Ryan A Rava1,2, Alexander R Podgorsak1,2,3, Muhammad Waqas2,4, Kenneth V Snyder2,4, Elad I Levy2,4, Jason M Davies2,4, Adnan H Siddiqui2,4, Ciprian N Ionita1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo NY, 14260. 2. Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo NY, 14203. 3. Department of Medical Physics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo NY, 14260. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine, Buffalo NY, 14203.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is used to diagnose ischemic strokes through contralateral hemisphere comparisons of various perfusion parameters. Various perfusion parameter thresholds have been utilized to segment infarct tissue due to differences in CTP software and patient baseline hemodynamics. This study utilized a convolutional neural network (CNN) to eliminate the need for non-universal parameter thresholds to segment infarct tissue. METHODS: CTP data from 63 ischemic stroke patients was retrospectively collected and perfusion parameter maps were generated using Vitrea CTP software. Infarct ground truth labels were segmented from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and CTP and DWI volumes were registered. A U-net based CNN was trained and tested five separate times using each CTP parameter (cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time-to-peak (TTP), mean-transit-time (MTT), delay time). 8,352 infarct slices were utilized with a 60:30:10 training:testing:validation split and Monte Carlo cross-validation was conducted using 20 iterations. Infarct volumes were reconstructed following segmentation from each CTP slice. Infarct spatial and volumetric agreement was compared between each CTP parameter and DWI. RESULTS: Spatial agreement metrics (Dice coefficient, positive predictive value) for each CTP parameter in predicting infarct volumes are: CBF=(0.67, 0.76), CBV=(0.44, 0.62), TTP=(0.60, 0.67), MTT=(0.58, 0.62), delay time=(0.57, 0.60). 95% confidence intervals for volume differences with DWI infarct are: CBF=14.3±11.5 mL, CBV=29.6±21.2 mL, TTP=7.7±15.2 mL, MTT=-10.7±18.6 mL, delay time=-5.7±23.6 mL. CONCLUSIONS: CBF is the most accurate CTP parameter in segmenting infarct tissue. Segmentation of infarct using a CNN has the potential to eliminate non-universal CTP contralateral hemisphere comparison thresholds.
PURPOSE: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is used to diagnose ischemic strokes through contralateral hemisphere comparisons of various perfusion parameters. Various perfusion parameter thresholds have been utilized to segment infarct tissue due to differences in CTP software and patient baseline hemodynamics. This study utilized a convolutional neural network (CNN) to eliminate the need for non-universal parameter thresholds to segment infarct tissue. METHODS: CTP data from 63 ischemic stroke patients was retrospectively collected and perfusion parameter maps were generated using Vitrea CTP software. Infarct ground truth labels were segmented from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and CTP and DWI volumes were registered. A U-net based CNN was trained and tested five separate times using each CTP parameter (cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time-to-peak (TTP), mean-transit-time (MTT), delay time). 8,352 infarct slices were utilized with a 60:30:10 training:testing:validation split and Monte Carlo cross-validation was conducted using 20 iterations. Infarct volumes were reconstructed following segmentation from each CTP slice. Infarct spatial and volumetric agreement was compared between each CTP parameter and DWI. RESULTS: Spatial agreement metrics (Dice coefficient, positive predictive value) for each CTP parameter in predicting infarct volumes are: CBF=(0.67, 0.76), CBV=(0.44, 0.62), TTP=(0.60, 0.67), MTT=(0.58, 0.62), delay time=(0.57, 0.60). 95% confidence intervals for volume differences with DWI infarct are: CBF=14.3±11.5 mL, CBV=29.6±21.2 mL, TTP=7.7±15.2 mL, MTT=-10.7±18.6 mL, delay time=-5.7±23.6 mL. CONCLUSIONS: CBF is the most accurate CTP parameter in segmenting infarct tissue. Segmentation of infarct using a CNN has the potential to eliminate non-universal CTP contralateral hemisphere comparison thresholds.
Authors: Alex Graves; Marcus Liwicki; Santiago Fernández; Roman Bertolami; Horst Bunke; Jürgen Schmidhuber Journal: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.226
Authors: Krishna A Dani; Ralph G R Thomas; Francesca M Chappell; Kirsten Shuler; Mary J MacLeod; Keith W Muir; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Houchun H Hu; Zhiqiang Li; Amber L Pokorney; Jonathan M Chia; Niccolo Stefani; James G Pipe; Jeffrey H Miller Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-08-28 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Maxim Mokin; Alexander A Khalessi; J Mocco; Giuseppe Lanzino; Travis M Dumont; Ricardo A Hanel; Demetrius K Lopes; Richard D Fessler; Andrew J Ringer; Bernard R Bendok; Erol Veznedaroglu; Adnan H Siddiqui; L Nelson Hopkins; Elad I Levy Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Maxim Mokin; Kenneth V Snyder; Muhammad Waqas; Adnan H Siddiqui; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2020-02-11
Authors: L Legrand; M Tisserand; G Turc; O Naggara; M Edjlali; C Mellerio; J-L Mas; J-F Méder; J-C Baron; C Oppenheim Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ryan A Rava; Blake A Peterson; Samantha E Seymour; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Muhammad Waqas; Yiemeng Hoi; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2021-03-03