Literature DB >> 15187653

Vitrectomy for chronic macular holes.

Lori A Stec1, Robin D Ross, George A Williams, Michael T Trese, Raymond R Margherio, Morton S Cox.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To address the efficacy of surgical intervention for chronic macular holes.
METHODS: The cases of 22 patients (23 eyes) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and use of 10% to 16% C3F8 gas for macular holes of duration of >1 year (mean, 4.2 years; range, 1.2-15 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/60 to 5/200 (mean, 20/278). Thirteen eyes (56.5%) had stage 3 macular holes, and 10 eyes (43.5%) had stage 4 macular holes. The mean age of the patients was 70.2 years (range, 47-78 years), and 20 (87%) were female.
RESULTS: Nineteen (83%) of 23 macular holes were closed at final follow-ups at >/=9 months (mean, 4.67 years; range, 0.9-10.8 years). With one operation that included ILM peeling, 13 (81%) of 16 eyes had holes that closed. Seven eyes on which initial surgery without ILM peeling failed underwent reoperation with ILM peeling, and all but one had closed holes. ILM peeling was significant for surgical success of one operation (Fisher exact test, P = 0.0005). Postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/30 to 20/800 (mean, 20/166). Improved vision with halving of the visual angle occurred in 16 eyes (70%). Nine eyes (39%) achieved visual acuity of 20/70 or better, and two eyes (8.7%) achieved visual acuity of 20/40 or better. One eye (4%) had worse visual acuity, and three eyes (13%) remained unchanged. Cataract was a possible cause of decreased vision in six eyes (26%) at the end of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Chronic macular holes can be surgically closed with visual improvement in most patients. ILM peeling is an important surgical factor for closure of the macular hole with one operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15187653     DOI: 10.1097/00006982-200406000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  18 in total

1.  Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  G A Williams
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Predictive values in macular hole repair.

Authors:  Hans Hoerauf
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Incomplete fluid-air exchange technique for idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Bo-Jie Hu; Xue-Li Du; Wen-Bo Li; Yu-Wen Chang; Xing-Dong Shi; Teng Ma; Yong Wang; Yan-Hua He; Rui Niu; Wei-Na Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Predictive value of preoperative optical coherence tomography for visual outcome following macular hole surgery: effects of imaging alignment.

Authors:  Wataru Matsumiya; Sentaro Kusuhara; Tsuyoshi Shimoyama; Shigeru Honda; Yasutomo Tsukahara; Akira Negi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Idiopathic macular hole: analysis of visual outcomes and the use of indocyanine green or brilliant blue for internal limiting membrane peel.

Authors:  Tom H Williamson; Edward Lee
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Re-operation of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes after initial surgery with internal limiting membrane peel.

Authors:  Mark J J D'Souza; Varun Chaudhary; Robert Devenyi; Peter J Kertes; Wai-Ching Lam
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Outcomes of chronic macular hole surgical repair.

Authors:  Shripaad Y Shukla; Armin R Afshar; Daniel F Kiernan; Seenu M Hariprasad
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo; Mitsuya Otsuka; Yumiko Hayashi; Masaaki Ishida; Atsushi Hayashi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial.

Authors:  Naresh Babu Kannan; Piyush Kohli; Haemoglobin Parida; O O Adenuga; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 10.  Optimal management of idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Haifa A Madi; Ibrahim Masri; David H Steel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.