| Literature DB >> 31937819 |
Xiuzhi Zhu1,2,3, Li Chen1,2,3, Binhao Huang1,4, Yue Wang1,5, Lei Ji1,3, Jiong Wu1,2,3, Genhong Di1,2,3, Guangyu Liu1,2,3, Keda Yu1,2,3, Zhimin Shao1,2,3,6, Zhonghua Wang7,8,9.
Abstract
As a cell proliferation biomarker, Ki-67 is principally used in ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, the importance and the best cutoff point of Ki-67 in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear and was evaluated in this study.A total of 1800 patients with early invasive TNBC between 2011 and 2016 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were consecutively recruited for this study. The optimal cutoff for Ki-67 was assessed by Cutoff Finder. Propensity score matching (PSM, ratio = 1:2) was performed to match the Ki-67low group with the Ki-67high group. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. The most relevant cutoff value for Ki-67 for prognosis was 30% (p = 0.008). At the cutoff point of 30%, worse DFS and OS were observed in the Ki-67high group. In multivariate analyses, N-stage (p < 0.001), T-stage (p = 0.038), and Ki-67 at the 30% threshold (p = 0.020) were independently linked to OS. In subgroup analysis, Ki-67 cutoff at 30% had prognostic and predictive potential for DFS with either tumor size ≤2 cm (p = 0.008) or lymph node-negative (N-) (p = 0.038) and especially with T1N0M0 (stage I) TNBCs. For 945 N- TNBC patients, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) was associated with better OS in the Ki-67high group (p = 0.017) than in the Ki-67low group (p = 0.875). For stage I/Ki-67low patients, adjuvant CT did not affect DFS (p = 0.248). Thus, Ki-67 cutoff at 30% had early independent prognostic and predictive potential for OS and DFS in TNBCs, and Ki-67 > 30% was significantly associated with worse prognosis, especially for stage I patients. For stage I/Ki-67low TNBC patients, the advantage of CT is unclear, providing the basis for future de-escalation therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31937819 PMCID: PMC6959292 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57094-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. 1800 cases were enrolled. Abbreviations: TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.
Characteristics of the 1800 triple-negative breast cancer patients.
| Variable | Before PSM n = 1800 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ki-67Low (n = 464) | aKi-67High (n = 1336) | Total | |
| Number (%) | Number (%) | ||
| ≤50 | 155 (33.41%) | 739 (55.31%) | 894 (49.67%) |
| >50 | 309 (66.59%) | 597 (44.69%) | 906 (50.33%) |
| ≤24 | 295 (63.58%) | 870 (65.12%) | 1165 (64.72%) |
| >24 | 161 (34.7%) | 452 (33.83%) | 613 (34.06%) |
| Missing | 8 (1.72%) | 14 (1.05%) | 22 (1.22%) |
| Left | 235 (50.65%) | 652 (48.8%) | 887 (49.28%) |
| Right | 229 (49.35%) | 684 (51.2%) | 913 (50.72%) |
| No | 438 (94.4%) | 1267 (94.84%) | 1705 (94.72%) |
| Yes | 18 (3.88%) | 39 (2.92%) | 57 (3.17%) |
| Missing | 8 (1.72%) | 30 (2.25%) | 38 (2.11%) |
| I | 3 (0.65%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (0.17%) |
| II | 168 (36.21%) | 143 (10.7%) | 311 (17.28%) |
| III | 184 (39.66%) | 1119 (83.76%) | 1303 (72.39%) |
| Missing | 109 (23.49%) | 74 (5.54%) | 183 (10.17%) |
| T1 | 231 (49.78%) | 590 (44.16%) | 821 (45.61%) |
| T2 | 173 (37.28%) | 566 (42.37%) | 739 (41.06%) |
| T3 | 14 (3.02%) | 20 (1.49%) | 33 (1.89%) |
| Missing | 46 (9.91%) | 160 (11.98%) | 206 (11.44%) |
| N0 | 325 (70.04%) | 897 (67.14%) | 1222 (67.89%) |
| N1 | 88 (18.97%) | 298 (22.31%) | 386 (21.44%) |
| N2 | 27 (5.82%) | 92 (6.89%) | 119 (6.61%) |
| N3 | 24 (5.17%) | 49 (3.67%) | 73 (4.06%) |
| Mastectomy | 370 (79.74%) | 924 (69.16%) | 1294 (71.89%) |
| Lumpectomy | 94 (20.26%) | 412 (30.84%) | 506 (28.11%) |
| No | 42 (9.05%) | 33 (2.47%) | 75 (4.17%) |
| Yes | 371 (79.96%) | 1163 (87.05%) | 1534 (85.22%) |
| Missing | 51 (10.99%) | 140 (10.48%) | 191 (10.61%) |
| No | 264 (56.9%) | 621 (46.48%) | 885 (49.17%) |
| Yes | 146 (31.47%) | 560 (41.92%) | 706 (39.22%) |
| Missing | 54 (11.64%) | 155 (11.6%) | 209 (11.61%) |
Abbreviations: PSM, propensity score matching.
