Literature DB >> 29955142

Thioredoxin-interacting protein is an independent risk stratifier for breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Islam M Miligy1,2, Kylie L Gorringe3,4, Michael S Toss1,5, Abdulbaqi A Al-Kawaz1, Peter Simpson6, Maria Diez-Rodriguez1, Christopher C Nolan1, Ian O Ellis1, Andrew R Green1, Emad A Rakha7,8.   

Abstract

Current clinicopathological parameters are useful predictors of breast ductal carcinoma in situ behavior, but they are insufficient to define high-risk patients for disease progression precisely. Thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) is a key player of oxidative stress. This study aims to evaluate the role of TXNIP as a predictor of ductal carcinoma in situ progression. Tissue microarrays from 776 pure ductal carcinoma in situ and 239 mixed ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive tumors were constructed. All patients were treated at a single institution with a long-term follow-up and TXNIP expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry. TXNIP expression was investigated in terms of associations with clinicopathological and molecular features and patient outcome. Loss/reduced cytoplasmic expression of TXNIP was associated with features of aggressiveness including high nuclear grade (p = 1.6 × 10-5), presence of comedo necrosis (p = 0.001), and estrogen receptor negative (ER-)/HER2- ductal carcinoma in situ (p = 4.6 × 10-5). Univariate analysis showed an inverse association between TXNIP expression and outcome in terms of shorter local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.009). Multivariable analyses showed that independent predictors of ductal carcinoma in situ recurrence were low TXNIP expression (p = 0.005, HR = 0.51, and 95% CI: 0.32-0.81), larger ductal carcinoma in situ size, and high nuclear grade. TXNIP functions as a tumor suppressor gene with loss of its expression associated with ductal carcinoma in situ recurrence. TXNIP can be used as a potentially useful marker in prognostic stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ for management decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29955142     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0086-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  12 in total

1.  A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Michael S Toss; Guanhao Wei; Jaspreet Kaur; Karuna Mittal; Da Hoon Choi; Brian D Melton; Remus M Osan; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emiel A M Janssen; Håvard Søiland; Keerthi Gogineni; Upender Manne; Padmashree Rida; Emad A Rakha; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Molecular Changes Accompanying Disease Progression.

Authors:  Gemma M Wilson; Phuong Dinh; Nirmala Pathmanathan; J Dinny Graham
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  TXNIP Links Anticipatory Unfolded Protein Response to Estrogen Reprogramming Glucose Metabolism in Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Yuanzhong Wang; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.051

4.  Myxovirus resistance 1 (MX1) is an independent predictor of poor outcome in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Abrar I Aljohani; Chitra Joseph; Sasagu Kurozumi; Omar J Mohammed; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  The prognostic significance of wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) in breast cancer.

Authors:  Abrar I Aljohani; Michael S Toss; Sasagu Kurozumi; Chitra Joseph; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Islam M Miligy; Rokaya El Ansari; Nigel P Mongan; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.624

6.  Impact of the acidic environment on gene expression and functional parameters of tumors in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Mandy Rauschner; Luisa Lange; Thea Hüsing; Sarah Reime; Alexander Nolze; Marcel Maschek; Oliver Thews; Anne Riemann
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  The frequency and clinical significance of DNA polymerase beta (POLβ) expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Abdulbaqi Al-Kawaz; Reem Ali; Michael S Toss; Islam M Miligy; Omar J Mohammed; Andrew R Green; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  The prognostic significance of Flap Endonuclease 1 (FEN1) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Abdulbaqi Al-Kawaz; Islam M Miligy; Michael S Toss; Omar J Mohammed; Andrew R Green; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Michael S Toss; Asima Abidi; Dorothea Lesche; Chitra Joseph; Sakshi Mahale; Hugo Saunders; Tanjina Kader; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Kylie L Gorringe; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The clinical significance of oestrogen receptor expression in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Islam M Miligy; Michael S Toss; Sho Shiino; Georgette Oni; Binafsha M Syed; Hazem Khout; Qing Ting Tan; Andrew R Green; R Douglas Macmillan; John F R Robertson; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.