| Literature DB >> 27995965 |
Francesco Parmeggiani1, Vanessa Barbaro2, Katia De Nadai1,3, Enrico Lavezzo4, Stefano Toppo4, Marzio Chizzolini3, Giorgio Palù4, Cristina Parolin4, Enzo Di Iorio4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe a new pathogenic variant in the mutational hot spot exon ORF15 of retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene within an Italian family with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (RP), detailing its distinctive genotype-phenotype correlation with pathologic myopia (PM). All members of this RP-PM family underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. The entire open reading frames of RPGR and retinitis pigmentosa 2 genes were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. A novel frame-shift mutation in exon ORF15 of RPGR gene (c.2091_2092insA; p.A697fs) was identified as hemizygous variant in the male proband with RP, and as heterozygous variant in the females of this pedigree who invariably exhibited symmetrical PM in both eyes. The c.2091_2092insA mutation coherently co-segregated with the observed phenotypes. These findings expand the spectrum of X-linked RP variants. Interestingly, focusing on Caucasian ethnicity, just three RPGR mutations are hitherto reported in RP-PM families: one of these is located in exon ORF15, but none appears to be characterized by a high penetrance of PM trait as observed in the present, relatively small, pedigree. The geno-phenotypic attributes of this heterozygosity suggest that gain-of-function mechanism could give rise to PM via a degenerative cell-cell remodeling of the retinal structures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27995965 PMCID: PMC5171904 DOI: 10.1038/srep39179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Pedigree of a non-consanguineous family with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and pathologic myopia (PM), retinal imaging, and novel frame-shift mutation identified in exon ORF15 of RPGR gene.
(A) Pedigree of the RP-PM family. Black squares (males) represent individuals affected by RP. Dotted circles (females) represent individuals affected by PM. Unaffected individuals are not shaded. Black lines indicate deceased individuals. Each generation is identified by a Roman numeral on the left (from I to IV), and each individual within the generation is identified by Arabic numerals next to the symbols. The arrow marks the proband. (B,C) Color fundus photographs of the posterior pole of the proband III:3 bilaterally show the typical aspect of RP, characterized by optic disc pallor, attenuated retinal vessels, macular dystrophy, and degenerative changes of the retinal pigment epithelium with an irregular visualization of the peri-papillary choroidal vasculature. (D,E) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographies of the macula of the proband III:3 document the degenerative changes of retinal layers in both eyes, revealing the structural damages of both inner segment ellipsoid band and photoreceptor outer segment. (F,G) Color fundus photographs of the posterior pole of the obligate carrier II:2 bilaterally exhibit the features of severe PM, characterized by titling of the optic disc with an extensive peri-papillary atrophic crescent, straightened and stretched retinal vessels, patchy chorioretinal areas of macular atrophy and dystrophy, and diffuse degenerative changes of the retinal pigment epithelium with a marked visualization of the choroidal vasculature. (H,I) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographies of the obligate carrier II:2 confirm the phenotypic signs of PM-related macular degeneration in both eyes, typically evidencing a myopic staphylomatous configuration of the posterior pole. (J–L) Representative sequence chromatograms of the hemizygous male proband III-3, heterozygous obligate female carrier II-2, and unaffected proband’s maternal male cousin III-4 are illustrated.
Summary of clinical and genotypic findings (Family RPGR-ORF15 c.2091_2092insA; p.A697fs).
| ID/Sex/Age (Y) | Refraction (ESD) OD/OS | BCVA (SE) OD/OS | LOCS III Grading (NO/NC/C/P) OU | IOP (mmHg) OD/OS | Axial Length (mm) OD/OS | Visual Field MD (decibel) OD/OS | ff-ERG Amplitude (μVolts) OD/OS | Genotype/Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II:1/M/58 | −0.50/−0.25 | 20/20/20/20 | 0/0/0/0 | 16/16 | 24.12/24.26 | −0.55/−0.39 | 242.3/244.8 | normal/normal |
| II:2/F/54 | −14.00/−16.75 | 20/32/20/40 | 1/1/0/1 | 15/16 | 31.28/32.79 | −15.56/−19.04 | 121.4/124.3 | HET-FSM/PM |
| II:3/M/52 | +1.50/+1.75 | 20/20/20/20 | 0/0/0/0 | 18/17 | 23.84/23.88 | −0.62/−0.71 | 249.9/246.8 | normal/normal |
| II:4/F/50 | −13.50/−15.00 | 20/32/20/32 | 1/1/0/1 | 17/17 | 30.23/31.51 | −16.03/−18.86 | 135.7/137.9 | HET-FSM/PM |
| II:5/M/55 | −1.75/−1.50 | 20/20/20/20 | 0/0/0/0 | 16/16 | 24.94/24.89 | −0.46/−0.37 | 239.6/238.1 | normal/normal |
| III:1/M/35 | +0.25/+0.25 | 20/20/20/20 | 0/0/0/0 | 18/18 | 24.03/23.92 | −0.14/−0.09 | 251.7/247.3 | normal/normal |
| III:2/F/34 | −12.75/−14.25 | 20/25/20/32 | 0/0/0/0 | 16/15 | 30.04/31.12 | −20.89/−21.71 | 129.9/128.2 | HET-FSM/PM |
| III:3/M/31 (*) | −5.50/−5.25 | 20/63/20/63 | 0/0/0/1 | 14/14 | 25.78/25.75 | −29.54/−31.00 | 19.2/21.3 | HEM-FSM/RP |
| III:4/M/27 | −2.50/−2.00 | 20/20/20/20 | 0/0/0/0 | 18/18 | 24.33/24.35 | −0.39/−0.31 | 251.7/249.2 | normal/normal |
| III:5/F/25 | −13.25/−12.50 | 20/25/20/25 | 0/0/0/0 | 17/17 | 30.12/29.74 | −15.09/−14.94 | 141.9/145.3 | HET-FSM/PM |
| IV:1/M/8 | +1.50/+1.75 | 20/20/20/20 | 0/0/0/0 | 18/18 | 23.17/23.12 | −0.08/−0.15 | 255.3/258.2 | normal/normal |
ID, Identification code of patients; Y, Years; M, Male; F, Female; (*), proband; ESD, Equivalent Spherical Diopters; OD, Oculus Dexter; OS, Oculus Sinister; BCVA, Best Corrected Visual Acuity; SE, Snellen Equivalent; LOCS III, Lens Opacities Classification System III; NO, Nuclear Opalescence; NC, Nuclear Color; C, Cortical cataract; P, Posterior subcapsular cataract; OU, Oculi Uterque; IOP, Intraocular Pressure; MD, Mean Deviation; ff-ERG, full-field Electroretinography; HET, Heterozygosis; FSM, Frame-Shift Mutation; HEM, Hemizygosis; PM, Pathologic Myopia; RP, Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Figure 2Structural comparison between wild type and mutant RPGR protein and intrinsic protein disorder prediction.
(A) Wild type (left) and mutant (right) RPGR protein models are shown: while the N-terminal RCC1-like domain is conserved (highlighted by yellow boxes), the frame-shift mutation induces the loss of a long C-terminal domain highly rich of glutamic acid residues (dotted box), resulting in a much shorter protein. (B) The intrinsic disorder profile shows how the conserved N-terminal domain is extremely ordered (yellow boxes) in contrast with the remaining portion that does not possess an intrinsic structure. Seven spikes corresponding to connecting loops of the seven blade-shaped beta sheets of the beta-propeller structure are visible in the profile. Please note that the X-axis scale is different because of the length of the proteins.