Literature DB >> 36261751

Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups-prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation.

H Vihervuori1, K Korpinen1, T A Autere1, H Repo2, K Talvinen1, P Kronqvist3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease lacking specific biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We evaluated the combined prognostic impact of clinical features and novel biomarkers of cell cycle-progression in age-dependent subgroups of TNBC patients.
METHODS: One hundred forty seven TNBC patients with complete clinical data and up to 18 year follow-up were collected from Turku University Hospital, Finland. Eight biomarkers for cell division were immunohistochemically detected to evaluate their clinical applicability in relation to patient and tumor characteristics.
RESULTS: Age at diagnosis was the decisive factor predicting disease-specific mortality in TNBC (p = 0.002). The established prognostic features, nodal status and Ki-67, predicted survival only when combined with age. The outcome and prognostic features differed significantly between age groups, middle-aged patients showing the most favorable outcome. Among young patients, only lack of basal differentiation predicted disease outcome, indicating 4.5-fold mortality risk (p = 0.03). Among patients aged > 57, the established prognostic features predicted disease outcome with up to 3.0-fold mortality risk for tumor size ≥ 2 cm (p = 0.001). Concerning cell proliferation, Ki-67 alone was a significant prognosticator among patients aged > 57 years (p = 0.009). Among the studied cell cycle-specific biomarkers, only geminin predicted disease outcome, indicating up to 6.2-fold increased risk of mortality for tumor size < 2 cm (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Traditional clinical features do not provide optimal prognostic characterization for all TNBC patients. Young age should be considered as an additional adverse prognostic feature in therapeutic considerations. Increased proliferation, as evaluated using Ki-67 or geminin immunohistochemistry, showed potential in detecting survival differences in subgroups of TNBC.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Geminin; Ki-67; Prognosis; Proliferation; Survival; Triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261751     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06767-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.624


  77 in total

1.  Prognostic value of Ki-67 labeling index in patients with node-negative, triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Elisabetta Munzone; E Botteri; A Sciandivasci; G Curigliano; F Nolè; M Mastropasqua; N Rotmensz; M Colleoni; A Esposito; L Adamoli; A Luini; A Goldhirsch; G Viale
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Cell-cycle Checkpoints and Aneuploidy on the Path to Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Wenzel; Amareshwar T K Singh
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Histopathological subclassification of triple negative breast cancer using prognostic scoring system: five variables as candidates.

Authors:  Minoru Miyashita; Takanori Ishida; Kazuyuki Ishida; Kentaro Tamaki; Masakazu Amari; Mika Watanabe; Noriaki Ohuchi; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Clinical significance of Ki-67 in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer as a predictor for chemosensitivity and for prognosis.

Authors:  Reiki Nishimura; Tomofumi Osako; Yasuhiro Okumura; Mitsuhiro Hayashi; Nobuyuki Arima
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 5.  Targeted Therapies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tomas G Lyons
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-11-21

Review 6.  Breast cancer.

Authors:  Sibylle Loibl; Philip Poortmans; Monica Morrow; Carsten Denkert; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Kyung-Hun Lee; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Wonshik Han; Dong-Wan Kim; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Molecular Subtyping of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers by Immunohistochemistry: Molecular Basis and Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Shen Zhao; Ding Ma; Yi Xiao; Xiao-Mei Li; Jian-Li Ma; Han Zhang; Xiao-Li Xu; Hong Lv; Wen-Hua Jiang; Wen-Tao Yang; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Qing-Yuan Zhang; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.837

9.  The prognostic and predictive potential of Ki-67 in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiuzhi Zhu; Li Chen; Binhao Huang; Yue Wang; Lei Ji; Jiong Wu; Genhong Di; Guangyu Liu; Keda Yu; Zhimin Shao; Zhonghua Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Value of Ki-67 expression in triple-negative breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin.

Authors:  Ruo-Xi Wang; Sheng Chen; Xi Jin; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.