Literature DB >> 10884949

Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.

R J Little1, D B Rubin.   

Abstract

A central problem in public health studies is how to make inferences about the causal effects of treatments or agents. In this article we review an approach to making such inferences via potential outcomes. In this approach, the causal effect is defined as a comparison of results from two or more alternative treatments, with only one of the results actually observed. We discuss the application of this approach to a number of data collection designs and associated problems commonly encountered in clinical research and epidemiology. Topics considered include the fundamental role of the assignment mechanism, in particular the importance of randomization as an unconfounded method of assignment; randomization-based and model-based methods of statistical inference for causal effects; methods for handling noncompliance and missing data; and methods for limiting bias in the analysis of observational data, including propensity score matching and sensitivity analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884949     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  190 in total

Review 1.  Does racism harm health? Did child abuse exist before 1962? On explicit questions, critical science, and current controversies: an ecosocial perspective.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Is intent-to-treat analysis always (ever) enough?

Authors:  Lewis B Sheiner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Issa J Dahabreh; Radley C Sheldrick; Jessica K Paulus; Mei Chung; Vasileia Varvarigou; Haseeb Jafri; Jeremy A Rassen; Thomas A Trikalinos; Georgios D Kitsios
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Inference for mutually exclusive competing events through a mixture of generalized gamma distributions.

Authors:  William Checkley; Roy G Brower; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Community Health Assessment and Improved Public Health Decision-Making: A Propensity Score Matching Approach.

Authors:  Kristina M Rabarison; Lava Timsina; Glen P Mays
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Calculating control variables with age at onset data to adjust for conditions prior to exposure.

Authors:  Michael Höfler; Tanja Brückl; Tanja Brueck; Roselind Lieb; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 7.  On some "disadvantages" of the population approach.

Authors:  Jerry R Nedelman
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jerry Avorn; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Matthew Cefalu; Nathan Palmer; Denis Agniel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation.

Authors:  Donna L Coffman; Wei Zhong
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.