Literature DB >> 26024970

Turning the headlights on novel cancer biomarkers: Inspection of mechanics underlying intratumor heterogeneity.

Michelle McBride1, Padmashree C G Rida2, Ritu Aneja3.   

Abstract

Although the existence of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) in the expression of common biomarkers has been described by pathologists since the late 1890s, we have only recently begun to fathom the staggering extent and near ubiquity of this phenomenon. From the tumor's perspective, ITH provides a stabilizing diversity that allows for the evolution of aggressive cancer phenotypes. As the weight of the evidence correlating ITH to poor prognosis burgeons, it has become increasingly important to determine the mechanisms by which a tumor acquires ITH, find clinically-adaptable means to quantify ITH and design strategies to deal with the numerous profound clinical ramifications that ITH forces upon us. Elucidation of the drivers of ITH could enable development of novel biomarkers whose interrogation might permit quantitative evaluation of the ITH inherent in a tumor in order to predict the poor prognosis risk associated with that tumor. This review proposes centrosome amplification (CA), aided and abetted by centrosome clustering mechanisms, as a critical driver of chromosomal instability (CIN) that makes a key contribution to ITH generation. Herein we also evaluate how a tumor's inherent mitotic propensity, which reflects the cell cycling kinetics within the tumor's proliferative cells, functions as the indispensable engine underpinning CIN, and determines the rate of CIN. We thus expound how the forces of centrosome amplification and mitotic propensity collaborate to sculpt the genetic landscape of a tumor and spawn extensive subclonal diversity. As such, centrosome amplification and mitotic propensity profiles could serve as clinically facile and powerful prognostic biomarkers that would enable more accurate risk segmentation of patients and design of individualized therapies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Centrosomes; Chromosomal instability; Intratumoral heterogeneity; Mitotic propensity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024970      PMCID: PMC4780421          DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2015.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Aspects Med        ISSN: 0098-2997


  90 in total

Review 1.  Merotelic kinetochore orientation, aneuploidy, and cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Cimini
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-05-23

2.  Ecology: diversity favours productivity.

Authors:  Andy Hector
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers.

Authors:  Scott L Carter; Aron C Eklund; Isaac S Kohane; Lyndsay N Harris; Zoltan Szallasi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins cooperate to induce mitotic defects and genomic instability by uncoupling centrosome duplication from the cell division cycle.

Authors:  S Duensing; L Y Lee; A Duensing; J Basile; S Piboonniyom; S Gonzalez; C P Crum; K Munger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Induction of centrosome amplification and chromosome instability in p53-null cells by transient exposure to subtoxic levels of S-phase-targeting anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Richard A Bennett; Hideki Izumi; Kenji Fukasawa
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Genome based cell population heterogeneity promotes tumorigenicity: the evolutionary mechanism of cancer.

Authors:  Christine J Ye; Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Steven W Bremer; Aruna S Jaiswal; Karen J Ye; Ming-Fong Lin; Lesley Lawrenson; Wayne D Lancaster; Markku Kurkinen; Joshua D Liao; C Gary Gairola; Malathy P V Shekhar; Satya Narayan; Fred R Miller; Henry H Q Heng
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 8.  Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time.

Authors:  Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Chromosome movement in mitosis requires microtubule anchorage at spindle poles.

Authors:  M B Gordon; L Howard; D A Compton
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02-05       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition.

Authors:  Y Zhai; P J Kronebusch; G G Borisy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Michael S Toss; Guanhao Wei; Jaspreet Kaur; Karuna Mittal; Da Hoon Choi; Brian D Melton; Remus M Osan; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emiel A M Janssen; Håvard Søiland; Keerthi Gogineni; Upender Manne; Padmashree Rida; Emad A Rakha; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Overexpression screens identify conserved dosage chromosome instability genes in yeast and human cancer.

Authors:  Supipi Duffy; Hok Khim Fam; Yi Kan Wang; Erin B Styles; Jung-Hyun Kim; J Sidney Ang; Tejomayee Singh; Vladimir Larionov; Sohrab P Shah; Brenda Andrews; Cornelius F Boerkoel; Philip Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The more the messier: centrosome amplification as a novel biomarker for personalized treatment of colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Monica M Mahathre; Padmashree Cg Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2015-11-10

4.  Intratumor Heterogeneity as a Prognostic Factor in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Xin Gao; Zicheng Zheng; Xinyu Zhao; Shiyao Zhang; Chunqiang Li; Gang Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Adaptation to Hypoxia May Promote Therapeutic Resistance to Androgen Receptor Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nikita Jinna; Padmashree Rida; Max Smart; Mark LaBarge; Tijana Jovanovic-Talisman; Rama Natarajan; Victoria Seewaldt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Aurora-A Kinase as a Promising Therapeutic Target in Cancer.

Authors:  Antonino B D'Assoro; Tufia Haddad; Evanthia Galanis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Texture Analysis Improves the Value of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting Interim Response of Primary Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Yiwen Sun; Xiangmei Qiao; Chong Jiang; Song Liu; Zhengyang Zhou
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.161

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.