Ryan A Rava1,2, Alexander R Podgorsak1,2,3, Muhammad Waqas2,4, Kenneth V Snyder2,4, Maxim Mokin5, Elad I Levy2,4, Jason M Davies2,4,6, Adnan H Siddiqui2,4, Ciprian N Ionita1,2,3,4. 1. University at Buffalo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States. 2. Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, Buffalo, New York, United States. 3. University at Buffalo, Department of Medical Physics, Buffalo New York, United States. 4. University at Buffalo, Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo, New York, United States. 5. University of South Florida, Department of Neurosurgery, Tampa, Florida, United States. 6. University at Buffalo, Department of Bioinformatics, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity, infarct is segmented using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) software, such as RAPID, Sphere, and Vitrea, relying on contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Since this approach is potentially patient dependent, we investigated whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs) could achieve better performances without the need for contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Approach: CTP and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data were retrospectively collected for 63 AIS patients. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time-to-peak, mean-transit-time (MTT), and delay time maps were generated using Vitrea CTP software. U-net shaped CNNs were developed, trained, and tested for 26 different input CTP parameter combinations. Infarct labels were segmented from DWI volumes registered with CTP volumes. Infarct volumes were reconstructed from two-dimensional CTP infarct segmentations. To remove erroneous segmentations, conditional random field (CRF) postprocessing was applied and compared with prior results. Spatial and volumetric infarct agreement was assessed between DWI and CTP (CNNs and commercial software) using median infarct difference, median absolute error, dice coefficient, positive predictive value. Results: The most accurate combination of parameters for CNN segmenting infarct using CRF postprocessing was CBF, CBV, and MTT (4.83 mL, 10.14 mL, 0.66, 0.73). Commercial software results are: RAPID = (2.25 mL, 21.48 mL, 0.63, 0.70), Sphere = (7.57 mL, 17.74 mL, 0.64, 0.70), Vitrea = (6.79 mL, 15.28 mL, 0.63, 0.72). Conclusions: Use of CNNs with multiple input perfusion parameters has shown to be accurate in segmenting infarcts and has the ability to improve clinical workflow by eliminating the need for contralateral hemisphere comparisons.
Purpose: To assess acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity, infarct is segmented using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) software, such as RAPID, Sphere, and Vitrea, relying on contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Since this approach is potentially patient dependent, we investigated whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs) could achieve better performances without the need for contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Approach: CTP and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data were retrospectively collected for 63 AIS patients. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time-to-peak, mean-transit-time (MTT), and delay time maps were generated using Vitrea CTP software. U-net shaped CNNs were developed, trained, and tested for 26 different input CTP parameter combinations. Infarct labels were segmented from DWI volumes registered with CTP volumes. Infarct volumes were reconstructed from two-dimensional CTP infarct segmentations. To remove erroneous segmentations, conditional random field (CRF) postprocessing was applied and compared with prior results. Spatial and volumetric infarct agreement was assessed between DWI and CTP (CNNs and commercial software) using median infarct difference, median absolute error, dice coefficient, positive predictive value. Results: The most accurate combination of parameters for CNN segmenting infarct using CRF postprocessing was CBF, CBV, and MTT (4.83 mL, 10.14 mL, 0.66, 0.73). Commercial software results are: RAPID = (2.25 mL, 21.48 mL, 0.63, 0.70), Sphere = (7.57 mL, 17.74 mL, 0.64, 0.70), Vitrea = (6.79 mL, 15.28 mL, 0.63, 0.72). Conclusions: Use of CNNs with multiple input perfusion parameters has shown to be accurate in segmenting infarcts and has the ability to improve clinical workflow by eliminating the need for contralateral hemisphere comparisons.
Authors: Krishna A Dani; Ralph G R Thomas; Francesca M Chappell; Kirsten Shuler; Mary J MacLeod; Keith W Muir; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Maxim Mokin; Alexander A Khalessi; J Mocco; Giuseppe Lanzino; Travis M Dumont; Ricardo A Hanel; Demetrius K Lopes; Richard D Fessler; Andrew J Ringer; Bernard R Bendok; Erol Veznedaroglu; Adnan H Siddiqui; L Nelson Hopkins; Elad I Levy Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Muhammad Waqas; Xiaoliang Zhang; Alexander R Podgorsak; Ariana B Allman; Jillian Senko; Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Yiemeng Hoi; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Tudor G Jovin; Jeffrey L Saver; Marc Ribo; Vitor Pereira; Anthony Furlan; Alain Bonafe; Blaise Baxter; Rishi Gupta; Demetrius Lopes; Olav Jansen; Wade Smith; Daryl Gress; Steven Hetts; Roger J Lewis; Ryan Shields; Scott M Berry; Todd L Graves; Tim Malisch; Ansaar Rai; Kevin N Sheth; David S Liebeskind; Raul G Nogueira Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 5.266