BACKGROUND: The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI), an algorithm based on tumour size, tumour grade, presence of necrosis and excision margin width, is claimed to predict local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the VNPI in a UK population. METHODS: Clinicopathological data, including VNPI subgroups, for 237 patients who had breast-conserving operations for DCIS were examined. Multivariate data analysis was performed using a Cox regression model to examine the independence and relative importance of different variables in predicting recurrence, and to compare the data with those used in derivation of the VNPI. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 47 months. There were 37 ipsilateral local recurrences. Excision margin width (P < 0.001) and tumour grade (by Van Nuys grading (P = 0.014) or simple nuclear grading (P = 0.004)) were the only independent risk factors for local recurrence. Excision margin width had three times more power than grade in predicting local recurrence. Subgrouping data by VNPI score predicted recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001), but stratified 78 per cent of patients into a group with a moderate risk of local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Excision margin width is the most important predictor of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS. The VNPI lacked discriminatory power for guiding further patient management. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI), an algorithm based on tumour size, tumour grade, presence of necrosis and excision margin width, is claimed to predict local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the VNPI in a UK population. METHODS: Clinicopathological data, including VNPI subgroups, for 237 patients who had breast-conserving operations for DCIS were examined. Multivariate data analysis was performed using a Cox regression model to examine the independence and relative importance of different variables in predicting recurrence, and to compare the data with those used in derivation of the VNPI. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 47 months. There were 37 ipsilateral local recurrences. Excision margin width (P < 0.001) and tumour grade (by Van Nuys grading (P = 0.014) or simple nuclear grading (P = 0.004)) were the only independent risk factors for local recurrence. Excision margin width had three times more power than grade in predicting local recurrence. Subgrouping data by VNPI score predicted recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001), but stratified 78 per cent of patients into a group with a moderate risk of local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Excision margin width is the most important predictor of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS. The VNPI lacked discriminatory power for guiding further patient management. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Michael S Toss; Guanhao Wei; Jaspreet Kaur; Karuna Mittal; Da Hoon Choi; Brian D Melton; Remus M Osan; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emiel A M Janssen; Håvard Søiland; Keerthi Gogineni; Upender Manne; Padmashree Rida; Emad A Rakha; Ritu Aneja Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Renée S J M Schmitz; Erica A Wilthagen; Frederieke van Duijnhoven; Marja van Oirsouw; Ellen Verschuur; Thomas Lynch; Rinaa S Punglia; E Shelley Hwang; Jelle Wesseling; Marjanka K Schmidt; Eveline M A Bleiker; Ellen G Engelhardt Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-02 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Chirag Shah; Frank A Vicini; Sameer Berry; Thomas B Julian; John Ben Wilkinson; Simona F Shaitelman; Atif Khan; Steven E Finkelstein; Neal Goldstein Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Csaba Polgár; Zsuzsanna Kahán; Zsolt Orosz; Gabriella Gábor; Janaki Hadijev; Gábor Cserni; Janina Kulka; Nóra Jani; Zoltán Sulyok; György Lázár; Gábor Boross; Csaba Diczházi; Eva Szabó; Zsolt László; Zoltán Péntek; Tibor Major; János Fodor Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2008-04-26 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Dean A Shumway; Chandler M McLeod; Monica Morrow; Yun Li; Allison W Kurian; Aaron Sabolch; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley; Reshma Jagsi Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: B Cutuli; C Lemanski; A Fourquet; B de Lafontan; S Giard; A Meunier; R Pioud-Martigny; F Campana; H Marsiglia; S Lancrenon; E Mery; F Penault-Llorca; E Fondrinier; C Tunon de Lara Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Patrizia Damonte; J Graeme Hodgson; Jane Qian Chen; Lawrence J T Young; Robert D Cardiff; Alexander D Borowsky Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 6.466