Literature DB >> 31970699

Stakeholder Perspectives on Colonoscopy Navigation and Colorectal Cancer Screening Inequities.

Deeonna E Farr1, Venice E Haynes2, Cheryl A Armstead3, Heather M Brandt2.   

Abstract

Black adults complete colonoscopies at lower rates than other groups despite increased colorectal cancer risk. Patient navigation represents a strategy to address the varied factors that influence colonoscopy completion, but few reports describe how navigation reduces racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening rates. The purpose of this study was to understand how a statewide colonoscopy navigation program addressed the challenges faced by low-income Black adults attempting to complete screening colonoscopy. A qualitative case study analysis was conducted at a participating clinical site of a statewide colonoscopy navigation program. Clinical observations, document reviews, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients, patient navigators, and clinical staff. Patient participants were recruited to ensure maximum variation related to gender and colonoscopy completion. Thematic coding allowed researchers to examine experiences, perceptions, and emotions related to patient navigation. In total, 31 interviews were completed between October 2014 and February 2015. Patients and patient navigators reported logistical, psychosocial, and knowledge-related barriers to colonoscopy completion. Clinical staff reports focused mostly on logistical barriers. Benefits of patient navigation also varied by participant type with clinical staff revealing positive effects on the clinic's relationships with referring specialty practices. Patient navigators address barriers that are important to patients, but often unseen by clinical staff/providers. New information about the benefits different stakeholders derive from this strategy was revealed. Together these findings provide insight into the processes associated with this strategy and novel information about the appeal of patient navigation to various stakeholders.
© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African Americans; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Early detection of cancer; Patient navigation

Year:  2021        PMID: 31970699     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01684-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  11 in total

1.  Racial disparities in outcomes of colorectal cancer screening: biology or barriers to optimal care?

Authors:  John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: the glass is half full.

Authors:  Alfred I Neugut; Benjamin Lebwohl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Barriers and facilitators to adherence to screening colonoscopy among African-Americans: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Carrie R Wong; Elana R Bloomfield; Danielle M Crookes; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Evaluation of a patient navigation program to promote colorectal cancer screening in rural Georgia, USA.

Authors:  Sally Honeycutt; Rhonda Green; Denise Ballard; April Hermstad; Alex Brueder; Regine Haardörfer; Jennifer Yam; Kimberly J Arriola
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the field.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan; Jennifer E Boehm; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Judith Preissle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Implementation of culturally targeted patient navigation system for screening colonoscopy in a direct referral system.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Julia L Cooperman; Lauren M Stossel; Steven Itzkowitz; Hayley S Thompson; Cristina Villagra; Linda D Thélémaque; Thomas McGinn; Gary Winkel; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel C Shelton; William Redd
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-02-07

8.  A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Annie Thibault; Renay Caldwell; Michele J Josey; Beidi Qiang; Edsel Peña; Delecia LaFrance; Franklin G Berger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Arica White; Trevor D Thompson; Mary C White; Susan A Sabatino; Janet de Moor; Paul V Doria-Rose; Ann M Geiger; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 10.  Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keith Naylor; James Ward; Blase N Polite
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  1 in total

1.  Engaging the Community on Colorectal Cancer Screening Education: Focus Group Discussions Among African Americans.

Authors:  John S Luque; Matthew Vargas; Kristin Wallace; Olayemi O Matthew; Rima Tawk; Askal A Ali; Gebre-Egziabher Kiros; Cynthia M Harris; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 1.771

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.