| Literature DB >> 31991914 |
Mi-Ju Kim1, Seung-Man Suh1, Sung-Yeon Kim1, Pei Qin1, Hong-Rae Kim1, Hae-Yeong Kim1.
Abstract
In this study, a donkey-specific primer pair and probe were designed from mitochondrial cytochrome b gene for the detection of raw donkey meat and different processed meat mixtures. The PCR product size for donkey DNA was 99 bp, and primer specificity was verified using 20 animal species. The limit of detection (LOD) was examined by serially diluting donkey DNA. Using real-time PCR, 0.001 ng of donkey DNA could be detected. In addition, binary meat mixtures with various percentages of donkey meat (0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, 1%, 10%, and 100%) in beef were analyzed to determine the sensitivity of this real-time PCR assay. At least 0.001% of donkey meat was detected in raw, boiled, roasted, dried, grinded, fried, and autoclaved meat mixtures. The developed real-time PCR method showed sufficient specificity and sensitivity in identification of donkey meat and could be a useful tool for the identification of donkey meat in processed products.Entities:
Keywords: cytochrome b; donkey; food adulteration; food fraud; meat products; real-time PCR
Year: 2020 PMID: 31991914 PMCID: PMC7074451 DOI: 10.3390/foods9020130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Sequences of primers and probes used in this study.
| Primer Name | Sequences (5′→3′) | Target Genes | Amplicon Size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Don3 F | CGCTCCATTCCCAACAAACTAGGTGGT |
| 99 | This study |
| Don3 R | GCTTCGTTGTTTTGACATGTGTAGGGTA | |||
| Don3 P | FAM-GCCCTTATCCTTTCCATCTTAATCC-TAMRA | |||
| 18SpEU-DIR | GGTAGTGACGAAAAATAACAATACAGGAC | 18S rRNA | 141 | [ |
| 18SpEU-INV | ATACGCTATTGGAGCTGGAATTACC | |||
| 18S probe | FAM-AAGTGGACTCATTCCAATTACAGGGCCT-TAMRA |
Specificity results using conventional and real-time PCR assays.
| Common Name | Scientific Name | Conventional PCR | Real-Time PCR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donkey-Specific PCR | Eukaryotic PCR | Donkey-Specific PCR | Eukaryotic PCR | ||
| Donkey |
| + | + | + | + |
| Horse |
| − | + | − | + |
| Beef |
| − | + | − | + |
| Lamb |
| − | + | − | + |
| Goat |
| − | + | − | + |
| Deer |
| − | + | − | + |
| Pork |
| − | + | − | + |
| Rabbit |
| − | + | − | + |
| Raccoon dog |
| − | + | − | + |
| Dog |
| − | + | − | + |
| Cat |
| − | + | − | + |
| Siberian chipmunk |
| − | + | − | + |
| Turkey |
| − | + | − | + |
| Ostrich |
| − | + | − | + |
| Chicken |
| − | + | − | + |
| Pheasant |
| − | + | − | + |
| Duck |
| − | + | − | + |
| Goose |
| − | + | − | + |
| Pigeon |
| − | + | − | + |
| Japanese quail |
| − | + | − | + |
Figure 1Amplification plot (A) and standard curve (B) for the detection of donkey DNA using 10-fold serial dilutions (from 10 to 0.001 ng).
Results of the developed real time-PCR method when applied to six meat mixtures processed following different technologies.
| Target Species | Ratio of Donkey Meat in the Binary Meat Mixture (%) | Ct Values | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | Boiled | Roasted | Dried | Grinded | Fried | Autoclaved | ||
|
| 100 | 18.45 ± 0.70 a | 20.24 ± 0.97 | 18.74 ± 0.06 | 18.59 ± 0.31 | 19.17 ± 0.60 | 21.17 ± 0.55 | 20.86 ± 0.26 |
| 10 | 21.55 ± 0.52 | 23.34 ± 0.64 | 21.79 ± 0.08 | 21.27 ± 0.25 | 22.30 ± 0.57 | 24.01 ± 0.33 | 23.86 ± 0.21 | |
| 1 | 24.58 ± 0.47 | 26.4 ± 0.63 | 24.97 ± 0.0.8 | 24.35 ± 0.43 | 25.71 ± 0.10 | 27.31 ± 0.42 | 26.68 ± 0.30 | |
| 0.1 | 27.37 ± 1.03 | 29.15 ± 1.06 | 28.19 ± 0.07 | 27.47 ± 0.43 | 28.84 ± 0.10 | 30.61 ± 0.38 | 29.53 ± 0.19 | |
| 0.01 | 30.48 ± 1.03 | 32.11 ± 1.20 | 31.32 ± 0.05 | 30.63 ± 0.56 | 31.83 ± 0.43 | 33.71 ± 0.27 | 32.67 ± 0.08 | |
| 0.001 | 33.59 ± 1.08 | 34.89 ± 0.96 | 34.35 ± 0.07 | 33.57 ± 0.51 | 34.13 ± 0.51 | 36.72 ± 0.33 | 35.69 ± 0.17 | |
a Average Ct value ± standard deviation obtained from triplicate reactions.