Suja Johnson1, Chetan Dhamne2,3, Hari Sankaran2, Khushboo A Gandhi1, Pallavi Rane1, Nirmaly Roy Moulik1,2, Shraddha Mahesh Jadhav1, Murari Gurjar1, Gaurav Narula2,3, Shripad Banavali2,3, Vikram Gota4,5. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India. 2. Department of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. 3. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, 400094, India. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India. vgota76@gmail.com. 5. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, 400094, India. vgota76@gmail.com.
Abstract
AIMS: L-asparaginase is an essential medicine for childhood ALL. The quality of generic L-asparaginase available in India is a matter of concern. We compared four commonly used generic formulations of L-asparaginase in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomised trial of four generic formulations of asparaginase for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk B-ALL. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive generic asparaginase at a dose of at 10,000 IU/m 2 on days 9, 12, 15, and 18 of a 35-day cycle (Induction treatment). The primary end points were to determine the difference in the asparaginase activity and asparagine depletion. Historical patients who received L-asparaginase Medac (innovator) served as controls. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients underwent randomization; 12 patients each in the four arms. Failure to achieve predefined activity threshold of 100 IU/L was observed in 9/40 samples of Generic A (22·5%), 23/40 of Generic B (57·5%), and 43/44 (98%) each of Generic C and D. All 27 samples from seven historical patients who were administered Medac had activity > 100 IU/L. The average activity was significantly higher for Genericm A, 154 (70·3, 285·4) IU/L followed by Generic B 84·5(44·2, 289·1) IU/L, Generic C 45(14·4, 58·4) IU/L, and Generic D 20·4(13, 35) IU/L. Only 6 patients had asparaginase activity > 100 IU/L on each of the four occasions (Generic A = 5; Generic B = 1), and none of them developed Anti-Asparaginase Antibodies (AAA). On the other hand, AAA was observed in 12/36 patients who had at least one level < 100 IU/L (P < 0·05): Generic A 3/5, Generic B = 3/9, Generic D (4/11), and Generic C (5/11). CONCLUSION: Generic A and B had better trough asparaginase activity compared to Generic D and C. Overall, generic formulations had lower asparaginase activity which raises serious clinical concerns regarding their quality. Until strict regulatory enforcement improves the quality of these generics, dose adaptive approaches coupled with therapeutic drug monitoring need to be considered.
AIMS: L-asparaginase is an essential medicine for childhood ALL. The quality of generic L-asparaginase available in India is a matter of concern. We compared four commonly used generic formulations of L-asparaginase in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomised trial of four generic formulations of asparaginase for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk B-ALL. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive generic asparaginase at a dose of at 10,000 IU/m 2 on days 9, 12, 15, and 18 of a 35-day cycle (Induction treatment). The primary end points were to determine the difference in the asparaginase activity and asparagine depletion. Historical patients who received L-asparaginase Medac (innovator) served as controls. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients underwent randomization; 12 patients each in the four arms. Failure to achieve predefined activity threshold of 100 IU/L was observed in 9/40 samples of Generic A (22·5%), 23/40 of Generic B (57·5%), and 43/44 (98%) each of Generic C and D. All 27 samples from seven historical patients who were administered Medac had activity > 100 IU/L. The average activity was significantly higher for Genericm A, 154 (70·3, 285·4) IU/L followed by Generic B 84·5(44·2, 289·1) IU/L, Generic C 45(14·4, 58·4) IU/L, and Generic D 20·4(13, 35) IU/L. Only 6 patients had asparaginase activity > 100 IU/L on each of the four occasions (Generic A = 5; Generic B = 1), and none of them developed Anti-Asparaginase Antibodies (AAA). On the other hand, AAA was observed in 12/36 patients who had at least one level < 100 IU/L (P < 0·05): Generic A 3/5, Generic B = 3/9, Generic D (4/11), and Generic C (5/11). CONCLUSION: Generic A and B had better trough asparaginase activity compared to Generic D and C. Overall, generic formulations had lower asparaginase activity which raises serious clinical concerns regarding their quality. Until strict regulatory enforcement improves the quality of these generics, dose adaptive approaches coupled with therapeutic drug monitoring need to be considered.
Authors: Alexandra Cameron; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Hubert G M Leufkens; Richard Ogilvie Laing Journal: Value Health Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Rob Pieters; Stephen P Hunger; Joachim Boos; Carmelo Rizzari; Lewis Silverman; Andre Baruchel; Nicola Goekbuget; Martin Schrappe; Ching-Hon Pui Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Möricke; M Zimmermann; A Reiter; G Henze; A Schrauder; H Gadner; W D Ludwig; J Ritter; J Harbott; G Mann; T Klingebiel; F Zintl; C Niemeyer; B Kremens; F Niggli; D Niethammer; K Welte; M Stanulla; E Odenwald; H Riehm; M Schrappe Journal: Leukemia Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Ching-Hon Pui; Dario Campana; Deqing Pei; W Paul Bowman; John T Sandlund; Sue C Kaste; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Susana C Raimondi; Mihaela Onciu; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Larry E Kun; Sima Jeha; Cheng Cheng; Scott C Howard; Vickey Simmons; Amy Bayles; Monika L Metzger; James M Boyett; Wing Leung; Rupert Handgretinger; James R Downing; William E Evans; Mary V Relling Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 91.245