Literature DB >> 28640684

Judicial Bypass for Minors Seeking Abortions in Arkansas Versus Other States.

Onur Altindag1, Ted Joyce1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe demographic characteristics and abortion timing of minors in Arkansas who obtained an abortion through a judicial bypass, and to contrast the frequency of judicial bypass in other states in the United States.
METHODS: We used individual-level data on all abortions to minors (n = 2624) performed in Arkansas from 2005 to 2014 and aggregated data from 10 additional states on abortions obtained through a judicial bypass. We characterized correlates of the judicial bypass and its association with the timing of abortion.
RESULTS: Minors in Arkansas who used the courts were more likely to be 17 years of age, nonresidents of Arkansas, Hispanic, and with fewer previous pregnancies than their younger, resident, non-Hispanic White, and multigravida counterparts; 7.7% of abortions to minors were obtained via a bypass in 11 states, but only 2% if Texas and Arkansas are excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: The demographics of minors who obtain an abortion through a judicial bypass differ significantly from those who have parental consent, and there is widespread variation in the proportion of bypass cases across states.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640684      PMCID: PMC5508140          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  Young Women's Experiences Obtaining Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Texas.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Emily Obront; Susan Hays
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  The Impact of Parental Involvement Laws on the Abortion Rate of Minors.

Authors:  Theodore J Joyce; Robert Kaestner; Jason Ward
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2020-02

3.  Denials of Judicial Bypass Petitions for Abortion in Texas Before and After the 2016 Bypass Process Change: 2001-2018.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Susan Hays
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Judicial bypass attorneys' experiences with abortion stigma in Texas courts.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Emily Obront; Susan Hays
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Identifying data for the empirical assessment of law (IDEAL): a realist approach to research gaps on the health effects of abortion law.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Adrienne R Ghorashi; Lindsay Foster Cloud; Rachel Rebouché; Patty Skuster; Antonella Lavelanet
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.