| Literature DB >> 31952306 |
Daniela Bacherini1,2, Maria Cristina Savastano3, Francesco Dragotto1, Lucia Finocchio1, Chiara Lenzetti1, Alice Bitossi1, Ruggero Tartaro1, Fabrizio Giansanti1, Francesco Barca1, Alfonso Savastano1, Tomaso Caporossi1, Lorenzo Vannozzi1, Andrea Sodi1, Marino De Luca2, Francesco Faraldi4, Gianni Virgili1, Stanislao Rizzo1.
Abstract
(1) Objective: To use optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and microperimetry (MP) to evaluate the correlation between retinal structure and function in patients with idiopathic, full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) (2)Entities:
Keywords: OCT Angiography; full-thickness macular hole; microperimetry
Year: 2020 PMID: 31952306 PMCID: PMC7019327 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1An eye with full thickness macular hole analyzed using en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) (A) and OCT angiography (B). In the lower part the corresponding segmentation is visible.
Figure 2The ETDRS-based vessel density [%], with division of the macular area into the nine ETDRS subfields (on the left). On the right, a scheme showing the rings centered around the fovea. The fovea is defined as the area within the central 1-mm ring of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid. The surrounding ring with an inner diameter of 1 mm and an outer diameter of 3 mm is considered as the inner ring. The ring with an inner diameter of 3 mm and an outer diameter of 6 mm is considered as the outer ring. The whole ring includes the fovea and the inner and outer rings.
Figure 3(A) The B-scan OCT shows a full-thickness macular hole. (B) The central absolute scotoma corresponding to the FTMH and rings of relative scotoma extending in the perilesional area are shown in microperimetry map. These relative scotomas correlate with the cystic alterations detected by OCT angiography at the level of deep capillary plexus (B) and by en face OCT in the outer plexiform layer (OPL) and the Henle fiber layer (HFL) complex (C).
Figure 4(A) 1. En face scan of the OPL + HFL complex of a large MH. 2. The extension of cystic cavities measured on the slab corresponding to OPL + HFL complex assessed by OCT en face, using the Image J software. In the lower part the corresponding cavity area in mm2 and the Best Corrected visual Acuity in LogMAR are indicated. 3. Overlay of the microperimetry (2° retinal sensitivity) on the slabs corresponding to the deep capillary plexus on OCTA. (B) 1. En face OCT (OPL + HFL complex) of a smaller macular hole. 2. The extension of cystic cavities measured on the slab corresponding to OPL + HFL complex assessed by OCT en face, using Image J software. 3. Overlay of the microperimetry (2° retinal sensitivity) on the slabs corresponding to the deep capillary plexus on OCTA.
Figure 5Scatterplot shows the statistically significant correlation (p = 0.01; R2 = 0.53) between macular hole diameter (μm) and microperimetry 2 degree sensitivity (dB).
Figure 6Scatterplot shows the statistically significant correlation (p = 0.0027; R2 = 0.65) between cavity areas in OPL + HFL complex (mm2) and microperimetry 2 degree sensitivity (dB).
Figure 7Scatterplot shows the statistically significant correlation (p = 0.0148; R2 = 0.50) between cavity areas on OPL + HFL complex (mm2) and microperimetry 4 degree sensitivity (dB).
Figure 8(A) Area of peak of flow in the choroidal slab (also named “choriocapillary transparency”) due to visibility of choroidal vessels caused by lack of neuroepithelium. (B) Scatterplot shows the statistically significant correlation (p = 0.04, R2 = 0.36) between the area of peak of flow in the choroidal slab (mm2) and microperimetry 2 degree sensitivity (DB).