Literature DB >> 23719894

Evaluation of a patient navigation program to promote colorectal cancer screening in rural Georgia, USA.

Sally Honeycutt1, Rhonda Green, Denise Ballard, April Hermstad, Alex Brueder, Regine Haardörfer, Jennifer Yam, Kimberly J Arriola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Early detection through recommended screening has been shown to have favorable treatment outcomes, yet screening rates among the medically underserved and uninsured are low, particularly for rural and minority populations. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a patient navigation program that addresses individual and systemic barriers to CRC screening for patients at rural, federally qualified community health centers.
METHODS: This quasi-experimental evaluation compared low-income patients at average risk for CRC (n = 809) from 4 intervention clinics and 9 comparison clinics. We abstracted medical chart data on patient demographics, CRC history and risk factors, and CRC screening referrals and examinations. Outcomes of interest were colonoscopy referral and examination during the study period and being compliant with recommended screening guidelines at the end of the study period. We conducted multilevel logistic analyses to evaluate the program's effectiveness.
RESULTS: Patients at intervention clinics were significantly more likely than patients at comparison clinics to undergo colonoscopy screening (35% versus 7%, odds ratio = 7.9, P < .01) and be guideline-compliant on at least one CRC screening test (43% versus 11%, odds ratio = 5.9, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient navigation, delivered through the Community Cancer Screening Program, can be an effective approach to ensure that lifesaving, preventive health screenings are provided to low-income adults in a rural setting.
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; community health centers; community health workers; program evaluation; rural health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23719894     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  33 in total

1.  Regional variation in colorectal cancer testing and geographic availability of care in a publicly insured population.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Ravi K Goyal; Anne-Marie Meyer; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Emily M Gillen; Seth Tyree; Carmen L Lewis; Trisha M Crutchfield; Christa E Martens; Florence Tangka; Lisa C Richardson; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Patient Navigation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Cam Escoffery; Maria E Fernandez; Sally W Vernon; Shuting Liang; Annette E Maxwell; Jennifer D Allen; Andrea Dwyer; Peggy A Hannon; Marlana Kohn; Amy DeGroff
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  The Role of Patient Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Education: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ajeesh Sunny; Luis Rustveld
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Refining the Patient Navigation Role in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Results From an Intervention Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan; Beth Slotman; Amy DeGroff; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Jennifer Murillo; Paul Schroy
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Increase Cancer Screening in Populations Adversely Affected by Health Disparities: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Amy Cantor; Jesse Wagner; Rebecca Jungbauer; Rongwei Fu; Karli Kondo; Lucy Stillman; Ana Quiñones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Increasing colonoscopy screening in disparate populations: Results from an evaluation of patient navigation in the New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Ketra Rice; Lindsay Gressard; Amy DeGroff; Joanne Gersten; Janene Robie; Steven Leadbetter; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Lynn Butterly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Training in Patient Navigation: A Review of the Research Literature.

Authors:  Amy E Ustjanauskas; Marissa Bredice; Sumayah Nuhaily; Lisa Kath; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-12-08

8.  The effect of socioeconomic status, race, and insurance type on newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the United States (2004-2013).

Authors:  Adam B Weiner; Richard S Matulewicz; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Joseph M Feinglass; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Colonoscopy Navigation and Colorectal Cancer Screening Inequities.

Authors:  Deeonna E Farr; Venice E Haynes; Cheryl A Armstead; Heather M Brandt
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Eric S Johnson; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David Smith; Raj Mummadi; Amanda F Petrik; Jamie H Thompson; Ricardo Jimenez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.