Literature DB >> 31181576

Self-reported Physical Health of Women Who Did and Did Not Terminate Pregnancy After Seeking Abortion Services: A Cohort Study.

Lauren J Ralph1, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz2, Daniel Grossman1, Diana Greene Foster1.   

Abstract

Background: Research demonstrates worse short-term morbidity and mortality associated with childbirth than with abortion, but little research has examined long-term physical health in women with unwanted pregnancies after abortion versus childbirth. Objective: To examine the physical health of women who seek and receive or are denied abortion. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: 30 U.S. abortion facilities from 2008 to 2010. Participants: Of 1132 women seeking abortion who consented to participate, 874 were included in this analysis (328 who had first-trimester abortion, 383 who had second-trimester abortion, and 163 who gave birth). Measurements: Self-reported overall health; chronic abdominal, pelvic, back, and joint pain; chronic headaches or migraines; obesity; asthma; gestational and nongestational hypertension and diabetes; and hyperlipidemia were assessed semiannually for 5 years. Mortality was assessed by using verbal autopsy and public records.
Results: No significant differences were observed in self-rated health or chronic pain after first-trimester versus second-trimester abortion. At 5 years, 27% (95% CI, 21% to 34%) of women who gave birth reported fair or poor health compared with 20% (CI, 16% to 24%) of women who had first-trimester abortion and 21% (CI, 18% to 25%) who had second-trimester abortion. Women who gave birth also reported more chronic headaches or migraines and joint pain, but experienced similar levels of other types of chronic pain and obesity. Gestational hypertension was reported by 9.4% of participants who gave birth. Eight of 1132 participants died during follow-up, 2 in the postpartum period. Maternal mortality did not differ statistically by group. Limitation: Self-reported outcome measures, uncertain generalizability, and 41% loss to follow-up at 5 years.
Conclusion: Although some argue that abortion is detrimental to women's health, these study data indicate that physical health is no worse in women who sought and underwent abortion than in women who were denied abortion. Indeed, differences emerged suggesting worse health among those who gave birth. Primary Funding Source: An anonymous foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31181576     DOI: 10.7326/M18-1666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

1.  Abortion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial Disparities and Barriers to Care in the USA.

Authors:  Taida Wolfe; Yana van der Meulen Rodgers
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Why hundreds of scientists are weighing in on a high-stakes US abortion case.

Authors:  Amy Maxmen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Reproductive Rights in Neurology-The Supreme Court's Impact on All of Us.

Authors:  Sara C LaHue; Dawn Gano; Riley Bove
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 29.907

4.  Denials of Judicial Bypass Petitions for Abortion in Texas Before and After the 2016 Bypass Process Change: 2001-2018.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Susan Hays
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Medication to Manage Abortion and Miscarriage.

Authors:  Jessica Beaman; Christine Prifti; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Mindy Sobota
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  "No One Does This for the Money or Lifestyle": Abortion Providers' Perspectives on Factors Affecting Workforce Recruitment and Retention in the Southern United States.

Authors:  Pari Chowdhary; Anna Newton-Levinson; Roger Rochat
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-01-08

7.  Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments.

Authors:  Katie Woodruff; Erin Wingo; Nancy F Berglas; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-08

8.  Looking for a Silver Lining to the Dark Cloud: A Google Trends Analysis of Contraceptive Interest in the United States Post Roe vs. Wade Verdict.

Authors:  Priyankar K Datta; Sumit R Chowdhury; Ajisha Aravindan; Sayan Nath; Parijat Sen
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-19

9.  Complex situations: Economic insecurity, mental health, and substance use among pregnant women who consider - but do not have - abortions.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Nancy F Berglas; Katrina Kimport
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prenatal care utilization in pregnant women who consider but do not have abortions.

Authors:  Marika Toscano; Jillian Wood; Sara Spielman; Rita Ferri; Natalie Whaley; Neil S Seligman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.