Literature DB >> 16525140

Changes in abortions and births and the Texas parental notification law.

Theodore Joyce1, Robert Kaestner, Silvie Colman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On January 1, 2000, Texas began enforcement of a law that requires physicians to notify a parent of a minor child seeking an abortion at least 48 hours before the procedure.
METHODS: We assessed changes in the rates in Texas of abortions and births (events per 1000 age-specific population) before enforcement of the parental notification law (1998 to 1999) and after enforcement (2000 to 2002). We did this by comparing the rate changes among minors 15 to 17 years of age at the time of conception (i.e., those who were subject to the law) with those of teens 18 years of age at the time of conception (i.e., those who were not subject to the law).
RESULTS: After enforcement of the law, abortion rates fell by 11 percent among 15-year-olds (rate ratio, 0.89; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.94), 20 percent among 16-year-olds (rate ratio, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.85), and 16 percent among 17-year-olds (rate ratio 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.87), relative to the rates among 18-year-olds. Among the subgroup of minors 17.50 to 17.74 years of age at the time of conception (who would have been subject to the parental notification law in early pregnancy), birth rates rose by 4 percent relative to those of teens 18.00 to 18.24 years of age (rate ratio, 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.08). The adjusted odds ratio for having an abortion after 12 weeks' gestation among minors 17.50 to 17.74 years of age as compared with 18-year-olds was 1.34 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.62).
CONCLUSIONS: The Texas parental notification law was associated with a decline in abortion rates among minors from 15 to 17 years of age. It was also associated with increased birth rates and rates of abortion during the second trimester among a subgroup of minors who were 17.50 to 17.74 years of age at the time of conception. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16525140     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa054047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  10 in total

1.  Misclassification bias and the estimated effect of parental involvement laws on adolescents' reproductive outcomes.

Authors:  Silvie Colman; Ted Joyce; Robert Kaestner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Fertility effects of abortion and birth control pill access for minors.

Authors:  Melanie Guldi
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-11

3.  Does parental consent for birth control affect underage pregnancy rates? The case of Texas.

Authors:  Sourafel Girma; David Paton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-12

4.  Trends in sexual health and risk behaviours among adolescent students in British Columbia.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Saewyc; Darlene Taylor; Yuko Homma; Gina Ogilvie
Journal:  Can J Hum Sex       Date:  2008-01-01

5.  Women's Reproductive Rights Policies and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A State-Level Analysis to Assess the Role of Race and Nativity Status.

Authors:  May Sudhinaraset; Dovile Vilda; Jessica D Gipson; Marta Bornstein; Maeve E Wallace
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  The Impact of Parental Involvement Laws on the Abortion Rate of Minors.

Authors:  Theodore J Joyce; Robert Kaestner; Jason Ward
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2020-02

7.  Age of Sexual Consent Law in Canada: Population-Based Evidence for Law and Policy.

Authors:  Bonnie B Miller; David N Cox; Elizabeth M Saewyc
Journal:  Can J Hum Sex       Date:  2010

8.  Parental consent for abortion and the judicial bypass option in Arkansas: effects and correlates.

Authors:  Ted Joyce
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-09

9.  Abortion before & after Roe.

Authors:  Ted Joyce; Ruoding Tan; Yuxiu Zhang
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Denials of Judicial Bypass Petitions for Abortion in Texas Before and After the 2016 Bypass Process Change: 2001-2018.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Susan Hays
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.