Literature DB >> 31925802

A comparison of asparaginase activity in generic formulations of E.coli derived L- asparaginase: In-vitro study and retrospective analysis of asparaginase monitoring in pediatric patients with leukemia.

Hari Sankaran1, Soumika Sengupta2,3, Vaitashi Purohit2, Anand Kotagere1, Nirmalya Roy Moulik1, Maya Prasad1, Chetan Dhamne1, Gaurav Narula1, Shripad Banavali1, Vikram Gota2.   

Abstract

AIMS: L-asparaginase is an essential medicine in the treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the quality of generic formulations is an area of concern. We compared nine generic formulations of L-asparaginase available in India with the innovator.
METHODS: The quality of formulations was assessed by measuring 72-hour trough asparaginase activity in children with ALL during induction following administration of 10,000 IU/m2 of L-asparaginase. In-vitro analysis of the label claim was assessed by measuring activity of three generic formulations. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) was used to determine the amount of host contaminant proteins (HCPs) in the formulations.
RESULTS: Between March 2015 to June 2018, 240 samples from 195 patients were analyzed. The number of samples analyzed ranged from 7-66 per generic brand (median: 18) and seven of the innovator. The proportion of generic formulations that failed to achieve a predefined clinical threshold activity of 50 IU/L ranged from 16.7% (2/12) to 84.9% (28/33) in the highest activity to lowest activity generic respectively. On other hand, all innovator samples had activity greater than 50 IU/L. In-vitro asparaginase activity in the three generic formulations tested ranged from 71.4-74.6% of the label claim (10,000 IU) compared to 93.5% for the innovator. LC/MS analysis of generic 5 identified 25 HCPs with a relative peptide count of 27.1% of the total peptides.
CONCLUSIONS: Generic formulations had lower asparaginase activity which raises serious clinical concerns regarding their quality. Until stringent regulatory enforcement improves the quality of these generics, dose adaptive strategies coupled with therapeutic drug monitoring need to be considered.
© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generics; Innovator; L-asparaginase; Quality

Year:  2020        PMID: 31925802      PMCID: PMC7256116          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  15 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of a new recombinant asparaginase preparation in children with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a randomized phase 2 clinical trial.

Authors:  Rob Pieters; Inge Appel; Hans-Juergen Kuehnel; Iris Tetzlaff-Fohr; Uwe Pichlmeier; Inekee van der Vaart; Eline Visser; Rolinda Stigter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Toward better quality of anticancer generics in India.

Authors:  V S Gota; P Patial
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2014 July-September       Impact factor: 1.224

3.  Consensus expert recommendations for identification and management of asparaginase hypersensitivity and silent inactivation.

Authors:  Inge M van der Sluis; Lynda M Vrooman; Rob Pieters; Andre Baruchel; Gabriele Escherich; Nicholas Goulden; Veerle Mondelaers; Jose Sanchez de Toledo; Carmelo Rizzari; Lewis B Silverman; James A Whitlock
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in India: an analysis of prognostic factors using a single treatment regimen.

Authors:  S Advani; S Pai; D Venzon; M Adde; P K Kurkure; C N Nair; B Sirohi; S D Banavali; R Hawaldar; B B Kolhatkar; T Vats; I Magrath
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Analytical validation of a microplate reader-based method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of L-asparaginase in human serum.

Authors:  Claudia Lanvers; Joao Paulo Vieira Pinheiro; Georg Hempel; Gudrun Wuerthwein; Joachim Boos
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  A pharmacoeconomic analysis of pegaspargase versus native Escherichia coli L-asparaginase for the treatment of children with standard-risk, acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the Children's Cancer Group study (CCG-1962).

Authors:  Helen A Kurre; Alice G Ettinger; David L Veenstra; Paul S Gaynon; Janet Franklin; Susan F Sencer; Gregory H Reaman; Beverly J Lange; John S Holcenberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.289

Review 7.  L-asparaginase treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a focus on Erwinia asparaginase.

Authors:  Rob Pieters; Stephen P Hunger; Joachim Boos; Carmelo Rizzari; Lewis Silverman; Andre Baruchel; Nicola Goekbuget; Martin Schrappe; Ching-Hon Pui
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Rational engineering of L-asparaginase reveals importance of dual activity for cancer cell toxicity.

Authors:  Marc N Offman; Marcin Krol; Naina Patel; Shekhar Krishnan; JiZhong Liu; Vaskar Saha; Paul A Bates
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  The future of host cell protein (HCP) identification during process development and manufacturing linked to a risk-based management for their control.

Authors:  Daniel G Bracewell; Richard Francis; C Mark Smales
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Low Bioavailability and High Immunogenicity of a New Brand of E. colil-Asparaginase with Active Host Contaminating Proteins.

Authors:  Priscila Pini Zenatti; Natacha Azussa Migita; Nathália Moreno Cury; Rosângela Aparecida Mendes-Silva; Fabio Cesar Gozzo; Pedro Otavio de Campos-Lima; José Andrés Yunes; Silvia Regina Brandalise
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 8.143

View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of asparaginase activity in generic formulations of E.coli derived L- asparaginase: In-vitro study and retrospective analysis of asparaginase monitoring in pediatric patients with leukemia.

Authors:  Hari Sankaran; Soumika Sengupta; Vaitashi Purohit; Anand Kotagere; Nirmalya Roy Moulik; Maya Prasad; Chetan Dhamne; Gaurav Narula; Shripad Banavali; Vikram Gota
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  A prospective, open-label, randomised, parallel design study of 4 generic formulations of intramuscular L-asparaginase in childhood precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL).

Authors:  Suja Johnson; Chetan Dhamne; Hari Sankaran; Khushboo A Gandhi; Pallavi Rane; Nirmaly Roy Moulik; Shraddha Mahesh Jadhav; Murari Gurjar; Gaurav Narula; Shripad Banavali; Vikram Gota
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.288

3.  Randomized, Parallel Group, Open-Label Bioequivalence Trial of Intramuscular Pegaspargase in Patients With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Manjunath Nookala Krishnamurthy; Gaurav Narula; Khushboo Gandhi; Ankita Awase; Ruta Pandit; Sunil Raut; Ritu Singh; Vikram Gota; Shripad Dinanath Banavali
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-07

4.  Unsatisfactory quality of E. coli asparaginase biogenerics in India: Implications for clinical outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Jasmeet Sidhu; Manash Pratim Gogoi; Praveen Agarwal; Tathagata Mukherjee; Debparna Saha; Priyanka Bose; Prakriti Roy; Yogesh Phadke; Bhatu Sonawane; Pritha Paul; Vaskar Saha; Shekhar Krishnan
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.838

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.