Literature DB >> 23620091

Long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of idiopathic macular hole surgery. The yield of spectral-domain OCT combined with microperimetry.

Arnaud Bonnabel1, Alain M Bron, Rodica Isaico, Brice Dugas, Frédéric Nicot, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correlations between anatomical and functional changes studied with microperimetry (MPM) and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) in patients after successful repair of idiopathic macular hole (MH).
METHODS: Monocentric, retrospective, interventional study in 23 eyes of 23 patients who underwent successful surgery for MH defined as closure of the hole, at least 1 year before. Reported data were pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity values on MPM, macular and foveal thicknesses, and retinal anatomic lesions on SD-OCT.
RESULTS: Macular sensitivity (MS) and foveal sensitivity (FS) were lower and the number of lesions of the outer retinal layers was higher in patients with a poorer postoperative VA (P = 0.029, P = 0.011 and P = 0.003 respectively). Preoperative MH size was lower and MS and FS were better in patients with a preserved junction line between the inner and outer segments of photoreceptors (IS/OS) (P = 0.045, P = 0.001, and P = 0.001 respectively). Better postoperative VA was correlated with better preoperative VA (P = 0.012, r = 0.513). Postoperative VA was correlated with MS and FS (P = 0.032, r = 0.449, and P = 0.019, r = 0.483 respectively). Greater foveal thickness was associated with better postoperative VA (P = 0.020, r = 0.482).
CONCLUSION: Postoperative outer retinal layer integrity is associated with better final retinal sensitivity. Further studies are warranted to assess the role of SD-OCT and microperimetry in the pre- and postoperative evaluation of idiopathic macular holes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23620091     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2339-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of macular microstructure assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with spontaneous resolution of macular hole.

Authors:  Maiko Inoue; Akira Arakawa; Shin Yamane; Yoichiro Watanabe; Kazuaki Kadonosono
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Photoreceptor damage and foveal sensitivity in surgically closed macular holes: an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study.

Authors:  Sotaro Ooto; Masanori Hangai; Kohei Takayama; Naoko Ueda-Arakawa; Masaaki Hanebuchi; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Reading ability and retinal sensitivity after surgery for macular hole and macular pucker.

Authors:  Ezio Cappello; Gianni Virgili; Luigina Tollot; Michele Del Borrello; Ugo Menchini; Marco Zemella
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Restored photoreceptor outer segment and visual recovery after macular hole closure.

Authors:  Morihiko Sano; Yukitoshi Shimoda; Hideaki Hashimoto; Shoji Kishi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Photoreceptor layer assessed in tissue layer image using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography after surgical closure of macular hole.

Authors:  Na Mi Kim; Hyun Jun Park; Gi Hong Koo; Ji Eun Lee; Boo Sup Oum
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Long-term anatomic and visual outcomes of initially closed macular holes.

Authors:  Qianli Meng; Shaochong Zhang; Yunlan Ling; Dongmei Cui; Yixuan Jin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Makoto Inoue; Tosho Rii; Tomoyuki Hiraoka; Akito Hirakata
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Effect of preoperative retinal sensitivity and fixation on long-term prognosis for idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Zhongcui Sun; Dekang Gan; Chunhui Jiang; Min Wang; Alicia Sprecher; Alice C Jiang; Gezhi Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Foveal microstructure on spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images and visual function after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Emi Ooka; Yoshinori Mitamura; Takayuki Baba; Masayasu Kitahashi; Toshiyuki Oshitari; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Combined three-dimensional spectral OCT/SLO topography and Microperimetry: steps toward achieving functional spectral OCT/SLO.

Authors:  Gennady Landa; Richard B Rosen; Patricia M T Garcia; William H Seiple
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 2.892

View more
  9 in total

1.  Functional Outcome After Macular Hole Surgery: Comparison of Standard Perimetry with Microperimetry.

Authors:  Juliana Wons; Isabel B Pfister; Stefano Anastasi; Sonja Steinhauer; Sophie-Alexia Niderprim; Justus G Garweg
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-11

2.  Secondary Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Plug due to Persistent Full-Thickness Macular Hole OCT-Angiography and Microperimetry Features: Case Series.

Authors:  Dominika Wrzesińska; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Dominika Nowakowska; Mario Damiano Toro; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Michele Reibaldi; Teresio Avitabile; Robert Rejdak
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  [Biomarkers in full-thickness and lamellar defects of the macula].

Authors:  M Maier; R Schumann; J Friedrich; J Klaas; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.174

4.  Preoperative and postoperative features of macular holes on en face imaging and optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Abtin Shahlaee; Ehsan Rahimy; Jason Hsu; Omesh P Gupta; Allen C Ho
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-29

5.  Vertical and Horizontal M-Charts and Microperimetry for Assessment of the Visual Function in Patients after Vitrectomy with ILM Peeling due to Stage 4 Macular Hole.

Authors:  Dominika Wrzesińska; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Dominika Nowakowska; Agnieszka Brzozowska; Teresio Avitabile; Michele Reibaldi; Robert Rejdak; Mario Toro
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Inverted internal limiting membrane-flap technique for large macular hole: a microperimetric study.

Authors:  Giancarlo Sborgia; Alfredo Niro; Alessandra Sborgia; Valeria Albano; Tiziana Tritto; Luigi Sborgia; Valentina Pastore; Rossella Donghia; Ermete Giancipoli; Nicola Recchimurzo; Francesco Boscia; Giovanni Alessio
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2019-10-18

7.  Evaluation of retinal functional changes after macular hole surgery using heavy brilliant blue G dye for internal limiting membrane staining: A prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Naresh Babu Kannan; Anirban Chakrabarti; Sagnik Sen; Renu P Rajan; Karthik Kumar; Girish Baliga; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Morpho-Functional Evaluation of Full-Thickness Macular Holes by the Integration of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Microperimetry.

Authors:  Daniela Bacherini; Maria Cristina Savastano; Francesco Dragotto; Lucia Finocchio; Chiara Lenzetti; Alice Bitossi; Ruggero Tartaro; Fabrizio Giansanti; Francesco Barca; Alfonso Savastano; Tomaso Caporossi; Lorenzo Vannozzi; Andrea Sodi; Marino De Luca; Francesco Faraldi; Gianni Virgili; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Inverted ILM-flap techniques variants for macular hole surgery: randomized clinical trial to compare retinal sensitivity and fixation stability.

Authors:  Andrea Cacciamani; Aldo Gelso; Marta Di Nicola; Fabio Scarinci; Guido Ripandelli; Ciro Costagliola; Tommaso Rossi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.