Literature DB >> 23868482

Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the field.

Elizabeth A Rohan1, Jennifer E Boehm, Amy DeGroff, Rebecca Glover-Kudon, Judith Preissle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer, as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men and women in the United States, represents an important area for public health intervention. Although colorectal cancer screening can prevent cancer and detect disease early when treatment is most effective, few organized public health screening programs have been implemented and evaluated. From 2005 to 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded 5 sites to participate in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP), which was designed to reach medically underserved populations.
METHODS: The authors conducted a longitudinal, multiple case study to analyze program implementation processes. Qualitative methods included interviews with 100 stakeholders, 125 observations, and review of 19 documents. Data were analyzed within and across cases.
RESULTS: Several themes related to CRCSDP implementation emerged from the cross-case analysis: the complexity of colorectal cancer screening, the need for teamwork and collaboration, integration of the program into existing systems, the ability of programs to use wisdom at the local level, and the influence of social norms. Although these themes were explored independently from 1 another, interaction across themes was evident.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening is clinically complex, and its screening methods are not well accepted by the general public; both of these circumstances have implications for program implementation. Using patient navigation, engaging in transdisciplinary teamwork, assimilating new programs into existing clinical settings, and deferring to local-level wisdom together helped to address complexity and enhance program implementation. In addition, public health efforts must confront negative social norms around colorectal cancer screening.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening tests; collaboration; colorectal cancer screening; early detection of cancer; interdisciplinary communication; program evaluation; program implementation; qualitative evaluation; taboo

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868482      PMCID: PMC5389376          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  44 in total

Review 1.  The future of research that promotes cancer screening.

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Sally W Vernon; Barbara K Rimer; Katherine M Wilson; William Rakowski; Peter A Briss; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The importance of transdisciplinary collaborations for understanding and resolving health disparities.

Authors:  Sarah Gehlert; Ann Murray; Dana Sohmer; Martha McClintock; Suzanne Conzen; Olufunmilayo Olopade
Journal:  Soc Work Public Health       Date:  2010-05

3.  Climbing Everest: oncology work as an expedition in caring.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rohan; Jane Bausch
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Toward transdisciplinary research: historical and contemporary perspectives.

Authors:  Frank Kessel; Patricia L Rosenfield
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Sandra Lisboa; A Naomie Casimir; Lisa Valley-Shah; Karen M Emmons; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

6.  Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention.

Authors:  C Beeker; J M Kraft; B G Southwell; C M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

7.  Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann C DeBourcy; Scott Lichtenberger; Susanne Felton; Kiel T Butterfield; Dennis J Ahnen; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Costs of planning and implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Maggie C Beebe; Amy DeGroff; Janet Royalty; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jason M Satterfield; Bonnie Spring; Ross C Brownson; Edward J Mullen; Robin P Newhouse; Barbara B Walker; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Start-up of the colorectal cancer screening demonstration program.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Debra Holden; Sonya Goode Green; Jennifer Boehm; Laura C Seeff; Florence Tangka
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  14 in total

1.  Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention (PROMPT): Study protocol for a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Jamie H Thompson; Melinda M Davis; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David H Smith; Amanda F Petrik; Melissa Castillo; Brittany Younger; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Fecal-based colorectal cancer screening among the uninsured in northern Manhattan.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Karen M Schmitt; Daniel E Freedberg; Rachel A Kramer; Yin Su; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Increasing colonoscopy screening in disparate populations: Results from an evaluation of patient navigation in the New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Ketra Rice; Lindsay Gressard; Amy DeGroff; Joanne Gersten; Janene Robie; Steven Leadbetter; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Lynn Butterly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Recruiting patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: strategies and challenges across 5 sites.

Authors:  Jennifer E Boehm; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Amy DeGroff; Rebecca Glover-Kudon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Developmental milestones across the programmatic life cycle: implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Amy DeGroff; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Jennifer E Boehm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Colonoscopy Navigation and Colorectal Cancer Screening Inequities.

Authors:  Deeonna E Farr; Venice E Haynes; Cheryl A Armstead; Heather M Brandt
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Implementation challenges and successes of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Adrianne C Feldstein; David M Mosen; Nancy Perrin; Ana Gabriela Rosales; David H Smith
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Assessment of training and technical assistance needs of Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees in the U.S.

Authors:  Cam Escoffery; Peggy Hannon; Annette E Maxwell; Thuy Vu; Jennifer Leeman; Andrea Dwyer; Caitlin Mason; Shaina Sowles; Ketra Rice; Lindsay Gressard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Patient Navigation for Colonoscopy Completion: Results of an RCT.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Paul C Schroy; Kerry Grace Morrissey; Beth Slotman; Elizabeth A Rohan; James Bethel; Jennifer Murillo; Weijia Ren; Shelley Niwa; Steven Leadbetter; Djenaba Joseph
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  Framework and Strategies to Eliminate Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Kevin Selby; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 13.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.