Golara Golbaghi1, Irène Pitard1, Matthieu Lucas1, Mohammad Mehdi Haghdoost1, Yossef López de Los Santos1, Nicolas Doucet1, Shunmoogum A Patten1, J Thomas Sanderson1, Annie Castonguay2. 1. Organometallic Chemistry Laboratory for the Design of Catalysts and Therapeutics, and Endocrine Toxicology Laboratory, INRS-Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Université du Québec, Laval, Canada. 2. Organometallic Chemistry Laboratory for the Design of Catalysts and Therapeutics, and Endocrine Toxicology Laboratory, INRS-Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Université du Québec, Laval, Canada. Electronic address: annie.castonguay@inrs.ca.
Abstract
Ruthenium-based complexes currently attract great attention as they hold promise to replace platinum-based drugs as a first line cancer treatment. Whereas ruthenium arene complexes are some of the most studied species for their potential anticancer properties, other types of ruthenium complexes have been overlooked for this purpose. Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of Ru(II) cyclopentadienyl (Cp), Ru(II) cyclooctadienyl (COD) and Ru(III) complexes bearing anastrozole or letrozole ligands, third-generation aromatase inhibitors currently used for the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer. Among these complexes, Ru(II)Cp 2 was the only one that displayed a high stability in DMSO and in cell culture media and consequently, the only complex for which the in vitro and in vivo biological activities were investigated. Unlike anastrozole alone, complex 2 was considerably cytotoxic in vitro (IC50 values < 1 μM) in human ER + breast cancer (T47D and MCF7), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (MBA-MB-231), and in adrenocortical carcinoma (H295R) cells. Theoretical (docking simulation) and experimental (aromatase catalytic activity) studies suggested that an interaction between 2 and the aromatase enzyme was not likely to occur and that the bulkiness of the PPh3 ligands could be an important factor preventing the complex to reach the active site of the enzyme. Exposure of zebrafish embryos to complex 2 at concentrations around its in vitro cytotoxicity IC50 value (0.1-1 μM) did not lead to noticeable signs of toxicity over 96 h, making it a suitable candidate for further in vivo investigations. This study confirms the potential of Ru(II)Cp complexes for breast cancer therapy, more specifically against TNBCs that are usually not responsive to currently used chemotherapeutic agents.
Ruthenium-based complexes currently attract great attention as they hold promise to replace n class="Chemical">platinum-based drugs as a first line cancer treatment. Whereas ruthenium arene complexes are some of the most studied species for their potential anticancer properties, other types of ruthenium complexes have been overlooked for this purpose. Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of Ru(II) cyclopentadienyl (Cp), Ru(II) cyclooctadienyl (COD) and Ru(III) complexes bearing anastrozole or letrozole ligands, third-generation aromatase inhibitors currently used for the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer. Among these complexes, Ru(II)Cp 2 was the only one that displayed a high stability in DMSO and in cell culture media and consequently, the only complex for which the in vitro and in vivo biological activities were investigated. Unlike anastrozole alone, complex 2 was considerably cytotoxic in vitro (IC50 values < 1 μM) in humanER + breast cancer (T47D and MCF7), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (MBA-MB-231), and in adrenocortical carcinoma (H295R) cells. Theoretical (docking simulation) and experimental (aromatase catalytic activity) studies suggested that an interaction between 2 and the aromatase enzyme was not likely to occur and that the bulkiness of the PPh3 ligands could be an important factor preventing the complex to reach the active site of the enzyme. Exposure of zebrafish embryos to complex 2 at concentrations around its in vitro cytotoxicity IC50 value (0.1-1 μM) did not lead to noticeable signs of toxicity over 96 h, making it a suitable candidate for further in vivo investigations. This study confirms the potential of Ru(II)Cp complexes for breast cancer therapy, more specifically against TNBCs that are usually not responsive to currently used chemotherapeutic agents.
Keywords:
Aromatase inhibitor; Breast cancer therapy; Estrogen receptor positive breast cancer; Ruthenium complex; Triple negative breast cancer; Zebrafish
Authors: Suzanne Leijen; Sjaak A Burgers; Paul Baas; Dick Pluim; Matthijs Tibben; Erik van Werkhoven; Enzo Alessio; Gianni Sava; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Elmar Krieger; Keehyoung Joo; Jinwoo Lee; Jooyoung Lee; Srivatsan Raman; James Thompson; Mike Tyka; David Baker; Kevin Karplus Journal: Proteins Date: 2009
Authors: Tânia S Morais; Andreia Valente; Ana Isabel Tomaz; Fernanda Marques; Maria Helena Garcia Journal: Future Med Chem Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 3.808
Authors: Leonor Côrte-Real; Ricardo G Teixeira; Patrícia Gírio; Elisabeta Comsa; Alexis Moreno; Rachad Nasr; Hélène Baubichon-Cortay; Fernando Avecilla; Fernanda Marques; M Paula Robalo; Paulo Mendes; João P Prates Ramalho; M Helena Garcia; Pierre Falson; Andreia Valente Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Susan Monro; Katsuya L Colón; Huimin Yin; John Roque; Prathyusha Konda; Shashi Gujar; Randolph P Thummel; Lothar Lilge; Colin G Cameron; Sherri A McFarland Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Maria Azmanova; Laia Rafols; Patricia A Cooper; Colin C Seaton; Steven D Shnyder; Anaïs Pitto-Barry Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 3.461
Authors: Raphael T Ryan; Dmytro Havrylyuk; Kimberly C Stevens; L Henry Moore; Sean Parkin; Jessica S Blackburn; David K Heidary; John P Selegue; Edith C Glazer Journal: Eur J Inorg Chem Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 2.551
Authors: Raphael T Ryan; Dmytro Havrylyuk; Kimberly C Stevens; L Henry Moore; Doo Young Kim; Jessica S Blackburn; David K Heidary; John P Selegue; Edith C Glazer Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 4.569