Jill Johnston1, Lara Cushing2. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. jillj@usc.edu. 2. Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Polluting industries are more likely to be located in low-income communities of color who also experience greater social stressors that may make them more vulnerable than others to the health impacts of toxic chemical exposures. We describe recent developments in assessing pollutant exposures and health threats posed by industrial facilities using or releasing synthetic chemicals to nearby communities in the U.S. RECENT FINDINGS: More people are living near oil and gas development due to the expansion of unconventional extraction techniques as well as near industrial animal operations, both with suggestive evidence of increased exposure to hazardous pollutants and adverse health effects. Legacy contamination continues to adversely impact a new generation of residents in fenceline communities, with recent studies documenting exposures to toxic metals and poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Researchers are also giving consideration to acute exposures resulting from inadvertent industrial chemical releases, including those resulting from extreme weather events linked to climate change. Natural experiments of industrial closures or cleanups provide compelling evidence that exposures from industry harm the health of nearby residents. New and legacy industries, coupled with climate change, present unique health risks to communities living near industry due to the release of toxic chemicals. Cumulative impacts from multiple stressors faced by environmental justice communities may amplify these adverse effects.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Polluting industries are more likely to be located in low-income communities of color who also experience greater social stressors that may make them more vulnerable than others to the health impacts of toxic chemical exposures. We describe recent developments in assessing pollutant exposures and health threats posed by industrial facilities using or releasing synthetic chemicals to nearby communities in the U.S. RECENT FINDINGS: More people are living near oil and gas development due to the expansion of unconventional extraction techniques as well as near industrial animal operations, both with suggestive evidence of increased exposure to hazardous pollutants and adverse health effects. Legacy contamination continues to adversely impact a new generation of residents in fenceline communities, with recent studies documenting exposures to toxic metals and poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Researchers are also giving consideration to acute exposures resulting from inadvertent industrial chemical releases, including those resulting from extreme weather events linked to climate change. Natural experiments of industrial closures or cleanups provide compelling evidence that exposures from industry harm the health of nearby residents. New and legacy industries, coupled with climate change, present unique health risks to communities living near industry due to the release of toxic chemicals. Cumulative impacts from multiple stressors faced by environmental justice communities may amplify these adverse effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
Climate justice; Environmental justice; Industrial pollution; Natural technological disasters; Oil and gas development
Authors: Rachel Rogers Worley; Susan McAfee Moore; Bruce C Tierney; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Sean Campbell; Million B Woudneh; Jeffrey Fisher Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Elise G Elliott; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Lisa A McKay; Courtney J Pedersen; Chang Wang; Christopher J Gerber; Thomas J Wright; Andrew J Sumner; Mairead Brennan; Genevieve S Silva; Joshua L Warren; Desiree L Plata; Nicole C Deziel Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Erin N Haynes; Heidi Sucharew; Timothy J Hilbert; Pierce Kuhnell; Alonzo Spencer; Nicholas C Newman; Roxanne Burns; Robert Wright; Patrick J Parsons; Kim N Dietrich Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Leticia Nogueira; Kristi E White; Brooke Bell; Katie E Alegria; Gary Bennett; Donald Edmondson; Elissa Epel; E Alison Holman; Ian M Kronish; Julian Thayer Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Linda C Giudice; Erlidia F Llamas-Clark; Nathaniel DeNicola; Santosh Pandipati; Marya G Zlatnik; Ditas Cristina D Decena; Tracey J Woodruff; Jeanne A Conry Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 4.447
Authors: Suzanne L Ishaq; Francisco J Parada; Patricia G Wolf; Carla Y Bonilla; Megan A Carney; Amber Benezra; Emily Wissel; Michael Friedman; Kristen M DeAngelis; Jake M Robinson; Ashkaan K Fahimipour; Melissa B Manus; Laura Grieneisen; Leslie G Dietz; Ashish Pathak; Ashvini Chauhan; Sahana Kuthyar; Justin D Stewart; Mauna R Dasari; Emily Nonnamaker; Mallory Choudoir; Patrick F Horve; Naupaka B Zimmerman; Ariangela J Kozik; Katherine Weatherford Darling; Adriana L Romero-Olivares; Janani Hariharan; Nicole Farmer; Katherine A Maki; Jackie L Collier; Kieran C O'Doherty; Jeffrey Letourneau; Jeff Kline; Peter L Moses; Nicolae Morar Journal: mSystems Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 6.496