Literature DB >> 31944836

Denials of Judicial Bypass Petitions for Abortion in Texas Before and After the 2016 Bypass Process Change: 2001-2018.

Amanda Jean Stevenson1, Kate Coleman-Minahan1, Susan Hays1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To estimate the percentage of Texas judicial bypass petitions for abortion denied annually from 2001 to 2018, and to assess whether that fraction changed after the state's 2016 bypass process change.Methods. Because official statistics on Texas judicial bypass case counts and outcomes are only available for 2016 and later, we systematically reviewed monthly internal reports from Jane's Due Process (JDP), an organization providing legal representation to pregnant minors seeking bypass from 2001 to 2018. We report numbers and percentages of JDP cases denied for 2001 to 2018 and numbers and percentages of all cases denied from official Texas statistics for 2016 to 2018 (all available years).Results. At least 1 denial occurred in 11 out of 15 years observed before the bypass law changed in Texas (percentages = 0%-6.2%). After Texas made its bypass process more restrictive, the percentage denied increased (from 2.8% in 2015 to 10.3% in 2016 among JDP cases).Conclusions. We found the greatest percentages of judicial bypass for abortion petitions denied after the policy was implemented and after the bypass process changed. Judicial bypass for abortion may expose pregnant minors to judicial veto of their abortion decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31944836      PMCID: PMC7002964          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.

Authors:  J Shoshanna Ehrlich
Journal:  Berkeley Womens Law J       Date:  2003

2.  Changes in abortions and births and the Texas parental notification law.

Authors:  Theodore Joyce; Robert Kaestner; Silvie Colman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Minors' behavioral responses to parental involvement laws: delaying abortion until age 18.

Authors:  Silvie Colman; Ted Joyce
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2009-06

4.  Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States.

Authors:  Onur Altindag; Ted Joyce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Young Women's Experiences Obtaining Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Texas.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Emily Obront; Susan Hays
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Self-reported Physical Health of Women Who Did and Did Not Terminate Pregnancy After Seeking Abortion Services: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lauren J Ralph; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Daniel Grossman; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The Impact of a Parental Notification Requirement on Illinois Minors' Access to and Decision-Making Around Abortion.

Authors:  Lauren J Ralph; Erin King; Elise Belusa; Diana Greene Foster; Claire D Brindis; M Antonia Biggs
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion.

Authors:  Elizabeth Janiak; Isabel R Fulcher; Alischer A Cottrill; Nicole Tantoco; Ashley H Mason; Jennifer Fortin; Jamie Sabino; Alisa B Goldberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.661

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Judicial bypass attorneys' experiences with abortion stigma in Texas courts.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Emily Obront; Susan Hays
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The Financial Burden of Antiquated Laws: The Case of Massachusetts' Parental Involvement Law for Abortion.

Authors:  Allison L Gilbert; Isabel R Fulcher; Alischer A Cottrill; Elizabeth Janiak
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-11-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.