Shota Ichikawa1, Hiroyuki Yamamoto2, Takumi Morita3. 1. Department of Radiological Technology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, 710-8602, Japan. s-ichikawa@frontier.hokudai.ac.jp. 2. Department of Radiological Technology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, 710-8602, Japan. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, 710-8602, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A variety of postprocessing algorithms for CT perfusion are available, with substantial differences in terms of quantitative maps. Although potential advantages of a Bayesian estimation algorithm are suggested, direct comparison with other algorithms in clinical settings remains scarce. We aimed to compare performance of a Bayesian estimation algorithm and singular value decomposition (SVD) algorithms for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke using an 80-detector row CT perfusion. METHODS: CT perfusion data of 36 patients with acute ischemic stroke were analyzed using the Vitrea implemented a standard SVD algorithm, a reformulated SVD algorithm and a Bayesian estimation algorithm. Correlations and statistical differences between affected and contralateral sides of quantitative parameters (cerebral blood volume [CBV], cerebral blood flow [CBF], mean transit time [MTT], time to peak [TTP] and delay) were analyzed. Agreement of the CT perfusion-estimated and the follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging-derived infarct volume were evaluated by nonparametric Passing-Bablok regression analysis. RESULTS: CBF and MTT of the Bayesian estimation algorithm were substantially different and showed a better correlation with the standard SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.78 and 0.80, p < 0.001) than with the reformulated SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.59 and 0.39, p < 0.001). There is no significant difference in MTT only when using the reformulated SVD algorithm (p = 0.217). Regarding the regression lines, the slope and intercept were nearly ideal with the Bayesian estimation algorithm (y = 2.42 x-6.51; ρ = 0.60, p < 0.001) in comparison with the SVD algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The Bayesian estimation algorithm can lead to a better performance compared with the SVD algorithms in the assessment of acute ischemic stroke because of better delineation of abnormal perfusion areas and accurate estimation of infarct volume.
PURPOSE: A variety of postprocessing algorithms for CT perfusion are available, with substantial differences in terms of quantitative maps. Although potential advantages of a Bayesian estimation algorithm are suggested, direct comparison with other algorithms in clinical settings remains scarce. We aimed to compare performance of a Bayesian estimation algorithm and singular value decomposition (SVD) algorithms for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke using an 80-detector row CT perfusion. METHODS: CT perfusion data of 36 patients with acute ischemic stroke were analyzed using the Vitrea implemented a standard SVD algorithm, a reformulated SVD algorithm and a Bayesian estimation algorithm. Correlations and statistical differences between affected and contralateral sides of quantitative parameters (cerebral blood volume [CBV], cerebral blood flow [CBF], mean transit time [MTT], time to peak [TTP] and delay) were analyzed. Agreement of the CT perfusion-estimated and the follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging-derived infarct volume were evaluated by nonparametric Passing-Bablok regression analysis. RESULTS: CBF and MTT of the Bayesian estimation algorithm were substantially different and showed a better correlation with the standard SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.78 and 0.80, p < 0.001) than with the reformulated SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.59 and 0.39, p < 0.001). There is no significant difference in MTT only when using the reformulated SVD algorithm (p = 0.217). Regarding the regression lines, the slope and intercept were nearly ideal with the Bayesian estimation algorithm (y = 2.42 x-6.51; ρ = 0.60, p < 0.001) in comparison with the SVD algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The Bayesian estimation algorithm can lead to a better performance compared with the SVD algorithms in the assessment of acute ischemic stroke because of better delineation of abnormal perfusion areas and accurate estimation of infarct volume.
Authors: K Nael; B Mossadeghi; T Boutelier; W Kubal; E A Krupinski; J Dagher; J P Villablanca Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: F Fahmi; H A Marquering; G J Streekstra; L F M Beenen; B K Velthuis; E VanBavel; C B Majoie Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T E Mayer; G F Hamann; J Baranczyk; B Rosengarten; E Klotz; M Wiesmann; U Missler; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; H J Brueckmann Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Friederike Austein; Christian Riedel; Tina Kerby; Johannes Meyne; Andreas Binder; Thomas Lindner; Monika Huhndorf; Fritz Wodarg; Olav Jansen Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 7.914