aHigh Ki-67 expression was defined as >30%.
bp value was derived from the chi-square test
Figure 2Immunohistochemical analysis of Ki-67 in six representative samples. The average score across the whole section should be taken. (a,b) Represent the Ki-67low group; (c,d) represent the Ki-67 at the 30% threshold; (e,f) represent the Ki-67high group. (a) The Ki-67 index was reported at 5%. (b) The Ki-67 index was reported at 10%. (c) The Ki-67 index was reported at 30%. (d) The Ki-67 index was reported at 30%. (e) The Ki-67 index was reported at 50%. (f) The Ki-67 index was reported at 60%. (MIB1 stain, scale bar = 80 µm and scale bar of inset = 20 µm).
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of factors associated with overall survival in triple-negative breast cancer.
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| Age | ≤50 vs >50 | 1.508 | 0.935–2.434 | 0.092 | 1.529 | 0.887–2.636 | 0.127 |
| BMI | ≤24 vs >24 | 1.285 | 0.837–1.973 | 0.252 | |||
| Location | Left vs right | 1.015 | 0.663–1.553 | 0.945 | |||
| Differentiation | III vs I + II | 1.181 | 0.706–1.978 | 0.526 | |||
| pT2 vs pT1 | 2.924 | 1.827–4.680 | 0.000 | 1.947 | 1.167–3.251 | 0.011 | |
| pT3 vs pT1 | 2.061 | 0.488–8.704 | 0.325 | 1.359 | 0.310–5.967 | 0.684 | |
| Multifocality | Yes vs no | 2.144 | 0.864–5.323 | 0.100 | 1.830 | 0.733–4.569 | 0.196 |
| pN1 vs pN0 | 2.451 | 1.408–4.265 | 0.002 | 2.168 | 1.183–3.972 | 0.012 | |
| pN2vs pN0 | 5.071 | 2.774–9.271 | 0.000 | 3.980 | 1.983–7.988 | 0.000 | |
| pN3 vs pN0 | 7.953 | 4.399–14.376 | 0.000 | 7.118 | 3.703–13.689 | 0.000 | |
| ≤30% vs >30% | 1.654 | 1.010–2.709 | 0.046 | 1.947 | 1.108–3.421 | ||
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
The covariates in the Cox model were all categorical variables, and the adjusted p value and HR were derived from the model.
Figure 3Subgroup analysis of the univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. It shows the difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between the Ki-67low group and the Ki-67high group. The covariates in the Cox model were all categorical variables, including Ki-67 and TNM. The adjusted p value and hazard ratio were derived from the Cox model, with Ki-67 ≤ 30% as a reference. (a) Univariate Cox regression model for overall survival; (b) multivariate Cox regression model for overall survival; (c) univariate Cox regression model for disease-free survival; (d) multivariate Cox regression model for disease-free survival. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Univariate Cox regression analysis for Ki-67 as a prognostic marker for DFS and OS.
| Variable | DFS | OS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | |||
| I | 3.577 | 1.390–9.207 | 42.152 | 0.316–5628.069 | 0.134 | |
| II | 1.270 | 0.756–2.133 | 0.366 | 1.300 | 0.647–2.612 | 0.461 |
| III | 0.351 | 0.738–2.355 | 0.351 | 1.249 | 0.594–2.625 | 0.558 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival. The adjusted p value and hazard ratio were derived from the Cox model, with Ki-67 ≤ 30% as a reference.
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier curve by Ki-67 in T1N0M0 triple-negative breast cancer patients. (a) Overall survival; (b) disease-free survival.
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier curve by stage and adjuvant chemotherapy in Ki-67low triple-negative breast cancer patients (a) overall survival; (b) disease-free survival. Abbreviations: CT, chemotherapy. Low Ki-67 expression was defined as ≤30%.