PURPOSE: X-linked retinitis pigmentosa can manifest in female carriers with widely variable severity, whereas others remain unaffected. The contribution of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) to phenotypic variation has been postulated but not demonstrated. Furthermore, the impact of genotype and genetic modifiers has been demonstrated in affected males but has not been well established in female carriers. The purpose of this study was to describe the scope of clinical phenotype in female carriers with mutations in RPGR and quantify the contribution of genotype, genetic modifiers, and XCI to phenotypic severity. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-seven female carriers with RPGR mutations from 41 pedigrees. METHODS: Coding single nucleotide polymorphisms were sequenced in candidate genetic modifier genes encoding known RPGR-interacting proteins. X-chromosome inactivation ratios were determined in genomic DNA isolated from blood (n = 42) and saliva (n = 20) using methylation status of X-linked polymorphic repeats. These genetic data were compared with disease severity based on quantitative clinical parameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, Humphrey visual field (HVF) results, full-field electroretinography results, and dark adaptation. RESULTS: Most individuals at all ages were mildly affected or unaffected, whereas those who progressed to moderate or severe vision loss were older than 30 years. RPGR genotype was not associated with clinical severity. The D1264N variant in RPGRIP1L was associated with more severe disease. Skewed XCI toward inactivation of the normal RPGR allele was associated with more severe disease. The XCI ratio in both blood and saliva was a predictor of visual function as measured by HVF diameter, rod amplitude, flicker amplitude, and flicker implicit time. For carriers with extreme XCI skewing of 80:20 or more, 57% were affected severely compared with 8% for those with XCI of less than 80:20 (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Female carriers with mutations in RPGR demonstrate widely variable clinical severity. X-chromosome inactivation ratios correlate with clinical severity and may serve as a predictor of clinically significant disease. Because RPGR gene therapy trials are underway, a future imperative exists to determine which carriers require intervention and when to intervene. X-chromosome inactivation analysis may be useful for identifying candidates for early intervention.
PURPOSE:X-linked retinitis pigmentosa can manifest in female carriers with widely variable severity, whereas others remain unaffected. The contribution of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) to phenotypic variation has been postulated but not demonstrated. Furthermore, the impact of genotype and genetic modifiers has been demonstrated in affected males but has not been well established in female carriers. The purpose of this study was to describe the scope of clinical phenotype in female carriers with mutations in RPGR and quantify the contribution of genotype, genetic modifiers, and XCI to phenotypic severity. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-seven female carriers with RPGR mutations from 41 pedigrees. METHODS: Coding single nucleotide polymorphisms were sequenced in candidate genetic modifier genes encoding known RPGR-interacting proteins. X-chromosome inactivation ratios were determined in genomic DNA isolated from blood (n = 42) and saliva (n = 20) using methylation status of X-linked polymorphic repeats. These genetic data were compared with disease severity based on quantitative clinical parameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, Humphrey visual field (HVF) results, full-field electroretinography results, and dark adaptation. RESULTS: Most individuals at all ages were mildly affected or unaffected, whereas those who progressed to moderate or severe vision loss were older than 30 years. RPGR genotype was not associated with clinical severity. The D1264N variant in RPGRIP1L was associated with more severe disease. Skewed XCI toward inactivation of the normal RPGR allele was associated with more severe disease. The XCI ratio in both blood and saliva was a predictor of visual function as measured by HVF diameter, rod amplitude, flicker amplitude, and flicker implicit time. For carriers with extreme XCI skewing of 80:20 or more, 57% were affected severely compared with 8% for those with XCI of less than 80:20 (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Female carriers with mutations in RPGR demonstrate widely variable clinical severity. X-chromosome inactivation ratios correlate with clinical severity and may serve as a predictor of clinically significant disease. Because RPGR gene therapy trials are underway, a future imperative exists to determine which carriers require intervention and when to intervene. X-chromosome inactivation analysis may be useful for identifying candidates for early intervention.
Authors: John H Kempen; Paul Mitchell; Kristine E Lee; James M Tielsch; Aimee T Broman; Hugh R Taylor; M Kamran Ikram; Nathan G Congdon; Benita J O'Colmain Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Neil D Ebenezer; Michel Michaelides; Sharon A Jenkins; Isabelle Audo; Andrew R Webster; Michael E Cheetham; Andrew Stockman; Eamonn R Maher; John R Ainsworth; John R Yates; Keith Bradshaw; Graham E Holder; Anthony T Moore; Alison J Hardcastle Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: William A Beltran; Artur V Cideciyan; Alfred S Lewin; William W Hauswirth; Samuel G Jacobson; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: F Yesim K Demirci; Brian W Rigatti; Gaiping Wen; Amy L Radak; Tammy S Mah; Corrine L Baic; Elias I Traboulsi; Tiina Alitalo; Juliane Ramser; Michael B Gorin Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-02-20 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Mays Talib; Mary J van Schooneveld; Caroline Van Cauwenbergh; Jan Wijnholds; Jacoline B Ten Brink; Ralph J Florijn; Nicoline E Schalij-Delfos; Gislin Dagnelie; Maria M van Genderen; Elfride De Baere; Magda A Meester-Smoor; Julie De Zaeytijd; Frans P M Cremers; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Alberta A Thiadens; Carel B Hoyng; Caroline C Klaver; Bart P Leroy; Arthur A Bergen; Camiel J F Boon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alexis-Pierre Bemelmans; Corinne Kostic; Sylvain V Crippa; William W Hauswirth; Janis Lem; Francis L Munier; Mathias W Seeliger; Andreas Wenzel; Yvan Arsenijevic Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Vlasta Hadalin; Maja Šuštar; Marija Volk; Aleš Maver; Jana Sajovic; Martina Jarc-Vidmar; Borut Peterlin; Marko Hawlina; Ana Fakin Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Beau J Fenner; Tien-En Tan; Amutha Veluchamy Barathi; Sai Bo Bo Tun; Sia Wey Yeo; Andrew S H Tsai; Shu Yen Lee; Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung; Choi Mun Chan; Jodhbir S Mehta; Kelvin Y C Teo Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 4.599