Literature DB >> 11914205

Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery.

S Ullrich1, C Haritoglou, C Gass, M Schaumberger, M W Ulbig, A Kampik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: In 1991 there was a series of successful closures of a macular hole after vitrectomy and membrane peeling. Today this technique has become a standard procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of optical coherence tomography in diagnosing and staging, as well as in predicting, the functional and anatomical outcome after macular hole surgery.
METHOD: In a prospective study 94 consecutive patients (20 male, 74 female) with a mean age of 67.6 (SD 6.0) years and a macular hole stage II (n = 8), III (n = 72), and IV (n = 14) according to the classification by Gass were examined with optical coherence tomography (OCT) before pars plana vitrectomy. Macular hole diameters were determined at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (base diameter) and at the minimal extent of the hole (minimum diameter). Calculated hole form factor (HFF) was correlated with the postoperative anatomical success rate and best corrected visual acuity. The duration of symptoms was correlated with base and minimum diameter of the macular hole.
RESULTS: In eyes without anatomical closure of the macular hole after one surgical approach (13/94) the base diameter (p1) and the minimum diameter (p2) were significantly larger than in cases with immediate postsurgical closure (p1 = 0.003; p2 = 0.028). There was a significant negative correlation between both the base and the minimum diameter of the hole and the postoperative visual function (p1 = 0.016; p2 = 0.002). In all patients with HFF >0.9 the macular hole was closed following one surgical procedure, whereas in eyes with HFF <0.5 anatomical success rate was 67%. Better postoperative visual outcome correlated with higher HFF (p = 0.050). There was no significant correlation between the duration of symptoms and base or minimum diameters (p1 = 0.053; p2 = 0.164), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative measurement of macular hole size with OCT can provide a prognostic factor for postoperative visual outcome and anatomical success rate of macular hole surgery. The duration of symptoms did not correlate with the diameters measured. Base and minimum diameters especially seem to be of predictive value in macular hole surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11914205      PMCID: PMC1771090          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.4.390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  14 in total

1.  Detachment of Retina with Laceration at Macula.

Authors:  H D Noyes
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1871

2.  Macular hole surgery without face-down positioning. A pilot study.

Authors:  P E Tornambe; L S Poliner; K Grote
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Idiopathic senile macular hole. Its early stages and pathogenesis.

Authors:  J D Gass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-05

4.  [Prognostic factors in surgery of macular holes].

Authors:  U Mester; M Becker
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Optical coherence tomography of macular holes.

Authors:  M R Hee; C A Puliafito; C Wong; J S Duker; E Reichel; J S Schuman; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Macular hole surgery with internal-limiting membrane peeling and intravitreous air.

Authors:  D W Park; J O Sipperley; S R Sneed; P U Dugel; J Jacobsen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Macular changes after peeling of the internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  C Haritoglou; C A Gass; M Schaumberger; O Ehrt; A Gandorfer; A Kampik
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  W R Freeman; S P Azen; J W Kim; W el-Haig; D R Mishell; I Bailey
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-01

9.  Effect of perifoveal tissue dissection in the management of acute idiopathic full-thickness macular holes.

Authors:  R R Margherio; A R Margherio; G A Williams; D R Chow; M J Banach
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04

10.  Vitreous surgery for macular holes.

Authors:  R T Wendel; A C Patel; N E Kelly; T C Salzano; J W Wells; G D Novack
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  102 in total

1.  Restoration of macular structure as the determining factor for macular hole surgery outcome.

Authors:  José Maria Ruiz-Moreno; Francisco Lugo; Javier A Montero; David P Piñero
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  External limiting membrane and visual outcome in macular hole repair: spectral domain OCT analysis.

Authors:  G Landa; R C Gentile; P M T Garcia; T O Muldoon; R B Rosen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Continuous changes in macular morphology after macular hole closure visualized with spectral optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Zofia Michalewska; Janusz Michalewski; Jerzy Nawrocki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Enhanced vitreous imaging optical coherence tomography in primary macular holes.

Authors:  Atsushi Takahashi; Taiji Nagaoka; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Correlation between central retinal thickness after successful macular hole surgery and visual outcome.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Takamura; Takeshi Tomomatsu; Takehiro Matsumura; Shogo Arimura; Makoto Gozawa; Yuji Takihara; Masaru Inatani
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  A new method to predict anatomical outcome after idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Peipei Liu; Yaoyao Sun; Chongya Dong; Dan Song; Yanrong Jiang; Jianhong Liang; Hong Yin; Xiaoxin Li; Mingwei Zhao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Ethnic variation in primary idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  A Chandra; M Lai; D Mitry; P J Banerjee; H Flayeh; G Negretti; N Kumar; L Wickham
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  R Tadayoni; A Gaudric; B Haouchine; P Massin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Area and volume ratios for prediction of visual outcome in idiopathic macular hole.

Authors:  Xing-Yun Geng; Hui-Qun Wu; Jie-Hui Jiang; Kui Jiang; Jun Zhu; Yi Xu; Jian-Cheng Dong; Zhuang-Zhi Yan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Visual outcome correlates with inner macular volume in eyes with surgically closed macular hole.

Authors:  Suman Pilli; Robert J Zawadzki; John S Werner; Susanna S Park
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.