R A Rava1,2, K V Snyder3,2, M Mokin4, M Waqas3,2, A B Allman5,2, J L Senko5,2, A R Podgorsak5,3,6,2, M M Shiraz Bhurwani5,2, Y Hoi7, A H Siddiqui3,2, J M Davies3,2, E I Levy3,2, C N Ionita5,3,2. 1. From the Departments of Biomedical Engineering (R.A.R., A.B.A., J.L.S., A.R.P., M.M.S.B., C.N.I.) ryanrava@buffalo.edu. 2. Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center (R.A.R., K.V.S., M.W., A.B.A., J.L.S., A.R.P., M.M.S.B., A.H.S., J.M.D., E.I.L., C.N.I.), Buffalo, New York. 3. Neurosurgery (K.V.S., M.W., A.R.P., A.H.S., J.M.D., E.I.L., C.N.I.). 4. Department of Neurosurgery (M.M.), University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. 5. From the Departments of Biomedical Engineering (R.A.R., A.B.A., J.L.S., A.R.P., M.M.S.B., C.N.I.). 6. Medical Physics (A.R.P.). 7. Canon Medical Systems USA (Y.H.), Tustin, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain CTP is used to estimate infarct and penumbra volumes to determine endovascular treatment eligibility for patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a Bayesian CTP algorithm in determining penumbra and final infarct volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected for 105 patients with acute ischemic stroke (55 patients with successful recanalization [TICI 2b/2c/3] and large-vessel occlusions and 50 patients without interventions). Final infarct volumes were calculated using DWI and FLAIR 24 hours following CTP imaging. RAPID and the Vitrea Bayesian CTP algorithm (with 3 different settings) predicted infarct and penumbra volumes for comparison with final infarct volumes to assess software performance. Vitrea settings used different combinations of perfusion maps (MTT, TTP, CBV, CBF, delay time) for infarct and penumbra quantification. Patients with and without interventions were included for assessment of predicted infarct and penumbra volumes, respectively. RESULTS: RAPID and Vitrea default setting had the most accurate final infarct volume prediction in patients with interventions ([Spearman correlation coefficient, mean infarct difference] default versus FLAIR: [0.77, 4.1 mL], default versus DWI: [0.72, 4.7 mL], RAPID versus FLAIR: [0.75, 7.5 mL], RAPID versus DWI: [0.75, 6.9 mL]). Default Vitrea and RAPID were the most and least accurate in determining final infarct volume for patients without an intervention, respectively (default versus FLAIR: [0.76, -0.4 mL], default versus DWI: [0.71, -2.6 mL], RAPID versus FLAIR: [0.68, -49.3 mL], RAPID versus DWI: [0.65, -51.5 mL]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with RAPID, the Vitrea default setting was noninferior for patients with interventions and superior in penumbra estimation for patients without interventions as indicated by mean infarct differences and correlations with final infarct volumes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain CTP is used to estimate infarct and penumbra volumes to determine endovascular treatment eligibility for patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a Bayesian CTP algorithm in determining penumbra and final infarct volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected for 105 patients with acute ischemic stroke (55 patients with successful recanalization [TICI 2b/2c/3] and large-vessel occlusions and 50 patients without interventions). Final infarct volumes were calculated using DWI and FLAIR 24 hours following CTP imaging. RAPID and the Vitrea Bayesian CTP algorithm (with 3 different settings) predicted infarct and penumbra volumes for comparison with final infarct volumes to assess software performance. Vitrea settings used different combinations of perfusion maps (MTT, TTP, CBV, CBF, delay time) for infarct and penumbra quantification. Patients with and without interventions were included for assessment of predicted infarct and penumbra volumes, respectively. RESULTS: RAPID and Vitrea default setting had the most accurate final infarct volume prediction in patients with interventions ([Spearman correlation coefficient, mean infarct difference] default versus FLAIR: [0.77, 4.1 mL], default versus DWI: [0.72, 4.7 mL], RAPID versus FLAIR: [0.75, 7.5 mL], RAPID versus DWI: [0.75, 6.9 mL]). Default Vitrea and RAPID were the most and least accurate in determining final infarct volume for patients without an intervention, respectively (default versus FLAIR: [0.76, -0.4 mL], default versus DWI: [0.71, -2.6 mL], RAPID versus FLAIR: [0.68, -49.3 mL], RAPID versus DWI: [0.65, -51.5 mL]). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with RAPID, the Vitrea default setting was noninferior for patients with interventions and superior in penumbra estimation for patients without interventions as indicated by mean infarct differences and correlations with final infarct volumes.
Authors: Miou S Koopman; Olvert A Berkhemer; Ralph R E G Geuskens; Bart J Emmer; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Wim H van Zwam; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Aad van der Lugt; Diederik W J Dippel; Ludo F Beenen; Yvo B W E M Roos; Henk A Marquering; Charles B L M Majoie Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: William J Powers; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Teri Ackerson; Opeolu M Adeoye; Nicholas C Bambakidis; Kyra Becker; José Biller; Michael Brown; Bart M Demaerschalk; Brian Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea S Kidwell; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Phillip A Scott; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew M Southerland; Deborah V Summers; David L Tirschwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: K Nael; B Mossadeghi; T Boutelier; W Kubal; E A Krupinski; J Dagher; J P Villablanca Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Anke Wouters; Søren Christensen; Matus Straka; Michael Mlynash; John Liggins; Roland Bammer; Vincent Thijs; Robin Lemmens; Gregory W Albers; Maarten G Lansberg Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Muhammad Waqas; Ariana B Allman; Jillian L Senko; Alexander R Podgorsak; Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2020-06-23
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Alexander R Podgorsak; Muhammad Waqas; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Elad I Levy; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2021-02-10
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Alexander R Podgorsak; Muhammad Waqas; Kenneth V Snyder; Elad I Levy; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2021-02-15
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Blake A Peterson; Samantha E Seymour; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Muhammad Waqas; Yiemeng Hoi; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2021-03-03
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Muhammad Waqas; Alexander R Podgorsak; Ariana B Allman; Jillian Senko; Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Yiemeng Hoi; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2021-01-21
Authors: Kamil Zeleňák; Antonín Krajina; Lukas Meyer; Jens Fiehler; Daniel Behme; Deniz Bulja; Jildaz Caroff; Amar Ajay Chotai; Valerio Da Ros; Jean-Christophe Gentric; Jeremy Hofmeister; Omar Kass-Hout; Özcan Kocatürk; Jeremy Lynch; Ernesto Pearson; Ivan Vukasinovic Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-05-27