Jan M Eberth1,2,3,4, Annie Thibault4, Renay Caldwell4, Michele J Josey1, Beidi Qiang5,6, Edsel Peña5, Delecia LaFrance7, Franklin G Berger4,8. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. 2. Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. 3. South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. 4. Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. 5. Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. 6. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Illinois. 7. EviCore Healthcare, Melbourne, Florida. 8. Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer screening rates are lowest in those without insurance or a regular provider. Since 2008, the Colorectal Cancer Prevention Network (CCPN) has provided open access colonoscopy to uninsured residents of South Carolina through established, statewide partnerships and patient navigation. Herein, we describe the structure, implementation, and clinical outcomes of this program. METHODS: The CCPN provides access to colonoscopy screening at no cost to uninsured, asymptomatic patients aged 50-64 years (African Americans age 45-64 years are eligible) who live at or below 150% of the poverty line and seek medical care in free medical clinics, federally qualified health centers, or hospital-based indigent practices in South Carolina. Screening is performed by board-certified gastroenterologists. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis are used to describe the population screened, and to assess compliance rates and colonoscopy quality metrics. RESULTS: Out of >4000 patients referred to the program, 1854 were deemed eligible, 1144 attended an in-person navigation visit, and 1030 completed a colonoscopy; 909 were included in the final sample. Nearly 90% of participants exhibited good-to-excellent bowel preparation. An overall cecal intubation rate of 99% was measured. The polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate were 63% and 36%, respectively, with male sex and urban residence positively associated with adenoma detection. Over 13% of participants had an advanced polyp, and 1% had a cancer diagnosis or surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The CCPN program is characterized by strong collaboration with clinicians statewide, low no-show rates, and high colonoscopy quality. Future work will assess the effectiveness of the navigation approach and will explore the mechanisms driving higher adenoma detection in urban participants. Cancer 2018;124:1912-20.
BACKGROUND:Cancer screening rates are lowest in those without insurance or a regular provider. Since 2008, the Colorectal Cancer Prevention Network (CCPN) has provided open access colonoscopy to uninsured residents of South Carolina through established, statewide partnerships and patient navigation. Herein, we describe the structure, implementation, and clinical outcomes of this program. METHODS: The CCPN provides access to colonoscopy screening at no cost to uninsured, asymptomatic patients aged 50-64 years (African Americans age 45-64 years are eligible) who live at or below 150% of the poverty line and seek medical care in free medical clinics, federally qualified health centers, or hospital-based indigent practices in South Carolina. Screening is performed by board-certified gastroenterologists. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis are used to describe the population screened, and to assess compliance rates and colonoscopy quality metrics. RESULTS: Out of >4000 patients referred to the program, 1854 were deemed eligible, 1144 attended an in-person navigation visit, and 1030 completed a colonoscopy; 909 were included in the final sample. Nearly 90% of participants exhibited good-to-excellent bowel preparation. An overall cecal intubation rate of 99% was measured. The polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate were 63% and 36%, respectively, with male sex and urban residence positively associated with adenoma detection. Over 13% of participants had an advanced polyp, and 1% had a cancer diagnosis or surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The CCPN program is characterized by strong collaboration with clinicians statewide, low no-show rates, and high colonoscopy quality. Future work will assess the effectiveness of the navigation approach and will explore the mechanisms driving higher adenoma detection in urban participants. Cancer 2018;124:1912-20.
Authors: Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Sandra Lisboa; A Naomie Casimir; Lisa Valley-Shah; Karen M Emmons; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-05-23
Authors: Holly J Wolf; Andrea Dwyer; Dennis J Ahnen; Shannon L Pray; Susan M Rein; Krystal D Morwood; Jan T Lowery; Andrea Masias; Nicole J Collins; Carol E Brown; Carol-Ann DeMaio Goheen; Keavy E McAbee; Angela Sauaia; Tim E Byers Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jae Hyun Kim; Youn Jung Choi; Hye Jung Kwon; Seun Ja Park; Moo In Park; Won Moon; Sung Eun Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Sundus Haji-Jama; Emma Bartfay; Isaac N Luginaah; Frances C Wright; Sindu M Kanjeekal Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-03-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jennifer M Kolb; Junxiao Hu; Kristen DeSanto; Dexiang Gao; Siddharth Singh; Thomas Imperiale; David A Lieberman; C Richard Boland; Swati G Patel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 33.883
Authors: Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Jennifer S Lin; Kathryn E Bouskill Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Charles R Rogers; Phung Matthews; Lei Xu; Kenneth Boucher; Colin Riley; Matthew Huntington; Nathan Le Duc; Kola S Okuyemi; Margaret J Foster Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.240