2): evaluating the impact of diabetes on mortality in patients with cancer.

Authors:  A G Renehan; H-C Yeh; J A Johnson; S H Wild; E A M Gale; H Møller
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Body mass index as a classifier to predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with lower prostate-specific antigen levels.

Authors:  Keisuke Goto; Hirotaka Nagamatsu; Jun Teishima; Yuki Kohada; Shinsuke Fujii; Yoshimasa Kurimura; Koji Mita; Masanobu Shigeta; Satoshi Maruyama; Yoji Inoue; Mitsuru Nakahara; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-10

8.  The impact of obesity on the predictive accuracy of PSA in men undergoing prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Lionel L Bañez; Simone Albisinni; Stephen J Freedland; Andrea Tubaro; Cosimo De Nunzio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Body mass index and prostate cancer severity: do obese men harbor more aggressive disease on prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Karim Chamie; Stephanie Oberfoell; Lorna Kwan; Jessica Labo; John T Wei; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Has blood volume an impact on serum PSA levels?

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Christian Temml; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.