Literature DB >> 3159833

Binocular distance perception: egocentric distance tasks.

J M Foley.   

Abstract

This study extends and tests a theory of binocular distance perception that has been shown to give a good account of performance in relative distance tasks. Here the theory is tested in two experiments in which the observer directly indicates perceived egocentric distance of targets (perceived distance from himself or herself) by means of a verbal report or manual pointing response. In the first, the distance to two targets is varied while maintaining a constant disparity between them. In the second, one target is held fixed while the distance to a second target is varied. In each case, the observer indicates the perceived distance of each target. Manual and verbal responses are found to agree with each other to within a linear transform. Both sets of data are shown to be consistent with the theory and are used to estimate the parameters of the theory. There is no other theory that predicts these results.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3159833     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.2.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Depth compression based on mis-scaling of binocular disparity may contribute to angular expansion in perceived optical slant.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Expectation affects verbal judgments but not reaches to visually perceived egocentric distances.

Authors:  Christopher C Pagano; Robert W Isenhower
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

6.  Defaults in stereoscopic and kinetic depth perception.

Authors:  L L Kontsevich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

8.  A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues.

Authors:  D W Eby; J M Loomis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-04

9.  Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Zhuolun Li; Ke Zhang; Quan Lei
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

10.  Organizational factors and the perception of motion in depth.

Authors:  D H Mershon; T A Jones; M E Taylor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.