Literature DB >> 31937618

A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Michael S Toss1, Guanhao Wei2, Jaspreet Kaur2, Karuna Mittal2, Da Hoon Choi2, Brian D Melton2, Remus M Osan2, Islam M Miligy1, Andrew R Green1, Emiel A M Janssen3, Håvard Søiland4, Keerthi Gogineni5, Upender Manne6, Padmashree Rida7,8, Emad A Rakha9, Ritu Aneja7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to predict risk of local recurrence (LR) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with a new visualization and quantification approach using centrosome amplification (CA), a cancer cell-specific trait widely associated with aggressiveness. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: This first-of-its-kind methodology evaluates the severity and frequency of numerical and structural CA present within DCIS and assigns a quantitative centrosomal amplification score (CAS) to each sample. Analyses were performed in a discovery cohort (DC, n = 133) and a validation cohort (VC, n = 119).
RESULTS: DCIS cases with LR exhibited significantly higher CAS than recurrence-free cases. Higher CAS was associated with a greater risk of developing LR (HR, 6.3 and 4.8 for DC and VC, respectively; P < 0.001). CAS remained an independent predictor of relapse-free survival (HR, 7.4 and 4.5 for DC and VC, respectively; P < 0.001) even after accounting for potentially confounding factors [grade, age, comedo necrosis, and radiotherapy (RT)]. Patient stratification using CAS (P < 0.0001) was superior to that by Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI; HR for CAS = 6.2 vs. HR for VNPI = 1.1). Among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery alone, CAS identified patients likely to benefit from adjuvant RT.
CONCLUSIONS: CAS predicted 10-year LR risk for patients who underwent surgical management alone and identified patients who may be at low risk of recurrence, and for whom adjuvant RT may not be required. CAS demonstrated the highest concordance among the known prognostic models such as VNPI and clinicopathologic variables such as grade, age, and comedo necrosis. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31937618      PMCID: PMC7299818          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

Review 1.  Centrosome amplification and the development of cancer.

Authors:  Antonino B D'Assoro; Wilma L Lingle; Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-09-09       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Thioredoxin-interacting protein is an independent risk stratifier for breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Islam M Miligy; Kylie L Gorringe; Michael S Toss; Abdulbaqi A Al-Kawaz; Peter Simpson; Maria Diez-Rodriguez; Christopher C Nolan; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Treatment selection for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast using the University of Southern California/Van Nuys (USC/VNPI) prognostic index.

Authors:  Melvin J Silverstein; Michael D Lagios
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Value of the Van Nuys Prognostic Index in prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  G P Boland; K C Chan; W F Knox; S A Roberts; N J Bundred
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Centrosome amplification, chromosome instability and cancer development.

Authors:  Kenji Fukasawa
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 6.  Causes and consequences of centrosome abnormalities in cancer.

Authors:  S A Godinho; D Pellman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Turning the headlights on novel cancer biomarkers: Inspection of mechanics underlying intratumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Michelle McBride; Padmashree C G Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2015-05-27

8.  Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont; L W Rogers; M Landenberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Loss of aurora A/STK15/BTAK overexpression correlates with transition of in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Ashraful Hoque; Jennifer Carter; Weiya Xia; Mien-Chie Hung; Aysegul A Sahin; Subrata Sen; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Centrosome amplification induces high grade features and is prognostic of worse outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan A Denu; Lauren M Zasadil; Craig Kanugh; Jennifer Laffin; Beth A Weaver; Mark E Burkard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  2-methoxyestradiol sensitizes breast cancer cells to taxanes by targeting centrosomes.

Authors:  Randa El-Zein; Jose Thaiparambil; Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-12-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.